SANDY ADIRONDACK
Legal and governance training and consultancy
for the voluntary sector
OTHER CHAPTERS
I. THE ORGANISATION

Ch.1: Setting up an organisation
Ch.2: Unincorporated organisations
Ch.3: Incorporated organisations
Ch.4: Charitable status, charity law & regulation
Ch.5: The organisation's objects
Ch.6: The organisation's name
Ch.7: The governing document
Ch.8: Registering as a charity
Ch.9: Branches, subsidiaries & group structures
Ch.10: Changing legal form
Ch.11: Collaborative working, partnerships and mergers
II. GOVERNANCE
Ch.12: Members of the organisation
Ch.13: Members of the governing body
Ch.14: Officers, committees & sub-committees
Ch.15: Duties & powers of the governing body
Ch.16: Restrictions on payments & benefits
Ch.17: The registered office & other premises
Ch.18: Communication & paperwork
Ch.19: Meetings, resolutions & decision making
Ch.20: Assets & agency
Ch.21: Contracts & contract law
Ch.22: Risk & liability
Ch.23: Insurance
Ch.24: Financial difficulties & winding up
III. EMPLOYEES, WORKERS, VOLUNTEERS & OTHER STAFF
Ch.25: Employees & other workers
Ch.26: Rights, duties & the contract of employment
Ch.27: Model contract of employment
Ch.28: Equal opportunities in employment
Ch.29: Taking on new employees
Ch.30: Pay & pensions
Ch.31: Working time, time off & leave
Ch.32: Rights of parents & carers
Ch.33: Disciplinary matters, grievances & whistleblowing
Ch.34: Termination of employment
Ch.35: Redundancy
Ch.36: Employer-employee relations
Ch.37: Employment claims & settlement
Ch.38: Self employed & other contractors
Ch.39: Volunteers
IV. SERVICES & ACTIVITIES
Ch.40: Health & safety
Ch.41: Safeguarding children & vulnerable adults
Ch.42: Equal opportunities: goods, services & facilities
Ch.43: Data protection & use of information
Ch.44: Intellectual property
Ch.45: Publications, publicity & the internet
Ch.46: Campaigning & political activities
Ch.47: Public events, entertainment & licensing
V. FUNDING & FUNDRAISING
Ch.48: Funding & fundraising: General rules
Ch.49: Fundraising activities
Ch.50: Tax-effective giving
Ch.51: Trading & social enterprise
Ch.52: Contracts & service agreements
VI. FINANCE
Ch.53: Financial procedures & security
Ch.55: Auditors & independent examiners
Ch.56: Corporation tax, income tax & capital gains tax
Ch.57: Value added tax
Ch.58: Investment & reserves
Ch.59: Borrowing
VII. PROPERTY
Ch.60: Land ownership & tenure
Ch.61: Acquiring & disposing of property
Ch.62: Business leases
Ch.63: Property management & the environment
VIII. BACKGROUND TO THE LAW
Ch.64: How the law works
Ch.65: Dispute resolution & litigation
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER 54:
THE RUSSELL-COOKE
VOLUNTARY SECTOR LEGAL HANDBOOK

This page contains information that has appeared on Sandy Adirondack's legal update website for voluntary organisations at www.sandy-a.co.uk/legal.htm. For current updates, including potential changes that are in the pipeline, see the legal update website.

These websites for each chapter update the 3rd edition of The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook by James Sinclair Taylor and the Charity Team at Russell-Cooke Solicitors, edited by Sandy Adirondack (Directory of Social Change, 2009). The websites are not intended as a comprehensive update and should not be treated as such.

To order a copy of The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook, print out the order form at www.sandy-a.co.uk/bookserv.htm or send an email order by clicking . It costs £60 for voluntary organisations or £90 for others, plus 10% p&p.

To avoid spamming, an email address is not given on screen. If you can't see the word 'here' or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is bookservice at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.

The information here covers the law applicable to England and Wales. It may not apply in Northern Ireland and/or Scotland. These news items are not a full or definitive statement of the law and are not intended as a substitute for professional legal advice. No responsibility for loss occasioned as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting can be taken by the author.


Chapter 54
ANNUAL ACCOUNTS, REPORTS AND RETURNS


The items below formerly appeared on the legal update website for voluntary organisations and are archived here. The content may be out of date and links may not work. For current updates to the chapter, see the legal update website for voluntary organisations at www.sandy-a.co.uk/finance.htm.


FINANCIAL PROCEDURES AND ACCOUNTING RESOURCES

Added 1/4/12. This information updates chapters 53 & 54 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Most basic guidance for businesses on financial procedures and record keeping is also relevant for charities and voluntary organisations, but is likely to need to be adapted to ensure the systems can comply with charity requirements, such as tracking restricted income and related expenditure, and separating taxable and non-taxable income. New or recently updated guidance which may be useful includes:

  • Keeping records for business: What you need to know. A basic guide with a list of where to get more information.
    www.hmrc.gov.uk/factsheet/record-keeping.pdf

  • A general guide to keeping records for your tax return. Detailed guidance on record keeping covering the records you may have to keep, common problems and examples.
    www.hmrc.gov.uk/sa/rk-bk1.pdf

  • Set up a basic record keeping system. Examples of spreadsheets and information and setting up a record keeping system.
    www.businesslinks.gov.uk/recordkeeping

  • Find out what records you should be keeping. The records you need to keep, and how to assess how well you are keeping them.
    www.businesslink.gov.uk/recordkeepingcheck

  • Internal financial controls for charities (CC8). The main points of financial management, planning and control in the context of charity law and good practice, including electronic banking and other recent changes, and how to safeguard against fraud.
    www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Publications/cc8.aspx

  • Understanding reports on charity financial statements. First in a series of short guides from the CIPFA (Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy) charities panel, intended to help accountants and non-accountants understand charity accounting and reporting.
    tinyurl.com/3yu4hlj

  • Updated guidance and resources from Mango (Management Accounting for Non-Governmental Organisations), to help charities delivering emergency aid to manage their finance.
    www.mango.org.uk

HODGSON RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHARITY ACCOUNTS, REPORTS, AUDIT AND RETURNS

Updated 18/8/13. This information updates s.54.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In his review of the Charities Act presented to Parliament on 16 July 2012, Lord Hodgson made the following recommendations in relation to charity accounts, reports, audit and returns, and the government commented on some of them in its interim response on 3 November 2013. The government's full response will include consideration of the Public Administration Select Committee's report on its inquiry into the Charities Act 2006 and the regulation of charities, which was published on 6 June 2013.

  • Work by Companies House and the Charity Commission to create a single reporting system for charitable companies should continue as a matter of urgency. The potential for joint accounting requirements should also be investigated. [Chapter 5 recommendation 14].

    The Public Administration Select Committee did not go this far, but recommended that Companies House and the Charity Commission work towards a single filing of annual returns for charities registered with both Companies House and the Commission.

  • The Charity Commission should continue to ensure that the information available about the charities on its register meets public needs and demand and is regularly reviewed to ensure it continues to meet these requirements. [Chapter 6 recommendation 7]

  • The requirement to submit accounts and reporting information should be aligned with the registration threshold (recommended in Chapter 4 to be set at £25,000, with the further requirement that charities below this threshold claiming tax reliefs should also be required to register). [Chapter 6 recommendation 8]

  • All compulsorily registered charities should be required to submit their accounts and annual return and they should be publicly available on the Commission website. [Chapter 6 recommendation 9]

  • Voluntarily registered charities must submit accounts, for publication on the Commission’s website, and must do so electronically. Submissions by charities that are compulsorily registered but have an income below £25,000 per year must also be electronic. [Chapter 6 recommendation 10]

  • All registered charities with an annual income of less than £25,000 should be identified on the Commission’s register as "small" alongside their registration number. The intention of this is to improve the public perception that these charities are subject to little proactive regulatory oversight — and alert potential donors to this fact. [Chapter 6 recommendation 11]
    Sandy's comment: I have a real problem with this. If it is made explicit that basically the Commission isn't bothering to regulate charities under £25,000 even if they are registered with the Commission, this could undermine the public's confidence in all small charities, both registered and unregistered, and could also undermine the confidence of those charities' trustees in the Commission.

