VSLH3 Chapter 40: Health and safety
H&S adviceline and resources
(updated 26/4/10)
First corporate manslaughter case
(added 2/4/10)
New H&S poster and leaflet
(added 14/6/09)
Template for H&S policy and risk assessment
(added 26/4/10)
Risk assessment for pregnant workers
(added 26/4/10)
Good practice for school and youth club trips
(updated 26/4/10)
Fire safety
(added 2/4/10)
You can also find legal updates for voluntary organisations on the websites of Bates Wells and Braithwaite Solicitors at www.bwbllp.com and the Charity Team at Russell-Cooke Solicitors at www.russell-cooke.co.uk, and information about changes in tax and finance law on the Sayer Vincent website at www.sayervincent.co.uk.
EMPLOYMENT
"WEEKLY PAY" AND UNFAIR DISMISSAL AWARDS
FOR 2010-11
Updated 15/2/10. This information is included in ss.35.7.1, 37.4.2 and various other sections in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook.
For dismissals on or after 1 February 2010 the maximum compensatory award for unfair dismissal is decreased, for the first time ever, from £66,200 to £65,300. This is because this award is based on the annual change in the retail price index in the previous September, which was minus 1.4% in September 2009.
Also from 1 February 2010 the limit on guarantee payments when an employee is not provided with work is decreased from £21.50 to £21.20, and the minimum compensation for a worker excluded or expelled from a trade union goes down from £7,300 to £7,200.
Some other awards that would ordinarily have changed on 1 February 2010 were increased on 1 October 2009. The maximum "weekly pay" for calculating statutory redundancy pay and certain other entitlements was increased then from £350 to £380. For unfair dismissal claims where the effective date of termination is on or after 1 October 2009, the maximum basic award was increased from £10,500 to £11,400. These changes will remain in place at least until 1 February 2011.
The Employment Rights (Revision of Limits) Order 2009, setting out the February changes, is at
www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_2009274_en_1, and the October 2009 changes are at
www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20083055_en_1
and www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20091903_en_1.
Go back to contents
INTERNSHIPS
Added 21/4/10. This information updates ss.25.6.1 & 26.4.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development's Internships that work was published in December 2009 and covers how interns and employers can get the most out of internships, how much to pay interns, recruitment, induction, supervision and support, and how to structure short- and long-term internships. The guide is at www.cipd.co.uk/publicpolicy/_internships-that-work.htm.
There is no statutory or common law definition of intern. Depending on the precise nature of a so-called internship, an intern may legally be a student on work experience or a work placement linked to their course; a volunteer; a 'worker' entitled to minimum wage, working time rights including paid holiday, and protection under the equal opportunities legislation; or an employee entitled not only to workers' rights but also the full range of employment rights.
Unless interns are working under a contract and are therefore legally workers or employees, they are not entitled to minimum wage or working time rights, and may not even be protected against discrimination. Intern Aware is a campaign to promote fairer access to internships by ensuring that all interns are paid at least the national minimum wage. It is at www.internaware.org.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about employment status (VSLH2 chapter 22)
Go to archived items about employment rights (VSLH2 chapter 23)
RIGHTS OF AGENCY TEMPS
Updated 22/11/09. This information updates s.26.4.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government announced in October 2009 its intention to implement on 1 October 2011 the EU Agency Workers Directive (also called the Temporary Agency Workers Directive). This entitles agency temps to the same basic employment rights as if they had been directly employed, in relation to pay, holidays, working time, rest periods and maternity leave.
In the UK agency temps already have most of the relevant statutory rights from Day 1, but the draft Agency Workers Regulations will entitle them to the remaining statutory rights, and after they have worked for an employer for 12 weeks in a given job, they will be entitled to the same contractual rights as directly hired workers. The directive does not give temps a right to sick pay (although in the UK they are entitled to statutory sick pay) or occupational pension rights.
Under the draft regulations, agency temps will be entitled, from Day 1, to equal access to collective facilities such as canteens, childcare facilities and transport services; information about the employer's vacancies; and increased protection for new and expectant mothers including time off for ante-natal appointments and adjustments to working conditions and working hours.
The government consulted on the draft regulations until 11 December 2009. Consultation details are at www.berr.gov.uk/consultations/page53060.html. The draft regulations are included in the consultation booklet.
The directive can be accessed via tinyurl.com/7dep4h.
From 22 September 2009 the minimum wage helpline was replaced by a new pay and work rights helpline for workers and employers at 0800 917 2368, covering agency workers' rights, minimum wage and working time rights.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about employment rights (VSLH2 chapter 23)
RIGHT TO WORK IN THE UK
Updated 21/4/10. This information updates s.29.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 29 February 2008, rules on people from outside the European Economic Area (EU + Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) and Switzerland working in the UK were significantly tightened. The main rules affecting voluntary organisations as employers are set out below.
Checking right to work
Under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, it is no longer enough for the employer simply to check and keep a copy of an employee's passport or other relevant documents at the beginning of employment. If a person who is hired on or after 29 February 2008 has limited leave to remain in the UK, the checks have to be repeated every 12 months. In addition, employers have to take action if they become aware at any stage that a person is working illegally. An employer can be fined £10,000 for each person found to be working illegally, unless they can show that they saw and kept a copy of the relevant documentation. An employer who knowingly hires someone who is not entitled to work in the UK could be subject to an unlimited fine and prison sentence of up to two years. The initial checks must be done before the person is employed, and to avoid allegations of racial discrimination should be carried out for all potential employees.
From 24 November 2009 an ID card issued under the Identity Cards Act 2006 is acceptable documentation. A copy must of kept of both sides of the card. This provision is in the Immigration (Restrictions on Employment)(Amendment) Order 2009 at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20092908_en_1.
Points-based system
Also under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, the right to enter or remain in Britain is now based on a five-tier points system similar to Australia. Any employer who wants to hire or continue to hire a migrant worker (any worker who is not from the EEA or Switzerland) in tier 2 or in most tier 5 categories has to register first with the UK Border Agency as a licensed sponsor. Registration as a sponsor is also required before any existing migrant worker's work permit in these tiers can be changed, extended or renewed.
After registering, the sponsor then provides a certificate of sponsorship which enables the worker to apply to enter or remain in the UK. This decision as to whether the worker is admitted depends on the number of points the worker has. Points are based on the worker's skills (including aptitude, experience and age), the need for those skills in the UK economy, proficiency in English, prospective earnings, and funds available for maintenance.
Sponsors are responsible for workers they sponsor and must, amongst other things, inform the Border Agency if the worker does not turn up for the job, or is absent from work without consent for more than 10 days. Detailed HR systems must be in place to monitor all sponsored workers.
The five tiers are:
-
Tier 1 for highly skilled individuals such as scientists started operating in early 2008. Applicants for admission to the UK or the right to remain in the UK under tier 1 do not need a job offer before they apply, and their permission to work is not linked to a particular job or type of work. The academic and financial qualification rules for tier 1 were changed on 31 March 2009 and again on 6 April 2010.
-
Tier 2 is for skilled individuals such as teachers, social workers and nurses. It came into effect on 27 November 2008. This is the tier most likely to affect voluntary organisations. Any organisation which wants to hire a skilled worker from outside the EEA or Switzerland, or who will want to extend existing workers whose work permit ends, must register far enough in advance to ensure their sponsorship application can be processed in time for them to issue the worker with the necessary certificate of sponsorship.
Unless the occupation is on the government's list of shortage occupations, the employer can issue a certificate of sponsorship only if it has conducted a resident labour market test. This means the employer has advertised at JobCentre Plus and in at least one other specified medium and could not fill the post from within the UK, EEA or Switzerland. From 14 December 2009 the advertising period is four weeks for all jobs, but the weeks do not have to run continuously. This means it is possible to advertise for two weeks, and if there is no suitable resident worker, then advertise for a further two weeks.
The list of shortage occupations for which the resident labour market test is not necessary was revised on 15 June 2009 and 12 November 2009. The changes most likely to affect voluntary organisations are removal of all social workers except those working in children/family services; changes to the list of medical and health-related occupations; changes to the skills criteria for care assistants, home carers and chefs; and the inclusion of special needs teachers, skilled orchestral musicians and contemporary dancers. The Migration Advisory Committee recommended in March 2010 that orchestral musicians be removed from the shortage list except for leaders or principals of internationally recognised UK orchestras.
Tier 2 also covers intra-company transfers, sports people, ministers of religion and some other religious workers, for whom different rules apply. The rules on intra-company transfers were changed on 6 April 2010.
From 6 January 2010, tier 2 workers, ministers of religion, sports persons, representatives of overseas businesses and dependants must apply for a compulsory ID card when renewing their visa.
-
Tier 5 for temporary workers and youth mobility schemes also came into effect on 27 November 2008. The provisions for temporary workers cover creative and sporting workers coming to the UK for up to 12 months, charity workers coming to the UK to do unpaid voluntary work for a charity for up to 12 months, religious workers who do not meet the criteria for entry under tier 2, workers on government authorised exchange schemes, and employees of overseas governments and international organisations.
Temporary workers need to have a licensed sponsor. For those on exchange schemes, the sponsor is the body which manages the scheme, rather than the individual employer. Youth mobility schemes are for young people aged 18-31 from Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, coming to the UK for up to 24 months. The individual's national government is the sponsor.
-
Tier 4 is for students who are not from the European Economic Area or Switzerland, and came into effect from 31 March 2009. Their university or college must be registered as a sponsor. The rules for sponsors and migrant students were changed from 6 April 2010, including creation of a new "highly trusted sponsor" scheme.
-
Tier 3 is a limited quota system for low-skilled workers to fill temporary shortages in specific industries. It is brought into effect only when needed, and is not in effect at present.
Guidance for sponsors
Information about the points-based system and sponsorship is available from the UK Border Agency at www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/employers/points.
Short-term visitors
New rules were introduced from 27 November 2008 for a range of visas for short-term (up to six months) visitors to the UK, covering business visitors (coming to attend conferences or carry out specific work-related activities); sports visitors for specific events; entertainer visitors to take part in certain events (including charity shows); and student visitors for students on short courses.
Workers registration scheme for workers from eastern Europe
Since 1 May 2004 nationals of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia have had the right to work in the UK. The employer has to carry out a check (as above) to show they are a national of the country. If they are from an A8 state (any of the countries other than Cyprus and Malta), the employer should advise them to register immediately with the Home Office's workers registration scheme. This requirement was expected to end on 30 April 2009, but was extended to 30 April 2011.
The employer must check within one month of the person starting work that they have registered with the scheme, and the worker must remain registered until they have completed 12 months' work. A copy of the employee's registration certificate will be sent to the employer and should be kept. It is an offence for an employer not to comply with these rules, with a fine of up to £5,000.
Stricter rules, based on the old work permit system, apply to workers from Bulgaria and Romania.
Sources of information
Information about all aspects of immigration is available from the UK Border Agency (formerly Immigration and Nationality Directorate, and then Borders and Immigration Agency) at www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/employers and its employers' helpline on 0845 010 6677.
The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/20060013.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
TUPE CASES AND GUIDANCE
Added 16/4/09. This information is included in s.29.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Information Commissioner's Office issued in June 2008 guidance on the data protection implications of a transferring employer's obligation to provide information about employees to the transferee (the receiving employer) in a transfer under the TUPE regulations the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. For information about the obligation to provide this employee liability information, see www.sandy-a.co.uk/vslh/26recruitment.htm#tupe.
The ICO's guidance emphasises that the TUPE obligation to provide details of employees' identity, age, remuneration, and any disciplinary or legal action in the two years before the transfer overrides the data protection requirement not to disclose such information. All disclosed information must be accurate, up to date and secure, and the transferee must use the information only for the purpose of TUPE, for example assessing potential liabilities linked to the transfer. Information which is not required under the TUPE regulations should, if it is required for other purposes, be anonymised if possible.
The ICO's Disclosure of employee information under TUPE can be accessed via tinyurl.com/4en9nr.
On a separate TUPE matter: since 2006 there has been uncertainty about situations where a transferee is bound by a collective agreement negotiated between the transferor and a trade union, and a pay increase is negotiated by the transferor and union after the transfer has taken place. The employment appeal tribunal held in Whent v Cartledge in 1996 that the transferee is bound by the pay increase, even though the transferee was not a party to the negotiations. This changed in 2006 when the European Court of Justice ruled that the acquired rights directive does not apply to contractual changes agreed after the transfer.
But in February 2009 the employment appeal tribunal ruled that the UK can interpret the acquired rights directive in a way that is more favourable to employees. This decision, in Alemo-Herron & others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd, is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0456_08_1201.html. The decision is being appealed, but in the meantime any employer which has taken on employees covered under a collective agreement with their previous employer or is considering taking on such employees should take legal advice about the potential implications.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
MINIMUM WAGE
Updated 22/6/10. This information updates s.30.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government confirmed on 22 June 2010 that from 1 October 2010 the national minimum wage will go up from £5.80 per hour to £5.93 for workers aged 21 and over, from £4.83 to £4.92 for 18-20 year olds, and from £3.57 to £3.64 for 16 and 17 year olds who are above school leaving age and are not apprentices. The accommodation offset rate (the amount that can be taken into account for living accommodation) will go up from £4.51 per day (£31.57 per week) to £4.61 per day (£32.27 per week).
The upper age limit for the youth development rate will be decreased, so that 21-year olds will from October be entitled to the adult rate rather than the youth rate.
There will be an apprentice minimum wage of £2.50 per hour for apprentices aged under 19, or over 19 and in the first year of their apprenticeship. This will apply to apprentices on traditional contracts of apprenticeship, and employed apprentices on government-supported level 2 and 3 schemes. It will replace the minimum rate of pay of £95 per week that came into effect from 1 August 2009 for apprentices.
Information for employees and employers about all aspects of minimum wage, including an interactive website for workers and employers to find out how the minimum wage applies to them, is available from Business Link via tinyurl.com/yzrcx3a. Information is also available from HM Revenue & Customs via www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/payroll/day-to-day/nmw.htm, and from the pay and work rights helpline at 0800 917 2368, covering minimum wage, working time rights and agency workers' rights.
Information about the October 2010 changes is available from the Low Pay Unit at www.lowpayunit.org.uk.
The National Minimum Wage Act 1998, setting out the basic legislation, is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/19980039.htm.
The National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2009 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20091902_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
TIPS, GRATUITIES AND MINIMUM WAGE
Updated 22/11/09. This information is included in s.30.2.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Following the court of appeal decision in Annabels (Berkeley Square) Ltd and others v HM Revenue & Customs, regulation 31(1)(e) of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 which said that tips paid to staff through the employer's payroll count towards minimum wage has been amended. From 1 October 2009, no tips or service charges can count towards minimum wage whether paid to workers through the payroll, through a tronc (a system for pooling tips, paying them into a troncmaster's account, and distributing them to staff), or paid direct to the employee by customers.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
EARNINGS FROM PERMITTED WORK
Added 4/4/10. This information updates s.30.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 October 2009, workers who are receiving incapacity benefit or employment and support allowance (ESA) can earn up to £93 per week for up permitted work, without it affecting their benefit, for up to one year or for more than a year if it is supported permitted work.
The permitted work and supported permitted work rules for ESA claimants are summarised at www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/FinancialSupport/esa/DG_171909, and for incapacity benefit claimants at www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/FinancialSupport/IncapacityBenefit/DG_10020667.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
PAYE FORMS AND FILING
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates s.30.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Almost all employers must file their 2009-10 employer annual return (P35 and P14s) online by 19 May 2010. There is no longer an option for employers with fewer than 50 employees to submit their return and P14s on paper.
There are a very few exceptions to the obligation to file online, most notably for employers who employ someone to provide care or support services at or from their home, but this exception is subject to a number of conditions, including that the person receiving the service must have a physical or mental disability or be aged 65 or over. HMRC guidance for these and other exempt employers is available via tinyurl.com/yh5l5tu.
Information about HM Revenue & Customs' online PAYE service, including how to register, is at www.hrmc.gov.uk/paye. An employer unable to file online can have an intermediary do so on its behalf.
From 19 May 2010 HMRC is introducing new penalties for late or incomplete payment of PAYE, national insurance contributions, student loan deductions and construction industry scheme deductions. Penalties are calculated as a percentage of the late amount, ranging from 1% to 5%, but will not be charged if the employer can show it took reasonable care to get it right for example, by showing that it kept proper records or if it makes an arrangement for late payment with HMRC's business payment support service (0845 302 1435) before the payment is due and sticks to the arrangement.
HMRC information about the new penalties is available via tinyurl.com/y3ktmd7.
All employers with 50 or more employees, and from 6 April 2011 employers with fewer than 50 employees, must file certain PAYE forms online. These are P45(1) when an employee leaves, P45(3) when an employee starts work, and P46 when an employee starts work and does not have a P45. When an employee of any age starts to receive a pension, a new form P46(Pen) or a P45(3) has to be submitted. P46(Pen) replaces the current pension notification forms P160 and PENNOT.
If forms are filed on paper, the old A5-sized P45 is no longer valid. Only the new A4 form, which includes the employee's date of birth and gender, may be used.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
TAX ALLOWANCES AND NATIONAL INSURANCE THRESHOLDS
Updated 17/3/10. This information updates ss.30.4.1 and 30.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010 the basic personal allowance for under-65s remains £6,475 (£124.50 per week). Basic rate tax remains 20% for taxable income from £0 to £37,400 and higher rate remains 40% for taxable income from £37,401 to £150,000, but there is a new additional rate of 50% for taxable income above £150,000.
Another significant change is that from 6 April 2010, the personal allowance is withdrawn at the rate of £1 for each £2 of taxable income over £100,000, until it is completely removed.
Information about the additional rate of income tax and the income-related reduction of the personal allowance is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2009/bn01.pdf.