  • The summary information return (SIR) for charities over £1 million should be abolished, subject to the requirement that all the information it provides is available elsewhere in charities' accounts and annual returns. [Chapter 6 recommendation 12]

  • The Charity Commission should continue with its plans to simplify and improve the Charities SORP. [Chapter 6 recommendation 13]

  • The income level at which charities are required to have their accounts audited should increase from £500,000 to £1 million. The audit threshold for charities with assets valued at £3.26 million should be removed completely. [Chapter 6 recommendation 14]

    Charities with income above £25,000 but below the new audit threshold would be able to have either an independent examination or a full audit. If income is above £250,000 the examiner must be qualified to carry out full audits.

  • The Charity Commission should explore technology-based ways of validating data from the information provided to it in both charities' accounts and annual return. [Chapter 6 recommendation 15]

  • All information required to be submitted by charities should be combined into a single document for simplicity. The first page of this should be a list of key risk indicators to help the Commission identify a sample of charities for further investigation. The completed list should also be published on the charity’s register entry to aid public understanding and exercise of judgment. [Chapter 6 recommendation 16]

    The suggested indicators for this "traffic light" system are whether the charity has remunerated staff; whether it receives local or national government funding and, if so, what proportion of total funding this represents; whether the charity raises money from the public and if so, whether it is a member of the Fundraising Standards Board; whether the charity spends money or has operations overseas and if so, in which countries; whether any trustees have served for more than nine years in total; whether any of the trustees are paid; and whether the charity has ever been fined, or submitted a serious incident report, to any of its regulators.
    Sandy's comment: This would need to be very carefully worded; otherwise potential donors and others who get information about charities from the Commission's website could get the impression that a charity is at risk simply because it has paid staff or has trustees who have served more than nine years.

    The indicator relating to local or national government funding, if it is to be included, should also include European funding. It would need to be clear whether the government funding indicator covers only funding received directly from government, or also includes funding from quangos or other publicly funded bodies that are not governmental bodies as such.

    It has been suggested that owning or managing property should also be an indicator.

  • Sanctions for late filing of accounts and annual returns should include the withdrawal of gift aid. The government and the Charity Commission should also give thought to the costs, benefits and logistics of introducing late filing fines. [Chapter 6 recommendation 17]. The Public Administration Select Committee supported fines for late filing.
    Sandy's comment: Both proposals — the withdrawal of gift aid and the imposition of late filing fines — are controversial and are generally considered impractical and/or unsuitable. There is particular concern about the impact of fines on small charities, because a fine will inevitably be a greater share of their income than for larger charities.

  • The government should work with the Charity Commission to develop a fair and proportionate system of charging for filing annual returns with the Commission. Any such charges should be set at a level to reflect the activities that they cover. Any funds raised must be accepted by HM Treasury as being an incremental increase in resources available to enable the Commission to carry out its functions more effectively not merely reason to reduce its budget by the same amount. [Chapter 6 recommendation 18].
    The Public Administration Select Committee did not support the proposal to charge a filing fee, saying it amounted to a tax on charities. Sam Younger, Charity Commission chief executive, said on 3 July 2013 it is unlikely the government would support the legislation necessary for the Commission to charge such fees.
    Sandy's comment: Not surprisingly, the proposal to charge filing fees is not popular.

  • The application of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) to charitable organisations should be proportionate and should add no additional burdens to these organisations. The Financial Reporting Council should work with the Charity Commission before and during implementation to ensure this. [Chapter 10 organisational forms recommendation 2]

  • The reporting requirements set out in the Education Act 1994 s.22 can make reporting lines confused for students' unions linked to universities, now they have been required to register with the Charity Commission. These conflicts should be investigated. [Appendix A recommendation 29]
Lord Hodgson's report and recommendations can be accessed on the Cabinet Office website via tinyurl.com/c2azftb. The government's interim response is on the Cabinet Office website via tinyurl.com/poqqqr6.

Go back to list of all of Lord Hodgson's recommendations
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


CHARITY ACCOUNTS, REPORTS, INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION AND AUDIT

Updated 17/3/12. This information updates 54.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Charities Act 2011 consolidates nearly all of the Charities Acts 1993 and 2006 into one new piece of legislation. From 14 March 2012, annual accounts, reports and other formal documents which would contain references to the repealed acts should refer to the Charities Act 2011, and where a specific section is referred to, it should be changed to the 2011 section number.

The Charity Commission has confirmed that there is no need to change any documents finalised before 14 March, and new documents will still be valid even if the old references are accidentally used. The Commission's statement is at tinyurl.com/72sxnac.

For more about the Charities Act 2011 and links to lists of the new section numbers, see www.sandy-a.co.uk/managing.htm#charitiesact-consolidation.

The Auditing Practices Board's practice note 11, The audit of charities in the UK, was updated in March 2012 to reflect the new references to the 2011 act, and also to reflect changes in accounting and audit requirements under charity law in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and changes in reporting requirements for companies that are exempt from a company audit. The Auditing Practice Board is now the Financial Reporting Council's audit and assurance council. Practice note 11 (152 pages) is on the FRC website via tinyurl.com/7r97xey.

Scotland
For financial years starting on or after 1 April 2011, i.e. ending on or after 31 March 2012, charities registered with the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) must comply with changes introduced by the Charities Accounts (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2010. OSCR’s guidance on these changes can be accessed via tinyurl.com/3fmmo5g.

The regulations are at www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2010/287/contents/made.


TWO NEW CHARITIES SORPs

Updated 17/11/14. This information updates s.54.2.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Two new statements of recommended practice (SORP) for charity accounts were published on 16 July 2014, following a consultation by the joint SORP-making body (the Charity Commission and the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator) from July to November 2013. The choice of SORP will depend on which financial reporting standard the charity follows [see Which version?, below].

The new SORPs will come into effect for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2015, replacing the current SORP which dates from 2005. When using a new SORP for the first time, comparative figures for the previous financial year will need to be prepared in the same format. So it is important to become aware of relevant changes and take advice about what information needs to be collected for financial years starting in 2014, rather than waiting until 2015.

Virtually all charitable organisations throughout the UK, even if they are not registered with the relevant charity regulator, must comply with at least some parts of the charities SORP. The only exceptions are charities which have their own SORP, such as registered social landlords.

As at present, the new SORP rules on accounts and reports will apply only if the charity prepares accounts on an accruals basis. This includes:

  • all charities which are companies, regardless of income;
  • non-company charities with annual income over £250,000;
  • non-company charities with annual income no more than £250,000 which choose to prepare accounts on an accruals basis.
Non-company charities with income no more than £250,000 which prepare accounts on a receipts and payments basis, rather than an accruals basis, do not need to comply with the SORP rules on accounts. But they do have to comply with SORP rules on annual reports.

Although the SORP is only "recommended" practice, regulations require charity accruals accounts to be prepared in accordance with SORP methods and principles unless doing so would produce a distorted view of the accounts. If SORP is not followed, this must be explained in the notes to the accounts.

Unlike previous SORPs, the new ones distinguish clearly between what must be done, what should be done as best practice, but does not have to be, and what may be gone as an option.


Which version?
One of the new SORPs for charities is based on the current financial reporting standard for smaller entities (FRSSE, which you can pronounce frizzy), and can be used by charities meeting any two of the following conditions: annual income not exceeding £6.5 million; balance sheet total not exceeding £3.26 million; average number of employees not more than 50. According to Third Sector (26 November 2013), about 99% of charities are eligible to use FRSSE.