From 6 April 2010 the national insurance lower earnings limit (the lowest level of earnings that can count towards entitlement to statutory sick pay and statutory maternity, paternity and adoption pay) is increased from £95 to £97 per week.
The starting point for national insurance contributions (the primary threshold) remains £110 per week, and the upper earnings limit for employee's NICs remains £844 per week. Employee's NICs remain 11% between the primary threshold and upper earnings limit and an additional 1% on earnings above the upper earnings limit. Employer's NICs remain 12.8%.
Employee's and employer's NICs were both supposed to go up by 1% from 6 April 2011, but the coalition government has said the increase in employer's NICs will not happen.
The tax and national insurance rates and thresholds for 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-2011 are at www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
STATE PENSIONS
Updated 17/3/10. This information updates s.30.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Information about state pensions is available from the Pension Service, part of the Department for Work and Pensions, at www.direct.gov.uk for employees and www.businesslink.gov.uk for employers.
From 6 April 2010 until 2020, the state pension age for women is being increased from 60 to 65 to bring it in line with the pension age for men. The state pension age was then going to rise from 65 to 66 between 2024 and 2026, to 67 between 2034 and 2036, and to 68 between 2044 and 2046, but the coalition government has said that for men, the increase will start in 2016.
Also from 6 April 2010:
-
the number of years' contributions needed for a full basic state pension is reduced to 30 (for people reaching pension age before 6 April 2010 it was 39 for women and 44 for men);
-
weekly credits are introduced for carers, enabling them to build up entitlement to a state pension;
-
the rules which entitle married women in some circumstances to increase their state pension based on their spouse's contributions, are extended to married men and civil partners.
Since 6 April 2009, people who reach(ed) state pension age between 6 April 2008 and 5 April 2015 and who already have at least 20 qualifying years on their national insurance record, are able to pay class 3 national insurance contributions for an additional six qualifying years (in addition to the six years which can already be paid for). This provision is intended primarily for women and carers who have had substantial periods when they were not working and did not make (or were not credited with) NI payments. Information about class 3 NI contributions is available via tinyurl.com/ybjfc94.
Under the Pensions Act 2007 the basic state pension is supposed to become linked to earnings (as it used to be) rather than inflation (as it now is), and from around 2030 the state second pension, which tops up the basic state pension, will become flat-rate.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH2 chapter 27)
NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS TRUST
Updated 17/3/10. This information significantly changes s.30.6.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Unless it is changed by the coalition government, he Pensions Act 2008 will require every "jobholder" aged between 22 and state pension age who earns between £5,035 and £33,540 (in 2006/07 earnings terms) and is not in an employer's qualifying pension scheme to be automatically enrolled (auto-enrolled) in the national employment savings trust (NEST) unless they opt out. A jobholder is anyone working under in Great Britain under a contract, including a temporary contract.
Jobholders with earnings less than the qualifying amount or aged 16-21 or above state pension age will be able to opt in to the scheme.
NEST will be a defined contribution occupational pension scheme. It was formerly going to be called the national pensions savings scheme and each member would have a personal account, but these terms have been dropped. NEST will replace the current Personal Accounts Delivery Authority, which will be wound up in July 2010.
An employers' duty to auto-enrol workers in NEST or another qualifying scheme will be introduced on 1 October 2012 for employers with more than 120,000 workers, then in monthly intervals (called staging dates) until 1 July 2014 for employers with 119,999 down to 50 workers. For employers with fewer than 50 workers, the staging date depends on the last two numbers in the employer's PAYE reference number and may be as late as 1 February 2016. For new businesses with fewer than 50 workers created from April 2012, staging dates will be from 1 March 2016 to 1 September 2016. All staging dates are listed in the Employers' Duties (Implementation) Regulations 2010 at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/plain/uksi_20100004_en.
From 1 October 2012, employers who want to join the scheme earlier than their staging date will be able to do so provided certain conditions are met.
The rules for auto-enrolment, opting out by workers and qualifying pension schemes are in the Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) Regulations 2010, at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100772_en_1.
Statutory minimum contributions to NEST or a qualifying scheme will be phased in, with the employer (for workers above the £5,035 threshold) and worker each paying at least 1% of the worker's salary in phase 1 (from the staging date or earlier if the employer starts auto-enrolling earlier) until October 2016; the employer paying 2% and the worker 3% in phase 2 (starting in October 2016); and the employer paying 3% and the worker 5% in phase 3 (unspecified date in 2017). In addition, 1% tax relief will also be paid into the scheme for the worker. It is expected that there will be an annual contribution limit of £3,600 (in 2005 terms).
It is also expected that workers will be able to select options such as social, environmental and ethical investments if they wish.
Clear information about NEST including which employees will and will not have to be auto-enrolled is available from the Pensions Advisory Service via tinyurl.com/ycq66f5. Information is also available from the Pensions Regulator at www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/pensions-reform.aspx.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH2 chapter 27)
OCCUPATIONAL PENSIONS
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates s.30.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010, the minimum age at which a person can receive an occupational or personal pension goes up from 50 to 55, although this increase does not apply to early retirement due to ill health, or to pension scheme members who have a protected pension age. Organisations which run their own pension schemes should ensure the scheme rules are amended, if necessary, to reflect this change, and should ensure they do not make unauthorised payments to scheme members aged under 55.
TLT solicitors has a useful short briefing for pension scheme trustees and employers, via tinyurl.com/ya3xac3.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH2 chapter 27)
PENSION LIABILITY ON INCORPORATION, MERGER OR WINDING UP
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates s.30.6.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010 the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010 make it easier for two organisations which are associated with each other and are members of the same multi-employer defined benefit or final salary pension scheme to restructure, without triggering a cessation event. Strict procedural rules, set out in the regulations, must be followed.
As defined under the Pensions Act 1995 s.75 and the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt on Withdrawal) Regulations 2005, a cessation event includes, for example, an incorporation where the assets and liabilities of an unincorporated organisation are transferred to the new incorporated body, a merger where all or part of organisation's undertakings are transferred to an existing or new organisation such that the original organisation no longer has any members in the pension scheme, winding up an organisation, withdrawing from the pension scheme, or reaching a point where the organisation has no more active members in the scheme and no eligible employees to whom membership can be offered. It will presumably also occur if a charitable company converts to a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) when this structure becomes available, unless legislation exempts this situation.
Under the 2005 regulations, when a cessation event occurs the organisation's withdrawal debt crystallises, which means the organisation could potentially become immediately liable for the full cost of pensions for its employees who are entitled to draw pensions now or in future, if these have not yet been fully covered by contributions to the pension scheme. And because of legal changes in the way the debt must be calculated, the debt is likely to be significant. But it is important to emphasise that the debt does not become payable unless there is a cessation event.
The Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008, which came into effect on 6 April 2008, eased some of the requirements when an organisation which is a member of a multi-employer defined benefit or final salary pension scheme has a cessation event. Under these regulations:
-
Where the cessation event is that there are no more members in the scheme, there is a 12-month grace period during which time the employer will presumably try to get at least one employee to join.
-
For other cessation events the pension provider and employer can agree a withdrawal arrangement under which the employer pays a specified amount based on how much has already been paid into the scheme. The employer puts in place a guarantor, agreed by the pension provider, who will if required pay the remainder of the potential debt.
-
In an arrangement specifically intended for "ongoing organisations with low levels of liquidity such as charities", the Pensions Regulator can agree with the pension provider an approved withdrawal arrangement, under which the employer can pay a lower amount. Where the cessation event is a winding up to incorporate or merge, the guarantor will presumably be the new incorporated or merged organisation.
The 2010 regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100725_en_1.
The 2008 regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20080731_en_1.
The Charity Commission has some guidance in its Defined benefit pension schemes and recent changes to pension legislation briefing (July 2009) at tinyurl.com/ygysm8r.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH2 chapter 27)
ON-CALL TIME AS WORKING TIME
Updated 2/4/10. This information is included in s.31.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
After years of uncertainty about what constitutes on-call time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the European Court of Justice eventually confirmed in 2003 that on-call time includes time when a worker is required to be at or near a place of work specified by the employer, even if they are sleeping or doing something other than working. If they are not required to be at a place of work, working time includes only the time they are actually working.
In 2008 discussions took place within the EU about whether the EU working time directive, on which the working time regulations are based, should be amended so that on-call time would be divided into active (when carrying out work for the employer) and inactive, with inactive on-call time not counting as working hours. This proposal was not agreed.
For the purposes of minimum wage the rules are different, and time when on call but sleeping is not working time for minimum wage, unless their contract says they will be paid for the whole time while on call.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
INCREASE IN STATUTORY ANNUAL LEAVE
Updated 14/6/09. This information is included in s.31.4.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Statutory annual leave increased from 4.8 weeks to 5.6 weeks (from 24 days to 28 days for a person working a five-day week) on 1 April 2009. Some employers include the eight bank holidays as part of the statutory entitlement. The change in effect ensures that from April 2009 all full-time workers working a five-day week get their entitlement of 20 days under the EU working time directive, plus time off equivalent to the bank holidays. For part-time workers, the entitlement is pro rata.
To ensure employees get the correct entitlement, it is essential to look closely at contracts of employment, and at the holiday entitlement that employees were given prior to April 2009 if it is different from what is in their written contract. The exact wording may make a difference to their new entitlement.
Business Link has detailed information about statutory annual leave, including how to calculate entitlement for part-time, casual and other atypical workers. The Business Link guidance can be accessed via tinyurl.com/9v7p7y.
The Working Time (Amendment) Regulations 2007 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/20072079.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
EMPLOYEE'S FAILURE TO GIVE NOTICE
FOR ANNUAL LEAVE
Added 15/2/10. This information updates in s.31.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Although there is a statutory entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to 5.6 weeks annual leave, the employee must give notice to the employer as required under the contract of employment, a workplace agreement, or the default statutory provisions. The regulations also say that statutory annual leave must be taken within the leave year and cannot be carried over, and that except on termination of employment, there is no entitlement to pay for statutory leave not taken.
The employment appeal tribunal confirmed on 18 January 2010 that if an employee fails to give notice as required, and there is then not enough time to give correct notice and take the leave before the end of the year, the employee cannot carry the leave over and use it in the next year. Although some commentators describe this decision as "use it or lose it", it can more accurately be described as "give proper notice or lose it".
The decision in Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2010/0081_09_1801.html.
Note that this rule is likely not to apply where the employee is prevented from giving proper notice because of sickness see Holiday pay and long-term sickness and Sickness during annual leave below.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
HOLIDAY PAY AND LONG-TERM SICKNESS
Updated 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.4.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The European Court of Justice ruled in Stringer v HM Revenue & Customs on 20 January 2009 that annual leave entitlement under the working time directive accrues during sick leave, and even if a worker is absent for a full leave year, they are entitled to four weeks' paid annual leave during that year. The ECJ decision is limited to the four weeks' leave entitlement under the EU working time directive, and does not cover the additional 1.6 weeks statutory entitlement in the UK (see statutory annual leave above) or contractual holiday pay.
The ECJ also ruled that a worker who ceases to be employed while on sick leave and has not taken their four weeks' annual leave entitlement is entitled to an allowance (pro rata) in lieu of leave not taken.
After the ECJ decision, the Stringer case was referred back to the House of Lords to decide how the decision applied in the UK. The House of Lords ruled on 10 June 2009 that where a worker has not been paid for annual leave entitlement under the working time regulations, the worker can claim either under the working time regulations or as an unauthorised deduction from wages (which could allow the claim to go back longer than a claim under the working time regulations).
The ECJ decision left it up to national courts to decide whether annual leave can be taken during the year of absence (so in effect four weeks during the absence become annual leave rather than sick leave), or the annual leave can be carried over to the next leave year, but these issues were not covered in the House of Lords' decision. They have, however, started to be clarified to some extent by the ECJ decision in Pereda v Madrid Movilidad.
But the situation with regard to employees who are on long-term sick leave, or who were on long-term sick leave and were not paid for annual leave, remains complex and confusing, and legal advice should be sought.
The House of Lords decision in HM Revenue & Customs v Stringer and others is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/31.html.
Contractual holiday continues to accrue during sick leave, no matter how long the person is off ill, unless the contract says it does not. Employers may want to consider revising future contracts to say that contractual holiday does not accrue during sickness absence of more than a certain period.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
Go to archived items about disability discrimination (VSLH2 chapter 25)
Go to archived items about dismissal (VSLH2 chapter 30)
STATUTORY SICK PAY
Updated 2/4/10. This information is included in s.31.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For employees earning £97 per week or more (increased from £95), the statutory sick pay rate for sickness absence on or after 6 April 2010 remains £79.15 per week.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
FIT NOTES
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates in s.31.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010, sick notes saying an employee is not fit for work have been replaced with computer-generated fit notes saying the person is either not fit for work, or "may be fit for work taking account of the following advice". A third option, certifying that the employee is fit for work, was not included, because of widespread concern that GPs would not know enough about particular jobs to know whether the employee is fit to do them.
The purpose of the fit note is to facilitate a return to work, by listing options such as a phased return to work, changes in duties and/or hours, or workplace adaptations, and by encouraging discussion between the GP and employee and between the employee and employer. Proposals for a longer list of options, including an option that the employer refer to employee to an occupational health consultant, have not been included in the final regulations.
Employers need to carefully consider recommendations made by the GP, especially where the employee is or could be legally disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and could therefore bring a claim against the employer for failure to make reasonable adjustments.
But ultimately it is the employer in consultation with the employee who makes the decision about whether to follow the GP's advice. If a change or adaptation to enable the employee to return to work is not possible, the employee remains not fit for work until the end of the fit note period, or until a suitable change or adaptation is possible.
If a change or adaptation is agreed, it should be for a clear period and should be kept under review (not "until you feel able to do more" but "for three weeks [or whatever] and then we will review it".
During the first six months of a health condition, the maximum period for a fit note is three months. After the first six months, the fit note can be for "any clinically appropriate period".
The Department for Work and Pensions' guidance, Statement of fitness for work: A guide for employers, with a summary of the rules, case studies and frequently asked questions, is at www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/fitnote-employer-guide.pdf.
Guidance for employees is at www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/fit-note-employee-guide.pdf.
The Social Security(Medical Evidence) and Statutory Sick Pay (Medical Evidence) Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100137_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
MANAGING LONG-TERM SICKNESS ABSENCE
Added 15/2/10. This information updates in s.31.6.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidance in mid-2009 for employers and managers who manage long-term, or recurring short- or long-term, sickness absence and incapacity. It is also relevant for trade union and employee representatives, employees, and people receiving incapacity benefit or employment and support allowance.
The recommendations for employers are:
-
identify someone who is suitably trained and impartial to undertake initial enquiries with an employee who is experiencing long-term sickness absence or recurring short- or long-term sickness absence, in particular those with musculoskeletal disorders or mental health problems;
-
if necessary, arrange for a more detailed assessment by relevant specialist(s), which could be coordinated by a suitably trained case worker;
-
coordinate and support any health, occupational or rehabilitation interventions or services and any return-to-work plan agreed with the employee;
-
ensure employees are consulted and jointly agree all planned health, occupational or rehabilitation interventions or services and the return to work plan, including workplace or work equipment modifications.
The guidance can be accessed at www.nice.org.uk/ph19.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
SICKNESS DURING ANNUAL LEAVE
Added 15/2/10. This information creates a new section, Sickness while on leave, after s.31.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The long-running Stringer case was about a worker's entitlement to statutory annual leave during sick leave lasting for an entire leave year. In the case of Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA the European Court of Justice gave its decision in September 2009 on a different scenario, where annual leave periods are assigned by the employer but the worker is ill during all or part of the assigned period. In this situation, the ECJ ruled, a worker is entitled to ask the employer to reschedule the part of the statutory annual leave during which they were ill, and if requested the employer is obliged to do this even if this means that some of the leave has to be taken in the next leave year.
The decision confirms the distinction between sick leave the purpose of which is to enable to worker to recover from being ill and annual leave, which is intended to ensure the worker has time for rest, relaxation and leisure. However, it leaves unclear a number of issues, including:
-
whether the right to request reclassification of the leave applies only to the four weeks (20 days) statutory annual leave under the European working time directive, or the entire 5.6 weeks (28 days) entitlement in the UK under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR);
-
how it fits with the fact that under the WTR there is no statutory right for a worker to object to an employer's notice that annual leave must be taken on a specific date or dates;
-
the fact that the WTR do not allow statutory annual leave to be carried forward to the next leave year;
-
whether there is any difference (probably not) where the employee has requested the annual leave period rather than being obliged by the employer to take it at a specified time.
The Pereda decision applies immediately to public sector workers. Until the WTR is amended by Parliament the decision may not apply to private (including voluntary) sector workers. But to avoid the risk of it being held to apply, it is sensible for all employers to assume that employees who are ill for all or part of their full statutory leave (5.6 weeks) are entitled to ask to take that part of the leave as sick leave, and to take it as annual leave at a later date regardless of whether the annual leave dates were set by the employer or requested by the employee, and regardless of whether the rescheduled leave ends up being taken in the next leave year.
Clearly there is a risk of abuse by employees self-certifying that they were ill during annual leave. To reduce this risk, it may be appropriate for the employer to make clear that the usual rules on statutory and/or contractual sick leave and pay, including notifying the employer and providing a fit note (or a comparable note from a doctor where the person is on holiday), apply to any period while the person is ill while on annual leave and may want to take that time as sick leave rather than annual leave. The employer may also want to say that the right to have annual leave reclassified as sick leave applies only to statutory annual leave, and not to any additional period of contractual annual leave.