The other SORP is based on a new financial reporting standard 102 (FRS 102) for the UK and Republic of Ireland, which comes into effect for all accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2015. Charities which are not entitled to use FRSSE must used the FRS 102 SORP. Charities entitled to use FRSSE may use the FRS 102 SORP if they choose.

The FRSSE SORP may seem the obvious choice for charities eligible to use it — but a consultation by the Financial Reporting Council from 1 September to 30 November 2014 proposes that for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2016, the underlying FRSSE reporting standard should be withdrawn, and FRS 102 should be amended to make it more suitable for smaller entities, in particular by making fewer disclosures mandatory. So a charity which adopts the FRSSE SORP now may have no choice but to change to the FRS 102 SORP in just one year. The FRC consultation documents can be accessed via tinyurl.com/m73dog5.

One issue of concern is a new requirement in the FRS 102 SORP for employers in multi-employer defined benefit pension schemes to disclose details of any payment plan to pay towards a pension deficit. The Charity Finance Group says this could have a profound effect on the balance sheet of some charities which have such plans in place, giving some the appearance of being insolvent. Organisations which could be in this position should take advice from their auditor or independent examiner.

A significant change in the trustees' report, under both of the new SORPs, is that rather than simply stating that the trustees have considered major risks to the charity, as at present, it must include the principal risks and uncertainties facing the charity.

MHA MacIntyre Hudson accountants recommend that a charity which has a choice about which SORP to adopt should consider:
  • which of the modules [see below] will apply;
  • the charity's existing and future circumstances, transactions and balances;
  • its accounting policies;
  • its desire to disclose certain information, where the two versions differ in what needs to be disclosed;
  • its attitude to changes in accounting and reporting;
  • whether it wants to include cash flow statement (mandatory for the FRS 102 SORP, but not the FRSSE);
  • if the charity has investments, the potential volatility of the net income/expenditure line in the FRS version .
They point out that for a very large number of charities, the practical differences between the two SORPs are likely to be minimal, apart from the need to produce a cash flow statement. Especially for charities that do not have complex financial instruments, are not in a multi-employer pension scheme and are not affected by any of the other complex areas of the FRS 102 SORP, it might be worth going straight to the FRS 102 SORP in 2015, and avoid possibly having to change in a year if the FRSSE SORP is withdrawn. But it is essential for every charity which has a choice to take advice from its accountant or auditor about whether to adopt the FRSSE or FRS 102 SORP.

Having chosen one version or the other, it must then be used consistently. The charity cannot pick and choose which approaches it wants to use.


Resources
The charities SORP website at www.charitysorp.org, includes the SORPs, background information, and guidance on how to select the right SORP.

Helpsheets at www.charitysorp.org/about-the-sorp map each paragraph of SORP 2005 to the relevant paragraph in the new FRS 102 SORP; set out significant changes between SORP 2005 and new FRS 102 SORP; and compare, module by module, the new FRS 102 and FRSSE SORPs.

Some useful briefings are:
  • "SORP 2015", a short briefing from Sayer Vincent accountants at tinyurl.com/o9kbtgd, with links to other resources from Sayer Vincent on how to show legacies and from Spence and Partners on how to show pension liabilities;
  • "Charity SORP 2015: Applying the new accounting rules", an article originally published in Accountancy Live, from Crowe Clark Whitehill at tinyurl.com/kfhn8vo;
  • "The new Charities SORPs", a more detailed briefing from MHA MacIntyre Hudson at www.macintyrehudson.co.uk/node/17764.
The modules
There are 29 modules in each version of the SORP, but very few charities will need to use all of them. Most modules have the same names in both versions, but some names are slightly different, reflecting differences in the underlying reporting standards on which the SORPs are based.

It is hoped that the modular format will make it easier for smaller charities to use. The modules are:
  1. trustees' annual report (the same requirements for both SORPs, so not a factor in deciding which SORP to adopt);
  2. fund accounting (restricted and unrestricted funds);
  3. accounting standards, policies, concepts and principles, including the adjustment of estimates and errors;
  4. statement of financial activities (SOFA);
  5. recognition of income, including legacies, grants and contract income;
  6. donated goods, facilities and services, including volunteers;
  7. recognition of expenditure;
  8. allocating costs by activity in the statement of financial activities;
  9. disclosure of trustee and staff remuneration, related party and other transactions;
  10. balance sheet;
  11. accounting for financial assets and financial liabilities;
  12. write-down of assets to their recoverable amounts [FRSSE version]; impairment of assets [FRS 102 version]. This is where the fair value of an asset — the amount it could be sold for, or the income it will generate if it continues to be used — is less than its depreciated value;
  13. post-balance sheet events [FRSSE version]; events after the end of the reporting period [FRS 102 version];
  14. cash flow statement [FRSSE version]; statement of cash flows [FRS 102 version];
  15. charities established under company law;
  16. presentation and disclosure of grant-making activities;
  17. retirement benefits [FRSSE version]; retirement and post-employment benefits [FRS 102 version];
  18. accounting for heritage assets;
  19. accounting for funds received as agent or as custodian trustee;
  20. total return (investments) - (England and Wales only);
  21. accounting for social investments;
  22. accounting for charities pooling funds for investment;
  23. overview of charity combinations;
  24. accounting for groups and the preparation of consolidated accounts;
  25. branches, linked or connected charities and joint arrangements;
  26. charities as subsidiaries;
  27. charity mergers;
  28. accounting for associates;
  29. accounting for joint ventures.
There are three appendices: glossary of terms; the Charity Accounting (SORP) Committee; and thresholds for the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Even with 29 modules and three appendices, charities may find that some issues are not covered and FRS 102 itself has to be consulted.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


PROPOSED CHANGES IN AUDIT THRESHOLD

Updated 3/8/14. This information updates s.54.2.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In his review of charity law in July 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended that the income level at which charities are required to have their accounts audited should increase from £500,000 to £1 million. The audit threshold for charities with assets valued at £3.26 million should be removed completely.

He recommended that charities with income above £25,000 but below the new audit threshold would be able to have either an independent examination or a full audit. If income is above £250,000 the examiner would have to be qualified to carry out full audits.

In its response in September 2013, the government said it would consult on increasing the threshold for full audit to £1 million, although its preference would be to retain but increase the assets threshold. This is because it believes that charities with significant assets should be subject to a full audit even where their income is low.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


FILING CHARITY ACCOUNTS, REPORTS AND RETURNS

Updated 3/8/14. This information updates ss.54.2.9 & 54.2.10 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Registered charities in England and Wales with annual income over £25,000 are required to send their audited or independently examined annual accounts and trustees' annual report to the Charity Commission within 10 months from the end of their financial year. In addition, charities with income over £10,000 must submit an annual return within the same period. These income thresholds do not apply to charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs), which must submit accounts, reports and returns to the Commission regardless of income.

In his review of charity law in July 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended that the requirement to submit accounts and reporting information should be aligned with the threshold for compulsory charity registration, which should be increased from £5,000 to £25,000, with the further requirement that charities below this threshold claiming tax reliefs should also be required to register. The government did not accept this recommendation, so the registration threshold remains £5,000 (except for charitable incorporated organisations, which have to register with the Commission even if their projected income is below this level). The threshold for submitting annual accounts and reports remains £25,000.

Lord Hodgson also recommended that all compulsorily registered charities should be required to submit their accounts and annual return and they should be publicly available on the Commission website. In its response the government recognised the rationale for this but was reluctant to increase the regulatory burden on small charities, so the thresholds for submission of accounts and returns remain in place.