The ECJ decision in Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA is at www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2009/C27708.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
TIME OFF FOR PUBLIC DUTIES
Updated 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Employees have a statutory right to time off, which may be either paid or unpaid, for specified public duties. The Department for Communities and Local Government consulted in 2008 on whether the right to time off should be extended to include members of probation boards, court boards and youth offender panels; board members of probation trusts; lay advisors for multi-agency public protection arrangements; co-opted overview and scrutiny committee members; board members of registered social landlords; and board members of tenant management and arm’s length management organisations. The consultation was also about ways to encourage participation in voluntary sector boards, but DCLG did not propose a statutory right to time off for this.
The government announced in October 2009 that it would take a non-regulatory approach. This will include an information pack outlining the range of roles available, and what the government sees as the benefits to employers of allowing employees time off to undertake these roles.
Standing for office: Time off entitlements - Government response is available via tinyurl.com/yeq943c.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
TIME OFF FOR TRADE UNION DUTIES
Added 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.8.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
An updated ACAS code of practice on time off for trade union duties and activities came into effect on 1 January 2010. Failure to comply with the code is not in itself an offence, but will be taken into account if a relevant claim is brought against the employer. Updated content includes the use of electronic communications, and the responsibility of line managers and union representatives to ensure time off arrangements are effective.
The code can be accessed at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2391, along with ACAS guidance on the roles, responsibilities and rights of trade union representatives and where there is no recognised union employee representatives.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
RIGHT TO REQUEST
TIME OFF FOR TRAINING
Updated 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.8.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010, employees in organisations with 250 or more employees have a statutory right to request time off for training that would benefit them and the employer. The right will be extended to all employees from 6 April 2011.
This new right, called time to train (not to be confused with a different scheme called train to gain), will be similar to the right to request flexible working. The time off does not have to be paid if the training is "off the job" (as opposed to on the job training), and employers are not obliged to contribute to the cost of the training. The right applies only to employees with more than 26 weeks’ continuous service with the employer at the time of making the request.
Guidance for employers was issued on 13 January 2010 and is at www.businesslink.gov.uk/timetotrain.
Guidance for employees is at www.direct.gov.uk/timetotrain.
The time to train legislation is ss.63D-63K of the Employment Rights Act 1996, inserted by s.40 of the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 (www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/ukpga_20090022_en_1).
The detailed rules are in the Employee Study and Training (Procedural Requirements) Regulations 2010 (www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100155_en_1)
and the Employee Study and Training (Eligibility, Complaints and Remedies) Regulations 2010
(www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100156_en_1).
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
WORKERS MEMORIAL DAY
Added 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.4.2.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government announced in January 2009 that the UK will officially recognise 28 April which is also the international day of action for safety and health at work as workers memorial day, to commemorate workers who have been killed, seriously injured or made ill through work. The first formally recognised day is 28 April 2010.
Despite a campaign to make workers memorial day a bank holiday, this has not happened. There is no right to time off for the day, but the government will encourage local commemorations to be organised by individuals, employers, trade unions, community organisations and local authorities.
Information is available from the Trades Union Congress at www.tuc.org.uk/h_and_s/index.cfm?mins=293.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
ANTI-SLAVERY DAY
Added 21/4/10. This information updates s.31.4.2.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Anti-Slavery Day Act 2010, which received royal assent on 8 April 2010, provides for a date to be set to be observed each year as anti-slavery day. Like workers memorial day [see above] on 28 April and holocaust memorial day on 27 January it will not be a bank holiday, but will provide a focus to raise awareness of the millions of people who are victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation, child trafficking, trafficking for forced labour, and domestic servitude; and to draw attention to progress made to combat slavery, human trafficking and exploitation and what still needs to be done.
The Act is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/ukpga_20100014_en_1.
There appears to be no indication of what the date might be, but an obvious one would be 2 December, which is the the international day for the abolition of slavery. The United Nations Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others was adopted by the UN general assembly on 2 December 1949.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH2 chapter 28)
STATUTORY MATERNITY, PATERNITY AND ADOPTION LEAVE AND PAY
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates ss.32.2 to 32.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Statutory maternity pay (SMP) is 90% of the woman's weekly earnings for the first six weeks of maternity leave. For the remaining 33 weeks of the 39-week SMP period, SMP is a flat weekly rate or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is less. For payment weeks starting on or after 6 April 2010, the flat rate goes up from £123.06 to £124.88.
Statutory paternity pay and statutory adoption pay are £124.88 per week (increased from £123.06) for weeks starting on or after 6 April 2010) or 90% of the employee's average weekly earnings, whichever is less.
An employer who paid, or was liable to pay, gross class 1 national insurance contributions of £45,000 or less in the individual employee's qualifying tax year can recover 100% of the SMP, SPP or SAP, plus 4.5% compensation. Employers who do not qualify for this small employer relief can recover 92%.
The government intended to increase SMP and SAP from 39 to 52 weeks, but this has been put on hold indefinitely.
CIPD's very clear factsheet on maternity, paternity and adoption rights is at www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/emplaw/maternity/matpat.htm.
Other information is available at www.acas.org.uk, www.tuc.org.uk, and for employers at www.businesslink.gov.uk and employees at www.direct.gov.uk.
Additional paternity pay and leave
The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 give a new right to additional paternity leave (birth) in relation to babies expected on or after 3 April 2011. To be eligible the person must be the child's father or the husband/civil partner of the mother, must have or expect to have the main responsibility (apart from any responsibility of the mother) for bringing up the child, and must have been entitled to ordinary paternity leave from the employer (see below). The term 'fathers' as used below therefore refers to anyone eligible for the new leave and pay, regardless of their gender or whether they are actually the father.
Where a couple who are married or civil partners are adopting and one of them is entitled to statutory adoption leave, the other will be entitled to additional paternity leave (adoption) if they were entitled to ordinary paternity leave.
-
Fathers/the second adopter in a couple will remain entitled to ordinary paternity leave and statutory paternity pay (see above) for two weeks at or around the time of the birth or adoption, provided they have 26 weeks' continuous employment with the employer by the end of the 15th week before the expected week of childbirth or by the end of the week before being matched with a child for adoption, are still employed at the time of the leave, and have average earnings of at least the national insurance lower earning limit (£97 per week in 2010-11).
-
All mothers will remain entitled to 52 weeks statutory maternity leave (SML). One person (either male or female) in an adopting couple will remain entitled to 52 weeks statutory adoption leave (SAL) provided they have 26 weeks' continuous employment by the end of the week before being matched for adoption. But if the mother or adopter returns to work without taking their full 52 weeks leave, a father/adopter who was entitled to ordinary paternity leave will become entitled to the mother's/adopter's remaining leave as additional paternity leave (birth) or additional paternity leave (adoption).
-
The maximum entitlement to additional paternity leave is six months. It cannot be taken until at least 20 weeks after the birth or placement for adoption, and cannot last beyond 12 months from the date of birth or placement.
-
A mother on statutory maternity leave or adoptive parent on statutory adoption leave is entitled to 39 weeks statutory maternity pay (SMP) or statutory adoption pay (SAP) is s/he has the necessary 26 weeks of continuous employment and average earnings above the national insurance lower earnings limit. But if the mother or adopter returns to work without using their full entitlement to SMP or SAP, the father/other adopter is entitled to the remainder as additional statutory paternity pay, paid at the same rate as SMP/SAP.
-
As with the current adoption entitlements, there are special rules for adoptions from overseas.
-
A father can be entitled to additional paternity leave and pay before 3 April 2011 if a baby due on or after that date is born before then.
-
Parents will be required to "self-certify" entitlement to additional paternity leave and pay by providing details of their eligibility to their employer. Employers and HM Revenue & Customs will, if they consider it necessary, be able to carry out further checks on entitlement.
-
The right of all parents with at least one year's employment to 13 weeks' unpaid parental leave before the child's fifth birthday (or 18th if the child is disabled) remains unchanged. So also does the right of parents with at least 26 weeks' continuous employment and a child under 17 (or under 18 if the child is disabled) to request flexible working.
In due course full guidance will be available for employers at www.businesslink.gov.uk and for employees at www.direct.gov.uk, and for both employers and employees at www.acas.org.uk.
The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20101055_en_1.
The Additional Statutory Paternity Pay (General) Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20101056_en_1.
Further changes may be needed in future if the European parliament adopts a revised version of the pregnant workers directive, increasing maternity leave on full pay from 14 to 20 weeks.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about maternity, paternity and adoption pay (VSLH2 chapter 27)
Go to archived items about maternity, paternity and adoption leave (VSLH2 chapter 28)
CODE OF PRACTICE ON DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
Updated 15/6/09. This information is included in s.33.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For disciplinary and grievance procedures triggered on or after 6 April 2009, the previous statutory procedures are replaced by an ACAS code of practice on discipline and grievance, setting out the basic principles of good practice. It does not have force of law and failure to comply with it is not in itself unlawful. However an employer's unreasonable failure to comply with the code can be taken into account by the employment tribunal and can lead to an increase of up to 25% in any award made by the tribunal, and an employee’s failure to comply can lead to a reduction of up to 25% in any award.
In practice the three stages of the statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures still remain under the new code (written notice, meeting, right of appeal) but without the detailed rigid requirements that could lead to an employer or employee being penalised for a technical breach of the procedures.
The intention of the new procedures is that disciplinary and grievance issues should, if possible, be dealt with through informal discussion. If this is unsuccessful, the key elements in a fair and transparent procedure are defined as dealing with issues promptly, acting consistently, carrying out an investigation to establish the facts, informing the employee of the issue, ensuring the employee can put their case at a disciplinary or grievance meeting before any decisions are made, ensuring the employee has the right to be accompanied, and ensuring the employee’s right to appeal against any formal decision.
Dismissals for a disciplinary reasons should follow the code, but failure to follow it does not make the dismissal automatically unfair as it was under the statutory procedures. The code does not apply to redundancy dismissals, termination of fixed-term contracts, or retirement dismissals.
The code's section on keys to handling disciplinary issues provides guidance on investigations and who should conduct them, the sort of information employees should be provided with before any disciplinary meetings, the role of a companion, gross misconduct, dismissals, and appeals. All parties have an obligation to make every effort to attend disciplinary meetings. In some situations expired disciplinary warnings can be taken into effect (see expired warnings). One change from the statutory procedures is that the employer must inform employees of their right to be accompanied by a companion.
Another significant change from the statutory procedures is that disciplinary warnings have to be dealt with procedurally in the same way as dismissals, which means there must be provision for appeal against a warning.
The keys to handling grievances state that employees should raise grievances formally in writing, without undue delay, with their line manager if they have a concern that cannot be resolved informally. It is made clear that a grievance meeting can be adjourned if an investigation is necessary. The employer's decision has to be in writing, and employees have to appeal if they are not satisfied with the decision, rather than going direct to the tribunal.
Unlike under the statutory procedures it is no longer necessary for an employee to go through a grievance procedure before bringing a claim in the employment tribunal, but failure to do so could be held to be unreasonable and could lead to a decrease of up to 25% in any award to the employee.
The code includes sections on overlapping grievance and disciplinary cases and on collective grievances.
The final version of the code was approved by Parliament on 12 March 2009 and is at www.acas.org.uk/dgcode2009.
The final version of ACAS's guidance, which is more detailed than the code, is at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2179.
Further information, including details of extended opening hours from April for the ACAS helpline and the increased emphasis on mediation as a way to solve workplace disputes, is at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2126.
The Employment Act 2008, which brings in the new provisions, is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080024_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about disciplinary & grievance (VSLH2 chapter 29)
Go to archived items about termination of employment (VSLH2 chapter 30)
TRIBUNALS CAN PASS WHISTLEBLOWING DISCLOSURES TO REGULATORS
Added 2/4/10. This information updates s.33.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A worker who is dismissed or victimised, or a former worker who is victimised, for making a "protected disclosure" (whistleblowing) under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 can bring a claim against the employer.
In whistleblowing cases the tribunal looks only at whether the worker complied with the rules under the Act about what can be disclosed and who it can be disclosed to, and whether the worker was victimised or dismissed because of the disclosure. The tribunal does not look at the substance of the disclosure itself.
From 6 April 2010, the ET1 claim form has a tick box for the worker to indicate whether s/he wants the tribunal to pass details of the protected disclosure to the relevant regulator(s) so the substance of it can, if appropriate, be investigated. Regulators could include, for example, the Charity Commission, Health and Safety Executive or Environment Agency. Various confidentiality options will be available.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about whistleblowing (VSLH2 chapter 29)
STATUTORY REDUNDANCY PAY
Updated 22/11/09. This information is included in s.35.7.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For redundancies taking effect on or after 1 October 2009, the maximum weekly pay for calculating statutory redundancy pay is increased from £350 to £380.
For a range of briefings on redundancy (and alternatives to it) see the recession resources section of this website at www.sandy-a.co.uk/managing.htm#recession.
Go back to contents
CRIMINAL RECORD CHECKS
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Criminal Records Bureau issued on 6 April 2009 a revised code of practice for registered bodies and other recipients of CRB disclosure information. The revised code is intended to ensure organisations do not breach the spirit and requirements of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975 by submitting ineligible disclosure applications. It also seeks to ensure registered and umbrella bodies correctly verify the identity of disclosure applicants; sensitive and personal data in disclosures is correctly managed and used by registered and umbrella bodies and others; and registered bodies and others treat their applicants fairly when considering sensitive disclosure information. Registered bodies which fail to comply with the code may be suspended or deregistered. The code is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/Code%20of%20practice%20Apr%2009.pdf.
The CRB website includes detailed guidance on the code's obligations. Guidance on other aspects of CRB checks is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/guidance.aspx.
The fee for CRB checks is £26 for standard disclosures and £36 for enhanced. The fee is waived for checks on volunteers, defined in the Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) Regulations 2002 as "a person engaged in an activity which involves spending time, unpaid (except for travel and other approved out-of-pocket expenses), doing something which aims to benefit some third party other than or in addition to a close relative".
A standard disclosure (also referred to as a criminal record certificate) lists convictions which are "spent" under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, unspent convictions and cautions. For work with children (defined in most cases as under 18) or vulnerable adults the disclosure is enhanced (called an enhanced criminal record certificate), listing in addition police information such as suspicions that did not lead to a caution or conviction, and information about whether the person is barred from working with (as appropriate) children or vulnerable adults.
Standard and enhanced checks are available only in relation to professions or positions specified in various exception orders made under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 mostly positions involving access to children or vulnerable adults, work in health or education, and certain professions such as accountancy. The CRB can provide information about positions for which disclosures can be obtained.
In exceptional cases a care worker may be allowed to start work in a care home, for a domiciliary care agency, or as an adult placement carer before a CRB check has been issued, provided an AdultFirst check has been done by the CRB (fee £6).
Because of widespread concern about CRB checks being carried out where there is no statutory entitlement to do so in particular in relation to volunteers, where the checks are free the Office of the Third Sector issued guidance in 2008 on CRB checks for organisations that use volunteers. Although the guidance is no longer available, it warned that organisations which carry out free checks when they are not entitled to do so could be required to pay the fee for the checks. For guidance on trustee checks (currently being revised), see the Charity Commission's CC30 Finding new trustees: What charities need to know at www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc30.asp.
CIPD (the Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development) updated in March and April 2009 its guidance on employing people with criminal records, risk assessment in relation to employing people with criminal records, and recruitment of people working with children and vulnerable adults. These are at www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/dvsequl/exoffenders/crimrec.htm,
www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/dvsequl/exoffenders/crimrecra.htm and
www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/recruitmen/general/recruitypw.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
VETTING AND BARRING SCHEME
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Home Office issued in March 2010 guidance on the vetting and barring scheme (VBS), which is essential reading for any organisation which works with children or with adults defined under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 as vulnerable. It is at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/VBS_guidance_ed1_2010.pdf.
Although the government announced on 15 June 2010 that some aspects of VBS registration in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland were being reviewed and "remodelled", much of the guidance still applies. A summary of the guidance, containing only those provisions that apply to safeguarding during the VBS review period, is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/pdf/VBS%20Interim%20guidance.pdf.
The Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) newsletter of 15 June 2010, available by registering for newsletters on the ISA's website at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk, explains how to apply for CRB checks during the review period. Up to date information about CRB checks is available from the CRB at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk. The VBS contact centre is at 0300 123 1111 and the CRB customer services centre at 0870 9090 811.
The ISA recommends that employers get their information about the VBS and CRB checks via Business Link at tinyurl.com/34x3oyh, but I am quite sure that one aspect of this is incorrect [see second bullet point below] and am therefore not currently recommending it.
Until any recommendations arising from the review are implemented, provisions of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 which have already been implemented, and existing rules under the Protection of Children Act, Care Standards Act and related legislation that have not yet been repealed, continue to apply, as summarised below.
The dates and details below refer to England. Organisations outside England should take advice locally, because although most provisions are the same for Wales there are a few differences, Northern Ireland has separate legislation although it closely follows England and Wales, and Scotland is developing a parallel scheme.
Suspended for the time being
While the government's review is in progress, the following provisions, which were due to come into effect on 26 July 2010 and in November 2010, have been put on hold.
-
Voluntary registration with the ISA. Provision for voluntary ISA registration for individuals starting work or changing roles, whether paid or unpaid, in regulated activities with children or vulnerable adults has been suspended. Voluntary registration was due to start on 26 July 2010.
-
Compulsory registration with the ISA. Compulsory registration of anyone starting work or changing roles, paid or unpaid, in a regulated activity was due to start in November 2010. The statement issued by the Home Office on 15 June and information on the ISA website seem very clear that all registration, including compulsory registration from November, has been suspended. But as of 20 June the Business Link website said, at tinyurl.com/35eon69, that compulsory registration will start in November. I am 99.9% sure this is an error and have contacted Business Link. If you check their website and find it has been changed or if you learn from the ISA that the Business Link statement is indeed correct please let me know. (The fact that Business Link, a supposedly reliable source of information, almost certainly has this wrong is an indication of just how confusing the information relating to this whole process is.)