Scotland
All charities registered with the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) must submit an annual return and signed annual accounts to the regulator within nine months from the end of their financial year, and those with annual income over £25,000 must submit a supplementary monitoring form. At present OSCR publishes information on its online register of charities about a charity's annual income and expenditure and whether it filed its annual return on time. But unlike the Charity Commission, it does not make the actual accounts available via its website.

In its email bulletin in early September 2013, OSCR said it was considering publishing some charity accounts on the register, but there would be wide consultation with the charity sector before any decisions are made. Its annual report in July 2014 said it had asked the Scottish government to consider a change in the law to allow the accounts of all Scottish charities to be published on its website. OSCR's 2014 annual report can be accessed via tinyurl.com/q6s5b4q.


Northern Ireland
Updated 17/11/14.
Under interim regulations which apply to financial years starting on or after 1 April 2014, charities registered with the Charity Commission for Northern Ireland (CCNI) must submit an annual monitoring return to CCNI, along with the charity's annual accounts and, if applicable, the trustees' annual report and the audit report. The monitoring return includes questions about the charity's activities, governance and finances.

Guidance on the interim requirements can be accessed on the CCNI website via tinyurl.com/np2ambt. The Charities (Annual Return) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 can be accessed via tinyurl.com/n48or8s.

From 4 July until 31 October 2014 CCNI consulted on guidance for charities which can choose to produce receipts and payments accounts rather than the more complex accruals accounts. Brief details of the consultation are at tinyurl.com/pdy7wko. CCNI and the Department for Social Development are expected to consult later in 2014 on full accounting and reporting regulations, which will come into effect in 2015.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


LATE FILING OF CHARITY ACCOUNTS, REPORTS AND RETURNS

Updated 4/8/14. This information updates ss.54.2.9 & 54.2.10 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Prior to 2008, the Charity Commission did little about registered charities which failed to submit their annual accounts, reports and returns within the required 10 months from the end of the charity's financial year. In 2008 it started to indicate late filing in red on the charity's entry in the online register of charities, with a daily increasing tally of how many days late a document was.

In 2013 the Commission started getting tougher on "double defaulting" charities which had failed to file their annual documents for two or more of the previous five years. This started on 26 September 2013 with a class inquiry into 12 charities with a last known income over £500,000, which had failed to reply to written and telephone contact from the Commission. Within a week of being named in the Commission's publicity about the inquiry, four of the 12 charities had filed their overdue documents. Magic! By 18 November five more had complied, and the Commission announced that it was starting enforcement action against the remaining three.

On 11 November 2013, 12 double defaulting unincorporated charities with a last known income between £250,000 and £500,000 were added to the inquiry; within a week, three of these had filed their documents. By 27 June 2014, 10 of the original tranche and seven of the second tranche had been removed from the inquiry. leaving seven still in the inquiry, However, one of the charities which had been removed from the class inquiry in the autumn became, in February 2014, the subject of a separate statutory inquiry, after it failed to file its documents for 2012-13 by the due date of 31 January 2014.

In April 2014 the Commission sent final warnings to a further 72 charities with annual income over £250,000; 39 submitted their documents, and the 33 which didn't were added to the class inquiry in April and May. Of these, 17 had filed the missing documents by mid-June and were removed from the inquiry.

By 4 August 2014, of the 57 charities in the inquiry (12+12+33), 20 were still under inquiry.

The Commission emphasises that trustees who do not ensure accounts, reports and returns are filed on time are in default of their legal obligations to file accounting information with the Commission, and this constitutes mismanagement and misconduct in administering the charity. Even if reporting responsibilities are delegated to accountants, the treasurer, a staff member or anyone else, it remains the collective legal duty of all the trustees to ensure the documents are submitted on time.


Sanctions for late filing: England and Wales
The Commission announced in February 2014 that of the nearly 61,000 charities with annual income over £25,000 which must file accounts with the Commission, nearly 9% were late. This is better than in previous years, but is still nowhere near the 99% compliance rate for companies filing their accounts with Companies House.

Companies, including charitable companies, face company law penalties if accounts reach Companies House even one day late. For private companies (those which are not plc's) the penalties range from £150 if the accounts are up to one month late, to £1,500 if they are more than six months late. If the accounts are also late the following year, the penalties for that year are doubled. As well as penalties for the company, the company directors can be fined and get a criminal record for late filing of company annual returns or accounts. In a Charity Commission study in 2011-12, 39% of charitable companies which had not filed their accounts on time with the Charity Commission, had filed them on time with Companies House — even though the Companies House filing deadline is nine months from the end of the financial year, and the Charity Commission deadline is 10 months.

The Commission has said it is hampered in dealing with late filers because it can legally use only a small number of sanctions, and these are linked to a statutory framework and are too heavy-handed. Ultimately it is a criminal offence not to file charity accounts on time, but the Commission cannot prosecute; it has to persuade the director of public prosecutions to do so. According to Third Sector magazine (8 October 2013), there has not been a single prosecution since late filing became an offence in 1993.

In his review of the Charities Act in July 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended sanctions for late filing of accounts and annual returns should include the withdrawal of gift aid, and said the government and Charity Commission should consider the costs, benefits and logistics of introducing late filing fines. The Public Administration Select Committee inquiry into the Charities Act and the regulation of charities in June 2013 supported fines for late filing. In its response to these reports in September 2013, the government said it would explore with the Charity Commission the possibility of fines for late filers, "giving due consideration to the practical difficulties of such a system for the Commission and charities concerned". It also said the primary motive would be to improve compliance, rather than generate funds.

The Commission's consultation from May to July 2012 on whether there should be fines for late filing had suggested that fines could be on a sliding scale based on the charity's income. Consultation responses were inconclusive, with concerns about fines where there might be legitimate reasons why accounts are late, especially for small charities which do not have access to or cannot afford support from auditors. There were also concerns about whether fines would in fact be effective, and about who the fines would be paid to and how they would be used.

Consultation responses were also inconclusive on whether late filers should be suspended from being able to claim gift aid. This would require new legislation, and a high level of communication between the Charity Commission and HM Revenue & Customs. The Commission supports denying gift aid to late filers, but the Charity Finance Group has said it would be inequitable because only about 20% of charities claim gift aid, and different charities claim different amounts.

The Commission has said it would like to have power to disqualify trustees of charities which are persistent late filers. The Commission has power under the Charities Act to remove trustees, and a removed trustee is then disqualified from being a trustee of or for any charity. But the Commission has to give notice to a trustee that s/he is going to be removed, and if the trustee then resigns, the Commission then has no power to disqualify.


Scotland
The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) said in its annual report for 2012-13, published on 18 September 2013, that fewer than 10% of charity accounts are filed late, and about 10% of charities are asked to resubmit accounts which did not include all the required information. Earlier in September, it said in an email bulletin that rather than asking charities to resubmit accounts with errors or omissions, it would in most cases advise on how the accounts should be prepared for the next year.

The 2013 annual report also asked Scottish ministers to consider changing charity law so OSCR has power to remove charities that consistently fail to file annual reports, accounts and returns. It has power to remove charities that are not carrying out any charitable activity — but if charities don't file the required documents, OSCR can't know what they are doing.

The annual report can be accessed via at tinyurl.com/oq2sxzl.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


FILING JOINTLY WITH CHARITY COMMISSION AND COMPANIES HOUSE

Updated 17/11/14. This information updates ss.54.2.9, 54.2.10, 54.3.8 & 54.3.11 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In his review of the Charities Act in July 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended that work by Companies House and the Charity Commission to create a single reporting system for charitable companies should continue as a matter of urgency, and the potential for joint accounting requirements should also be investigated.

The Public Administration Select Committee, in its inquiry into the regulation of charities in May 2013, did not go this far, but recommended that Companies House and the Charity Commission work towards a single filing of annual returns for charities registered with both Companies House and the Commission.