-
Assuming that compulsory registration from November of new workers and those changing roles is suspended, so too will be compulsory registration, phased in over five years, of anyone who is already in regulated or controlled activities when compulsory registration starts.
-
ISA registration process. The arrangement for ISA registration through the Criminal Records Bureau, with a combined CRB/ISA application form, has been suspended. However, the combined forms have already started to be issued, and from 20 July 2010 all applications received by the CRB must be on the new form. The new form can be used before then, from 28 June 2010, but applications submitted on the new form will not be processed until 26 July. The sections of the form that relate specifically to ISA registration should not be filled in. Information about how to fill in the forms is available from the CRB or in the ISA newsletter of 15 June [see above].
-
Employers' access to ISA information. Provision for all employers, including domestic employers (of nannies, private tutors and teachers, care workers etc) to make free, instant online ISA checks from 26 July to see if a person is registered or is barred from work with vulnerable groups, has been suspended. Information about whether a person is barred will continue to be provided to employers and volunteer-using organisations only through CRB enhanced checks.
-
Provision for employers to register with the ISA, express an interest in a person's ISA registration status, and be informed by the ISA if the person is subsequently barred, has been suspended.
-
New criminal offence. Until compulsory registration starts, the provision will not come into effect making it an offence, with a fine of up to £5,000, for an employer to employ a person, whether paid or unpaid, to work with children or vulnerable adults in a regulated who is not registered with the ISA, or to fail to check the ISA system. However, it is already an offence subject to the same fine knowingly to allow a barred person to engage in a regulated activity, or for such a person to seek or take on work with the group from which they are barred. It is also unlawful for an employer or organisation to allow a barred person to engage in a controlled activity, unless there is suitable provision for supervision.
Consultations
Two aspects of the vetting and barring scheme which have not yet been implemented were being consulted on even before the new review.
-
Controlled activity. Whether the category of controlled activities, where people have less access to children or vulnerable adults than in regulated activities, should be reduced or removed by moving some posts into regulated activity and removing others from regulation. Details of this consultation, which ended on 9 July 2010, are at tinyurl.com/ykjklnj.
-
Portability. Whether the statutory requirement for some workers to have CRB checks when they move to another regulated activity should be revised, so the employer only has to check their ISA status . This consultation also ended on 9 July 2010, with details at tinyurl.com/ydrxczw.
Still in force
Provisions that were implemented on 12 October 2009, or in some cases earlier, remain in force. These include:
-
CRB checks. All CRB checks for work with children or vulnerable adults are enhanced. Standard CRB checks are no longer available for work with children or vulnerable adults, but remain available where checks are required for other types of work or licences [see Criminal record checks, above].
-
Where a criminal record check is required for certain types of work with children or vulnerable adults, for example under the Care Standards Act 2000, it continues to be required.
-
Where a criminal record check is not required, but is permitted under various Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Orders, an employer or organisation which considers it appropriate may carry out a check. Checks continue to be unlawful where they are not permitted.
-
Regulated activities. An employer or organisation which manages or controls regulated activity is called in the Home Office guidance a RAP a regulated activity provider. The range of regulated activities from which people can be barred is now wider than it was before October 2009, especially in relation to work with vulnerable adults, but some aspects of regulated activity were eased following the Singleton review [see Regulated activity below].
-
Duty to refer. Employers and service providers of regulated and controlled activities, social services, professional regulators, and personnel suppliers (employment agencies, employment businesses and education institutions) must notify the ISA of relevant information about individuals who pose a threat to children or vulnerable adults. The ISA's detailed referral guidance, including the procedure for referrals, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/34rfbpv. It is a criminal offence for a body which has a statutory duty to refer to fail to do so without having a reasonable excuse.
-
Employers and organisations which do not have a duty to refer, parents/private employers, and members of the public may but do not have to refer information to social services or the police, who will investigate and if appropriate refer it on to the ISA.
-
Vetting and barring. Decisions about inclusion on the children's barred list (which replaced the Protection of Children Act list and list 99) and the adults' barred list (which replaced the Protection of Vulnerable Adults list), are made by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). Employers and volunteer-using organisations find out if someone is barred via an enhanced CRB check.
-
It is an offence for a barred individual to seek or undertake a regulated activity, whether paid or unpaid, with children or vulnerable adults, or for an employer or organisation knowingly to allow a barred person to engage in a regulated activity, or to engage in a controlled activity without adequate supervision.
-
The ISA will continuously monitor criminal records and information from employers, social services, ,regulators etc, and will review barring decisions as relevant new information becomes available. Under the original VBS, if the monitoring results in barring of an individual, employers who had registered an interest would be notified. This provision will not be implemented at this stage. Even when and if it is implemented, employers will not be notified of criminal offences, convictions or other information that does not result in barring. This information will continue to be available only through CRB checks.
The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, setting out the legislative framework for the scheme, is at www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/2006/cukpga_20060047_en_1,
with explanatory notes at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/en2006/2006en47.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
REGULATED ACTIVITY UNDER THE VETTING AND BARRING SCHEME
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In relation to the vetting and barring scheme [see above], a regulated activity is one which involves contact with children or vulnerable adults and:
-
takes place frequently or intensively and is of a specified nature, including teaching, training, instruction, care, supervision, some advice or guidance, some treatment or therapy, some transport, or moderating an internet chatroom etc likely to be used wholly or mainly by children or vulnerable adults; or
-
takes place frequently or intensively and is in a specified place such as a school or care home; or
-
most fostering or childcare; or
-
being a governor of an educational body.
Under the original legislation, "intensively" meant it took place overnight or on three or more days in a 30-day period. Following the Singleton review of the definition of regulated activity in autumn 2009, the definition of "overnight" remains an activity that takes place between 2am and 6am and has the opportunity for face to face contact with a child or vulnerable adult. But from 1 April 2010, the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Regulated Activity, Devolution and Miscellaneous Provisions) Order 2010 redefined intensively as four or more days in a 30-day period. The order is at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/plain/uksi_20101154_en.
The legislation does not define "frequently". Home Office guidance originally defined it as taking place once a month or more, but the Home Office vetting and barring scheme guidance issued in March 2010 defined it generally as being carried out once a week or more frequently on an ongoing basis. But in relation to health and social care it generally remains once a month or more. These definitions are in appendix B of the guidance, which has the status of statutory guidance.
Other changes following the Singleton review, as set out in the Home Office guidance, include:
-
Being a trustee of a children's or vulnerable adults' charity is not a regulated activity, unless the trustee is carrying out a specified activity or working in a specified setting frequently or intensively.
-
Private arrangements between parents or friends are not regulated. But where an organisation makes the decision about who will have contact with a child or vulnerable adult, it becomes a regulated activity.
-
Exchange visits of less than 28 days, where overseas parents take responsibility for selecting the volunteer host family, are treated as private arrangements.
-
Going into different schools or similar settings to work with different groups is not a regulated activity, but if the writer (or whoever) goes into the same setting often enough for it to be frequent or intensive, it becomes a regulated activity.
-
16-18 year olds who engage in regulated activity as part of their continuing education will not have to register with the ISA.
-
There is a three-month exemption from the requirement to register for overseas visitors bringing their own group of children to the UK, provided the visitors work only with their own group. If they work with other children, ISA registration is required.
The Home Office guidance is at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/VBS_guidance_ed1_2010.pdf.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
REGISTRATION OF HEALTH AND ADULT SOCIAL CARE PROVIDERS
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Voluntary sector providers of healthcare and adult social care who are currently registered under the Care Standards Act 2000 will have to re-register with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) by 1 October 2010 if they carry out regulated activities as defined under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. Organisations which are not currently registered under the Care Standards Act will also have to register with the CQC if they carry out regulated activities.
Regulated activities include some but not necessarily all provision of domiciliary personal care; accommodation for people who require nursing or personal care or treatment for substance abuse; treatment of disease, disorder or injury; surgical procedures; diagnostic and screening procedures; where immediate action or attention is needed, telephone or email medical advice by a body established for that purpose; maternity services, termination of pregnancy and some family planning services; and nursing services that are not part of another regulated activity. This is only a summary and it will be a criminal offence to engage in a regulated activity without being registered with the CQC, so organisations which think they may be required to register should take advice.
The regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100781_en_1.
The Care Quality Commission's website is at www.cqc.org.uk.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH2 chapter 26)
VOLUNTEERING
CHILDCARE AND OTHER CARE COSTS AND NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE
Updated 16/2/09. This information is included in s.39.4.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The National Minimum Wage Act 1998 s.44 said that 'voluntary workers' volunteers who receive any money or benefit — are entitled to minimum wage unless the only money they receive for their volunteering is reimbursement of expenses incurred in carrying out their duties and, in some very specific situations, subsistence payments to cover meals and living expenses; and/or the only benefit in kind they receive from their volunteering is training whose sole or main purpose is to improve the work they do as a volunteer, and subsistence or accommodation reasonable for the work.