At its public meeting on 3 July 2013, the Commission said the "next evolution" in the filing of accounts would probably be provision for such joint submission. But in its annual report in July 2014, the Commission said its initial work on this had raised real doubts about the affordability of joint electronic submission. However, it is continuing to look at ways of reducing the costs or spreading them over a longer period, and is also looking for other affordable ways to tackle the issue. The Commission 2013-14 annual report can be accessed via tinyurl.com/qa6zy7m.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


LATE FILING OF CHARITY ACCOUNTS

Added 15/12/13. This information updates s.54.2.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Registered charities with annual income over £25,000 are required to send their audited or independently examined annual accounts and trustees' annual report to the Charity Commission within 10 months from the end of their financial year, and charities with income over £10,000 must submit an annual return. Until 2008 the Commission did little about charities which failed to do this, but in 2008 it started to indicate late filing in red on the charity's entry in the online register of charities. But it is now getting tougher.

In his review of charity law in 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended sanctions for late filing of accounts and annual returns should include the withdrawal of gift aid, and said the government and Charity Commission should consider introducing late filing fines.

In a study of 400 charities which filed their annual accounts late in 2011, the Charity Commission found that:

  • 35% of the accounts had been signed before the filing deadline, so could easily have been filed on time;
  • 27% of late filers with annual income over £250,000, and 23% if those with income under £250,000, had previously defaulted at least once;
  • 23% of late filers with income over £250,000 had filed accounts late in all of the previous five years;
  • the accounts of 24% of late filers over £250,000 and 52% of those under £250,000 were classed as poor, meaning they did not comply with SORP, were missing important sections such as the trustees' annual report, or were simple receipts and payments accounts where the charity was above the threshold for having to prepare accrual accounts;
  • 28% of late filers with income over £250,000 were faith/religious groups.
Companies, including charitable companies, face company law penalties if accounts reach Companies House even one day late. For private companies (those which are not plc's) the penalties range from £150 if the accounts are up to one month late, to £1,500 if they are more than six months late. If the accounts are also late the following year, the penalties for that year are doubled. As well as penalties for the company, the company directors can be fined and get a criminal record for late filing of company annual returns or accounts. Of the late filers in the Charity Commission's study that were charitable companies, 39% had filed their accounts with Companies House on time, but not with the Charity Commission (even though the Companies House filing deadline is nine months from the end of the financial year, and the Charity Commission deadline is 10 months).

On the positive side, 86% of all registered charities that were required to file annual accounts with the Charity Commission did so on time in 2011-12.


Getting tough: England and Wales
The Commission has said it is hampered in dealing with late filers because it can legally use only a small number of sanctions, and these are linked to a statutory framework and are too heavy-handed. Ultimately it is a criminal offence not to file charity accounts on time, but the Commission cannot prosecute; it has to persuade the director of public prosecutions to do so. According to Third Sector magazine there has not been a single prosecution since late filing became an offence in 1993.

Short of prosecution — but more than the red banners on late filers' entries on the online register of charities that were introduced in 2008 — the Commission has implemented, or is considering implementing, a number of approaches to discourage late filing. The intention is not only to increase compliance, but also to help the Commission identify charities which are at risk of serious abuse and trustee dishonesty. According to a speech by Commission chief executive in September 2013, "Our experience tells us that defaulting on accounts is often associated with mismanagement and dishonesty." But it is also about ensuring public trust in charities.

The Commission consulted from 29 May to 20 July 2012 on whether there should be fines for late filing, and has suggested that fines would be on a sliding scale based on the charity's income. The results of the consultation were inconclusive, although a survey by Charity Finance Group found that a majority of its members were not opposed to fines. However, there were concerns about fines where there might be legitimate reasons why accounts are late, especially for small charities which do not have access to or cannot afford support from auditors. There were also concerns about whether fines would in fact be effective, and about who the fines would be paid to and how they would be used.

The government said on
5 September 2013 it would explore with the Charity Commission the possibility of fines for late filers, "giving due consideration to the practical difficulties of such a system for the Commission and charities concerned". It also said the primary motive would be to improve compliance, rather than generate funds.

Responses were also inconclusive on whether late filers should be suspended from being able to claim gift aid. This would require new legislation, and a high level of communication between the Charity Commission and HM Revenue & Customs. The Commission supports denying gift aid to late filers, but the Charity Finance Group has said it would be inequitable because only about 20% of charities claim gift aid, and different charities claim different amounts.

Another consultation suggestion was that there should be incentives for charities which file on time. This was not supported in the responses.

The Commission has acknowledged that it in its efforts to support and assist trustees, it has too often given them the benefit of the doubt and has allowed them too long to put things right or respond to the Commission's requests. So it has said it will get tougher in these situations. The Commission's head of investigations and enforcement, Michelle Russell, said in March 2013 that the Commission has become much tougher on late filers, and takes enforcement action if the trustees do not submit accounts even when required to do so. "We give the trustees a chance to rectify the problem", she said, "but if it is not rectified we take enforcement action and we will use it as evidence that the charity no longer exists." A charity which no longer exists can be removed from the register and its assets distributed to another charity or charities. Where the Commission is investigating a late filer for other reasons, the late filing is added to the investigation.

In April 2013 Sarah Atkinson, head of information and communication, said the Commission was considering actively advising the public not to give to late filers. She said this could include messages on the charity's entry on the online register of charities, general advice in Commission publications, partnerships with fundraising bodies, and possibly "naming and shaming" individual charities.

In September 2013 Sam Younger said it would closely examine accounts that are qualified by an auditor or independent examiner, and would indicate on the online register of charities when a charity's accounts are qualified [see Changes to charity annual returns, below].

Also in September 2013 the Commission launched a class action against 12 charities with last known income over £500,000 which had failed to file annual reports and accounts or annual return for at least two of the previous five years. This followed identifying and contacting 86 charities, 12 of which remained in default as of 23 September. These 12 were then faced with a formal legal direction to trustees to meet their reporting requirements within a specified period, with threats that continued non-compliance could lead to the Commission making a referral to the police for criminal prosecution and/or appointing an interim manager and recovering the costs from the trustees personally, and public naming of the charities. Not surprisingly, nine of the 12 charities had managed to get their documents in to the Commission by mid-November. The Commission is taking (unspecified) enforcement action against the remaining three.

Meanwhile, another 12 charities were added to the class action on 11 November 2013. These had a last known income between £250,000 and £500,000, and had not filed documents for at least the last two financial years. One of the new charities has the same trustees as one of the three which is now subject to enforcement action.

The Commission has said it would like to have power to disqualify trustees of charities which are persistent late filers. The Commission has power under the Charities Act to remove trustees, and a removed trustee is then disqualified from being a trustee of or for any charity. But the Commission has to give notice to a trustee that s/he is going to be removed, and if the trustee then resigns, the Commission then has no power to disqualify.

Alongside the Charity Commission's pleas for charities to file their annual reports and accounts on time, the Directory of Social Change asked grant making trusts whether they make use of the Commission's website as part of their assessment process, and if so, whether the red "Documents overdue" banner would deter them from making a grant. Of 263 funders, 53% said they check the applicants' filing history on the Commission's website, and 17% said they would automatically reject an application from a charity with overdue accounts. The DSC report, Accounts count is at www.dsc.org.uk/policyandresearch/research.

A further survey, commissioned by the Charity Commission and the Fundraising Standards Board and carried out by ICM, found that 76% of adults would not donate to a charity which had failed to submit its accounts and returns to the Commission. Information about this survey, published on
9 December 2013, is on the Commission website via tinyurl.com/o44mljm.

Scotland
The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) said in its annual report for 2012-13, published on 18 September 2013, that fewer than 10% of charity accounts are filed late, and about 10% of charities are asked to resubmit accounts which did not include all the required information. Earlier in September, it said in an email bulletin that rather than asking charities to resubmit accounts with errors or omissions, it would in most cases advise on how the accounts should prepared for the next year.

The annual report also said Scottish charity law should be changed so OSCR has power to remove charities that consistently fail to file annual reports, accounts and returns. It has power to remove charities that are not carrying out any charitable activity — but if charities don't file the required documents, OSCR can't know what they are doing.

The OSCR annual report is at tinyurl.com/pj3t7w5.

At present, OSCR publishes information on its online register of charities about a charity's annual income and expenditure and whether it filed its annual return on time. But unlike the Charity Commission, it does not make the actual accounts available via its website. In its email bulletin in early September 2013, OSCR said it is considering publishing some charity accounts on the register, but there would be wide consultation with the charity sector before any decisions are made.

CHANGES TO CHARITY ANNUAL RETURNS AND ONLINE REGISTER OF CHARITIES

Updated 17/11/14. This information updates s.54.2.10 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
All charities registered with the Charity Commission with annual income of £10,000 or above, and all charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs) regardless of income, must submit an online annual return within 10 months from the end of the financial year.

Changes to the 2015 return
Following a consultation from 17 June to 12 August 2014, the Charity Commission announced changes to the 2015 annual return on 23 October 2014. The changes will take effect for financial years ending on or after 1 January 2015.

Three new questions, to be answered by all charities which complete the return, will be:

  • In the reporting period, how much income did you receive from contracts from central or local government to deliver services, and grants from central or local government?
    This information will be displayed on the online register of charities as a proportion of the charity's total income.
  • Does your charity have a policy on paying its staff?
    This replaces the proposed question on whether the charity has a written policy on remuneration of executive staff.
  • Has your charity reviewed its financial controls during the reporting period?
    The proposed question asked whether the charity "had carried out a review". (I'm not sure what the difference is between "reviewed" and "carried out a review"...)
The Commission will produce guidance to accompany the questions, including clear guidance on what it means by public services and grants, and signposting to its guidance and checklist on internal financial controls. It will also review its guidance on questions that are already on the return.

A proposal to include a question on campaigning costs elicited considerable opposition and concern about how campaigning would be defined. The Commission acknowledged it would not be possible to develop guidance in time for this question to be included in the 2015 return, but is exploring whether it should be included in the 2016 return. Umbrella bodies NCVO, NAVCA and ACEVO immediately criticised the decision to keep it under consideration, with Sir Stuart Etherington of NCVO saying, "There would be no logic to putting forward the same proposal in a year's time. Trying to put a meaningful single figure on campaigning will be as impossible then as it is now."

The most significant proposed change would have required charities with annual income between £10,000 and £500,000 (and CIOs even if below £10,000)) to provide key financial information, including voluntary income, income from investments, remaining income not analysed elsewhere, total income, spending on charitable activities, spending on raising funds, remaining spending not analysed, and total spending. At present, only charities with annual income above £500,000 must provide this detailed breakdown on the return.

The Commission accepted that this requirement would have a significant impact on charities, especially smaller ones, so the question will not be introduced in 2015. However, the Commission will continue working towards a technical solution that will allow the information to be submitted, displayed and used more easily.

The consultation documents, including the Charity Commission's responses to the consultation and its reasons for making or not making changes to the return, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/o335e45. The Commission's press release is at tinyurl.com/kgxcuqz.


Changes to the 2014 return
Changes to the 2014 annual return apply to returns for financial years ending on or after 1 January 2014.

The home page for information about annual returns is at tinyurl.com/mqa2ff8. The return must now be completed online, and non-CIO charities with annual income under £10,000 must use the new form to report changes to the charity's details. CIOs must submit the full return even if their income is under £10,000.

The 2014 return includes the following new questions:
  • whether the charity pays its trustees for trustee duties;
  • whether the charity raises funds from the public;
  • whether the charity works with a commercial participator (a commercial businesses that engages in a promotional venture to raise funds for the charity), and if so whether the charity has an agreement with the participator, as it is obliged to do;
  • whether the charity has a trading subsidiary;
  • whether the charity is regulated by or registered with Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission, the Homes and Communities Agency or the Financial Conduct Authority;
  • whether the charity has policies for risk management, investment, safeguarding vulnerable beneficiaries, managing conflicts of interest, volunteer management, and complaints handling.
The return includes an optional text box that the charity can use to describe its aims for the year and corresponding achievements, with this information displayed on the register of charities.


The redesigned register of charities
Much of the new information on the 2014 return and the 2013 return [see below] will be displayed on the Commission's register of charities, which is being redesigned to include a more detailed and flexible search function. The redesigned register was expected to be launched at the end of July 2014. Since then the Commission's website, including the register, has moved to the Gov.uk website at www.gov.uk/government/organisations/charity-commission (though you can still get to it at www.charitycommission.gov.uk, which is a lot shorter). As far as I can tell the register is still the old one, without the responses to the new questions.

As well as responses from the 2013 and 2014 returns, the online register will also include:
  • whether the charity is a member of the Fundraising Standards Board;
  • whether the accounts have been qualified by an auditor or independent examiner (i.e. if a charity's auditor/examiner makes a statement that there is reason to believe that proper records were not kept, the accounts are not in accordance with the records, or there has been material expenditure or action outside the charity's objects or trusts, or if a company's auditor/examiner cannot state the that accounts have been properly prepared and give a true and fair view of the financial situation);
  • if the charity is insolvent, in administration or subject to enforcement action for non-submission of accounts;
  • if the charity is subject to enforcement action for non-submission of accounts;
  • other information held by the Commission or others that is "of interest to the public", which could include, for example, whether the charity was created through a merger or was set up to receive the assets of an unincorporated charity.
The Commission says it has been "mindful of getting the balance right between the need for charities to be transparent without making the task of completing the annual return too much of a burden".


Changes to the 2013 return
The 2014 changes follow changes in the 2013 return, which included new questions on whether the charity is registered for gift aid, whether it owns or leases any land or buildings, and whether any of the charity's land or buildings are used for the charity's purposes. Questions which had been optional, on numbers of volunteers, and on overseas activities and the amount spent in (or spent to benefit) each country outside the UK, became mandatory in 2013.

Potential issues for charities working overseas
Information added to the return in 2013 will, like the new 2014 information, be included on the revamped online register. Solicitors Bates Wells and Braithwaite have been corresponding with the Commission since January 2013 about concerns that details of which countries a charity operates in, and its in-country spend, could potentially be very sensitive information for some faith based or human rights organisations. In February 2013 the Commission assured BWB it would find a way for such information to be provided on a confidential basis.

In its legal update on 20 August 2014, BWB said it had been told that information already provided by charities to the Commission about spend in-country was expected to be published on the register from late August 2014. The Commission had said that any charity concerned about publication of this information should apply for a dispensation, using the general enquiries form on the Commission's website, with "Annual return 2013/2014: Application for dispensation to publish information on overseas spending".

The application should include details of countries and expenditure the charity does not want to appear on the register, with information to show that disclosure would be likely to:
  • put a charity's property at undue risk or harm; and/or
  • have an acute detrimental impact on a particular charity, its operations and public confidence in it; and/or
  • have an acute detrimental impact on a particular individual or group of individuals, for example, by creating a significant risk to personal or public safety.
The Commission has said it will amend the annual return guidance to make clear that charities can apply for a dispensation.

For more information about this issue see the BWB legal updates for 20 August 2014 at tinyurl.com/qzxmyj4 and for 9 July 2014 at tinyurl.com/p7h6lq4, and a Third Sector article on 3 July at tinyurl.com/pbq565s.


Background to the changes
The changes to the 2103 and 2014 returns, and proposed changes for 2015, follow Lord Hodgson's recommendations in his review of the Charities Act in July 2012, that the Charity Commission should continue to ensure that the information available about the charities on its register meets public needs and demand and is regularly reviewed to ensure it continues to meet these requirements.

They also implement, at least to some extent, changes recommended by the Public Administration Select Committee, in its inquiry into the Charities Act and the regulation of charities in May 2013. This recommended that the Charity Commission should require charities to declare in their annual returns how much of their spending has gone on political and communications work, and how much of their income was received from public or government sources in either grant income or other forms of remuneration, and how much was received in the form of private donations. The Commission's consultation in 2014 referred to campaigning rather than to political and communications work, and to public service delivery rather than public or government sources. But none of these terms were defined in the consultation documents.


Summary information return [not any more]
As recommended by Lord Hodgson's review of charity law in July 2012, the summary information return (SIR) which charities with annual income over £1 million had to complete, has been abolished for financial years ending on or after 1 January 2014.

Identification of "small charities" [not]
In his review of charity law in July 2012, Lord Hodgson recommended that all registered charities with an annual income of less than £25,000 should be identified on the Commission’s register as "small" alongside their registration number. The intention of this was to improve the public perception that these charities are subject to little proactive regulatory oversight — and alert potential donors to this fact. In its response in September 2013, the government did not accept this recommendation.

Key risk indicators [probably not]
Another recommendation from Lord Hodgson was that all information required to be submitted by charities should be combined into a single document for simplicity, and the first page of this should be a list of key risk indicators to help the Commission identify a sample of charities for further investigation. The completed list should also be published on the charity’s register entry to aid public understanding and exercise of judgment.

The suggested indicators for this "traffic light" system were whether the charity has remunerated staff; whether it receives local or national government funding and, if so, what proportion of total funding this represents; whether the charity raises money from the public and if so, whether it is a member of the Fundraising Standards Board; whether the charity spends money or has operations overseas and if so, in which countries; whether any trustees have served for more than nine years in total; whether any of the trustees are paid; and whether the charity has ever been fined, or submitted a serious incident report, to any of its regulators. Many of these indicators are now included, or will be, on the register of charities.

In its response to the Hodgson report in September 2013 the government liked the idea of a one-page information summary on the charity's register entry. The Charity Commission said it would look into this, but "it may not be deliverable".


Charging for filing annual returns (not)
Lord Hodgson's review in July 2012 recommended that the government should work with the Charity Commission to develop a fair and proportionate system of charging for filing annual returns. The Public Administration Select Committee's review in May 2013 did not support the proposal to charge a filing fee, saying it amounted to a tax on charities. The government, in its response to the two reports in September 2013, did not support a filing fee.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


NEW REPORTING STANDARDS FOR COMPANIES

Updated 3/8/14. This information updates s.54.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A new financial reporting standard for companies (FRS 102) will come into effect for accounting periods starting on or after 1 January 2015, along with a revised statement of recommended practice for charities (SORP) based on the new FRS [see Two new charities SORPs, above].

Large global companies will have to continue to comply with international financial reporting standards (IFRS) for large companies. But for other UK companies, most current accounting standards for the UK and Republic of Ireland will be replaced with the single FRS 102. FRS 102 is based on the IFRS for small and medium-sized entities.

The financial reporting standard for smaller entities (FRSSE) will be retained for companies which qualify as smaller: meeting any two of annual income not exceeding £6.5 million, balance sheet total not exceeding £3.26 million, and average number of employees not exceeding 50. Non-charitable smaller companies will have a choice whether to use FRS 102 or FRSSE, and charitable companies which meet the current criteria for FRSSE will be able to choose whether to use the new charities SORP based on FRSSE or the one based on FRS 102 [see SORP article above].

FRS 102, as approved by the Financial Reporting Council in March 2013, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/bn6n4c8. There are many summaries listed on Google but I don't know enough to assess them. Finance specialists will have received many analyses and summaries of FRS 102; non-specialists should take advice from their company's accountant or auditor about how their company will be affected.

Although FRS 102 will come into effect only for financial years ending on or after 1 January 2015, comparative figures for the previous financial year (ending on or after 1 January 2014) will need to be prepared in the same format. So it is important to be aware of relevant changes during the 2014 or 2014-15 financial year.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


SIMPLER FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR MICRO-ENTITIES

Updated 3/8/14. This information updates 54.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For financial years ending on or after 30 September 2013, micro-entities which are not charities can choose to submit simplified micro-entity accounts to Companies House. A micro-entity is a registered company which meets any two of the following three criteria: turnover not more than £632,000, balance sheet total not more than £316,000, and employing no more than 10 people on average during the financial year. The statutory definition explicitly excludes companies which are charities.

A micro-entity must submit a balance sheet to Companies House each year, and may (but does not have to) also submit the profit and loss account for that year, directors’ report, auditor’s report (unless the company is claiming exemption from audit as a small company), and any notes to the accounts.

The balance sheet must contain a statement in a prominent position above the director’s signature and printed name that the accounts have been prepared in accordance with the micro-entity provisions. This statement should appear in the original accounts as well as the copy sent to Companies House.

If the company has opted not to file a directors’ report and/or a profit and loss account, a statement should also appear on the balance sheet sent to Companies House that the accounts have been delivered in accordance with the provisions applicable to companies subject to the small companies regime.

The rules for micro-entity accounts are explained on the Companies House website at www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gp2.shtml#ch6.

Implementation of these provisions follows a consultation by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Financial Reporting Council from August to October 2011 on Simpler reporting for the smallest businesses, and a BIS consultation on specific proposals in March 2013.

The Small Companies (Micro-Entities' Accounts) Regulations 2013 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/3008/made.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR MICRO-COMPANIES AND MICRO-BUSINESSES

Added 1/4/12. This information updates 54.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In February 2012, the European Council agreed proposals for a significant simplification of accounts and reporting for micro-entities. As part of this it agreed a revised definition of a micro-entity as a company (a micro-company) or unincorporated business (a micro-business) which meets any two of the following three criteria: turnover less than €700,000 (approximately £600,000), net assets less than €350,000 (approximately £300,000), and employing no more than 10 people on average.

This paves the way for future implementation in the UK of proposals outlined in the Simpler reporting for the smallest businesses discussion paper issued by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Financial Reporting Council on 25 August and consulted on until 30 October 2011. The key proposal is that micro-entities will be able to produce a single set of accounts meeting the requirements of both company law and tax law, instead of two separate sets as many micro-entities have to prepare at present. The government said on 23 March 2012 that responses to the discussion paper will be used to further develop its proposals.

The discussion paper suggests that micro-entities that are now required under company law to prepare a profit and loss account on an accruals basis could prepare a trading statement on the receipts and payments basis; would not have to account for stock, changes in working capital, and changes in the value of fixed assets; could prepare a simplified statement of position rather than a balance sheet; and could prepare a simplified annual return. The financial information prepared in this simplified form could then be used as the basis for their annual tax return to HMRC.

Para.2.2 in the discussion paper says the new provisions would apply only to entities that trade for profit. They would therefore not include charities and other organisations that do not trade for profit. This could create an anomaly where a charity's trading subsidiary meeting the micro-entity criteria would be entitled to prepare simplified accounts, while a much tinier parent body, as a charitable company not trading for profit, would still have to prepare its accounts and reports under the provisions for small or smaller companies. This will be something to watch out for when the consultation on future proposals is issued.

The BIS/FRC discussion paper can be accessed on the BIS website via tinyurl.com/bvymy44.


COMPANY ANNUAL REPORTS

Updated 4/8/14. This information updates 54.3.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For financial years ending on or after 30 September 2013, the annual reports of large and medium companies — including charitable companies — must include both a strategic report and the directors' report. Medium and large companies are generally those with a turnover of at least £6.5 million.

The strategic report must cover the company's strategy, business model, principal risks and challenges, and must include certain specified information. It replaces the previous business review.

The Charity Commission and the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR), as the joint SORP making body, issued guidance on 28 January 2014 for charitable companies which must comply with the new rules. The guidance says that for a charity which is a company, the strategic report should provide context for the related financial statements, provide an analysis of the charity's past performance, and provide insight into the charity's main objectives and strategies, and the principal risks it faces and how they might affect future prospects. Affected charities should incorporate the strategic report (as required under company law) into the trustees' annual report and accounts (as required under charity law). In approving the trustees' annual report, the trustees must also explicitly approve the strategic report.

The Commission/OSCR guidance can be accessed via tinyurl.com/ptf45ux.

On 9 June 2014, the Financial Reporting Council published non-mandatory guidance on preparing company strategic reports. This is aimed at quoted companies, but is intended to serve as best practice for all companies preparing strategic reports. The FRC guidance can be accessed via tinyurl.com/nd98xd8.

The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1970/made.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


COMPANY ANNUAL REPORTS

Added 1/4/12. This information updates 54.3.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills announced on 28 February 2012 that proposals to simplify company annual reports and improve transparency, originally intended to come into effect for accounting years beginning on or after 1 October 2012, will not come into force until 1 April 2013. The delay is to give companies more time to adjust.

The consultation on narrative reporting, which took place from 19 September to 25 November 2011, proposed dividing the annual report into two separate documents: a strategic report setting out financial results, the company’s business model and strategy, risks, remuneration, and environmental and social issues; and an online annual directors' statement which would provide more detailed information. The government's response to the consultation, published on 27 March 2012, says that the proposals were widely supported, and it will work with shareholders and others to develop the proposals.

The consultation documents and government response are on the BIS website via tinyurl.com/d2vt6fa.


COMMUNITY INTEREST COMPANY ANNUAL REPORTS

Added 16/10/12. This information updates 54.3.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 October 2012, the Community Interest Company(Amendment) Regulations 2012 make clear that directors of community interest companies (CICs) must deliver a directors' annual report to the CIC regulator, regardless of any exemption which might apply to accounts and reports by directors of non-CIC companies.

The regulations are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/2335/made.


COMPANY AUDIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK

Updated 16/10/12. This information updates s.54.3.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For accounting years ending on or after 1 October 2012, more small companies (but not charitable companies) are eligible for exemption from audit, and many companies are able to change their accounting framework.

A company is classed as small for accounting purposes if it meets any two of the following criteria: average number of employees during the year no more than 50, balance sheet total no more than £3.2 million, and turnover no more than £6.5 million. But for the purpose of audit exemption, prior to 1 October it was classed as small only if it met both the balance sheet and turnover requirements. Now the audit criteria are aligned with those for accounting, i.e. any two of the three criteria.

The new audit thresholds will apply to non-charitable companies, including community interest companies and charities' trading subsidiaries, but will not apply to charitable companies.

The new legislation also exempts many subsidiary companies from mandatory statutory audit and dormant subsidiary companies from statutory audit, if specified criteria are met including that the parent company guarantees the debts of the subsidiary.

Companies which have been preparing accounts under international financial reporting standards (IFRS) may, in many cases, change their accounting framework to UK generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

The Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit Exemptions and Change of Accounting Framework) Regulations 2012 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/2301/made.


CHANGES TO COMPANY FORMS AND FILING

Updated 16/10/12. This information updates ss.18.5, 54.3.8 & 54.3.11 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In November 2010, Companies House announced that it expected all incorporations and filings of annual returns, accounts and the main company changes for most types of company to be done electronically by March 2013. However, it announced in September 2011 that because of the government's commitment not to increase the regulatory burden on small businesses, mandatory electronic filing would not go ahead at present. Instead, Companies House will encourage electronic filing, particularly for annual accounts, and will reconsider mandatory electronic filing when the moratorium on new regulation for small businesses ends in 2014.

Filing fees
An application to make a director's residential address unavailable for public inspection (forms SR01-SR03) went up in April 2011 from £15 to £55. At the same time the fee for monitoring a company was removed.

A full list of Companies House forms can be accessed via tinyurl.com/6q5hrv2, and a full list of fees via tinyurl.com/7gkf2ku.

Correcting errors
From 6 April 2011, Companies House allows mistakes made since 1 October 2009 on certain forms to be corrected by submitting another form, called a second filing. Each second filing must be accompanied by a form RP04. The forms which can be corrected are:
  • AP01, AP02, AP03, AP04: appointment of director, corporate director, secretary or corporate secretary;
  • CH01, CH02, CH03, CH04: change of details of director, corporate director, secretary or corporate secretary;
  • TM01, TM02: termination of appointment of director or secretary;
  • SH01: return of allotment of shares;
With a second filing, the original (incorrect) form remains registered at Companies House register. Separate action is needed to remove it from the register.

Companies House searches
From
1 October 2012, there is no longer a £1 charge for the company appointment report, which includes the incorporation date and registered office address, key filing dates, company status details, company secretary and directors (excluding business occupation), and recent filing history.

The October 2012 changes to fees are in the Registrar of Companies (Fees)(Companies,Overseas Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships) Regulations 2012 at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1907/made.

THE END OF COMPANY ANNUAL RETURNS?

Added 17/11/14. This information updates s.54.3.11 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Following a consultation from 7 October to 22 November 2013 on company filing requirements, the government announced on 21 April 2014 that it intends to remove the requirement for companies to complete an annual return at a set point each year. Instead, companies will be able to confirm, at any point in the year, that their company information is correct.

Companies which make changes inside a 12-month period, for example if they notify Companies House that a director has been appointed, will be asked whether they wish to check and confirm other information at the same time. If they do so, no further action will be needed for a further 12-month period, unless the company needs to notify a new change to Companies House.

The legislation to bring in this change won't happen until there is parliamentary time for amendments to the Companies Act 2006.

The consultation documents and government response can be accessed via tinyurl.com/pex5xqu.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about annual accounts, reports and returns (VSLH3 chapter 54)


CHANGES TO COMPANY RETURNS, FORMS AND FILING

Updated 16/10/12. This information updates ss.18.5, 54.3.8 & 54.3.11 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In November 2010, Companies House announced that it expected all incorporations and filings of annual returns, accounts and the main company changes for most types of company to be done electronically by March 2013. However, it announced in September 2011 that because of the government's commitment not to increase the regulatory burden on small businesses, mandatory electronic filing would not go ahead at present. Instead, Companies House will encourage electronic filing, particularly for annual accounts, and will reconsider mandatory electronic filing when the moratorium on new regulation for small businesses ends in 2014.

Filing fees
From 1 October 2012, the fee for electronic filing of a company annual return went down from £14 to £13. The fee for paper filing remains £40.

A full list of Companies House forms can be accessed via tinyurl.com/6q5hrv2, and a full list of fees via tinyurl.com/7gkf2ku. The changes to fees are in the Registrar of Companies (Fees)(Companies,Overseas Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships) Regulations 2012 at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1907/made.

Correcting errors
From 6 April 2011, Companies House allows mistakes made since 1 October 2009 on certain forms to be corrected by submitting another form, called a second filing. Each second filing must be accompanied by a form RP04. The forms which can be corrected include the AR01: annual return.

With a second filing, the original (incorrect) form remains registered at Companies House register. Separate action is needed to remove it from the register.



| Home | About Sandy Adirondack | Legal update for voluntary organisations | Legal update: Employment, equal ops, health & safety | Legal update: Managing the organisation | Open training | In-house training | Consulting | Mentoring | Books by post |


© 2011 Sandy Adirondack.
To avoid spamming, an email address is not given on screen. If you can't see the word 'Sandy' or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is sandy at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.

SANDY ADIRONDACK
Governance and legal training and consultancy
for the voluntary sector

39 Gabriel House, 10 Odessa Street, London SE16 7HQ
Tel 020 7232 0726; fax 020 7237 8117
Email:
Web: www.sandy-a.co.uk