This is clearly a very narrow definition but in practice HM Revenue & Customs, who enforce minimum wage, did not treat reimbursement of expenses incurred in order to volunteer as entitling the person to minimum wage. But as part of a review of minimum wage in 2007, the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform said that reimbursement for such costs, in particular childcare and other care costs, is a benefit and should entitle volunteers who receive it to minimum wage.
Following a campaign by volunteer-using organisations against BERR's approach, s.14 of the Employment Act 2008 amended s.44 of the NMWA from 13 January 2009, to make clear that reimbursement of expenses to enable a person to volunteer does not trigger entitlement to minimum wage. This includes travel to the place of volunteering, and childcare and other care costs.
The Employment Act 2008 is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080024_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH2 chapter 35)
EQUALITY
EQUALITY ACT
Updated 13/7/10. This information updates chapters 28 and 42 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Equality Act received royal assent on 8 April 2010, with most of the provisions coming into force in October 2010.
The Act will replace all of the existing equality legislation and cover the protected characteristics of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, race (which includes colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins), religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation (ss.4-12), as well as pregnancy and maternity (ss.17-18). The Act is intended to simplify the law, sort out the disparities between the different discrimination "strands", extend some existing protections, and introduce new protections.
The Act is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/plain/ukpga_20100015_en. Very long (but very useful) explanatory notes are at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/en/plain/ukpgaen_20100015_en. The explanatory notes provide examples of how the legislation applies.
The Government Equalities Office published four Equality Act 2010: What do I need to know? guides on 5 July 2010:
-
A summary guide to your rights
-
A summary guide for voluntary and community sector service providers
-
A summary guide for public sector organisations
-
A summary guide for businesses who sell goods and services
All four guides can be accessed via tinyurl.com/36dgn7o.
In addition, ACAS has produced the ACAS guide to the Equality Act: What's new for employers?, which can be accessed at www.acas.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3017. The booklet includes a table showing which aspects of discrimination legislation will stay the same, which will change, which are new, and which are not covered in either existing legislation or the Act. You can print out the table on its own from the same website - it's very pretty when printed out in colour.
The Act is divided into the following sections and schedules:
Part 1 (ss.1-3): Social-economic inequalities
Part 2 (ss.4-27) & sch.1: Key concepts
Part 3 (ss.28-31) & sch.2-3: Services and public functions
Part 4 (ss.32-38) & sch.4-5: Premises
Part 5 (ss.39-83) & sch.6-9: Work
Part 6 (ss.84-99) & sch.10-14: Education
Part 7 (ss.100-107) & sch.15-16: Associations
Part 8 (ss.108-112) & sch.17: Prohibited conduct: Ancillary
Part 9 (ss.113-141): Enforcement
Part 10 (ss.142-148): Contracts etc
Part 11 (ss.149-159) & sch.18-19: Advancement of equality
Part 12 (ss.160-188) & sch.20: Disabled persons: Transport
Part 13 (ss.189-190) & sch.21: Disability: Miscellaneous
Part 14 (ss.191-197) & sch.22-23: General exceptions (including charities)
Part 15 (ss.198-201): Family property
Part 16 (ss.202-218) & sch.24-28: General and miscellaneous
The Act applies to England and Wales. It also applies to Scotland, apart from s.190 (improvements to let dwelling houses) and part 15 (family property). Only s.82 (offshore work), s.105(3),(4) (expiry of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002), and s.199 (abolition of the presumption of advancement) apply in Northern Ireland; the rest of the Act does not apply there as NI has separate equality legislation.
The provisions are summarised below, with key differences from the current legislation. Note that these are summaries of a lengthy (218 clauses, 28 schedules) and complex piece of legislation, and it is essential to consult the relevant sections of the Act and the explanatory notes.
Unless indicated otherwise, the provisions are expected to come into effect in October 2010. Before then, the Equality and Human Rights Commission will produce statutory codes of practice and non-statutory guidance on employment and on services, public functions and associations; as well as a code of practice on equal pay and non-statutory guidance on education.
ACTION: Start reviewing your equality and diversity policies and procedures and harassment procedures to ensure they will comply with the new legislation when it comes into effect. With luck someone will produce a template that can be used as a starting point, but I am not aware of any yet.
Think about the hidden discriminations and harassments in your organisation. These could include, for example, treating a worker or service user less favourably not because they have a particular characteristic but because people think they have it or because the person is associated with someone who has the characteristic; discrimination against transsexuals; making assumptions about older or younger people; allowing comments that could constitute harassment to go unchallenged.....
Although not all aspects of the Act apply to all of the protected characteristics, assume that they do. It's easier than trying to remember which do and don't apply to a particular characteristic.
If you give preference to certain groups, for example by providing services only to people with a particular protected characteristic, take advice about whether it will be lawful to continue to do so (see, in particular, Charities below).
Equality Act Part 1: Social-economic inequalities
-
Socio-economic duty (ss.1-3). Government departments and key public bodies such as local authorities and NHS bodies will have a new duty to consider, in their strategic decisions, reducing socio-economic inequalities . This will apply only at strategic level not to decisions about individuals.
Equality Act Part 2: Key concepts
-
Definition of disability (s.6 & sch.1). There will no longer be a requirement to consider a list of eight capacities, such as mobility, speech, hearing or eyesight, when assessing whether a person is disabled.
-
Definition of gender reassignment (s.9). Protection will be extended to all transsexuals: not only those who are planning to undergo, are undergoing or have undergone gender reassignment surgery, but also those who are living, or transitioning to living, in the gender other than they one they were born in.
-
Definition of race (s.9). Race includes colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins. There is provision for caste to be added to the definition, if evidence shows this is needed.
-
Direct discrimination (s.13). The definition of direct discrimination will be broadened to apply whenever one person is, because of a protected characteristic, treated less favourably than another person is or would be treated. Specific provisions will allow for different treatment because of age where it is justified as a proportionate means of meeting a legitimate aim, and for treating a disabled person more favourably than a person who is not disabled.
The definition of direct discrimination is broad enough to cover discrimination because the person is the spouse, partner, parent, carer or otherwise associated with a person who has a protected characteristic (see Discrimination by association), or where a person is thought to have a protected characteristic even if they do not. However, discrimination by association does not apply where the protected characteristic is marriage/civil partnership in this case the person who is discriminated against must be the one who is married or a civil partner.
-
Dual discrimination (s.14). A new provision (expected implementation April 2011) will allow for claims to be brought on any combination of two protected grounds, excluding marriage/civil partnership. This has been criticised because it does not allow a claim to be brought on more than two grounds.
-
Discrimination arising from disability (s.15). This will extend the legal protection for disabled people so that it reverts to the position before the House of Lords decision in the Malcolm case.
-
Absence from work due to gender reassignment (s.16). This replicates the Sex Discrimination Act provision against treating a person who is absent from work because they propose to undergo, are undergoing or have undergone gender reassignment, less favourably than they would be treated if they were ill or injured.
-
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination (ss.17-18). These cover discrimination because of pregnancy, or in the 26 weeks after the birth for a reason connected with having given birth or breastfeeding.
-
S.17 will extend pregnancy/maternity protection in relation to public functions, education and associations, and explicitly covers breastfeeding. Pregnancy and maternity discrimination under s.17 is not sex discrimination, but under s.13, it will be direct sex discrimination to treat a woman less favourably because she is breastfeeding a baby who is more than 26 weeks old.
ACTION: Consider whether it is possible to provide breastfeeding facilities for women attending your organisation's activities or services.
-
S.18 makes it unlawful pregnancy/maternity discrimination (but not sex discrimination) to treat a woman less favourably because she is pregnant or has a pregnancy-related illness, is on statutory maternity leave (compulsory, ordinary or additional) or has sought to take statutory maternity leave. The protected period starts when the pregnancy begins. If she is entitled to ordinary and additional maternity leave the protected period ends at the end of the AML period or when she returns to work, whichever is earlier; if she is not entitled to OML and AML, the protected period ends two weeks after the birth.
-
Indirect discrimination (s.19). This will harmonise the definition of indirect discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. It includes disability, to which indirect discrimination does not currently apply under the Disability Discrimination Act, but does not cover pregnancy/maternity.
-
Duty to make adjustments (ss.20-22). Under current provisions in the DDA, the duty to make reasonable adjustments in relation to employment applies where a disabled person is put at a "substantial disadvantage"; in relation to service delivery the duty applies where it is "impossible or unreasonably difficult" for a disabled person to use the service. Under the Equality Act there is only one threshold: that a disabled person is put at a substantial disadvantage in relation to a provision, criterion or practice, a physical feature, or the lack of auxiliary aids or services that would remove the disadvantage.
ACTION: Consider whether the new threshold in relation to service delivery means you will need to make adjustments to procedures or premises, or will need to provide auxiliary aids or services.
-
The Act says that information should be provided in accessible formats if a disabled person is placed at a substantial disadvantage by failure to do so. This includes websites as well as information provided on paper or in other electronic media.
-
Except where the Equality Act explicitly allows, the cost of a reasonable adjustment cannot be passed on to the disabled person.
-
Comparators (s.23). In cases of direct or indirect discrimination, the comparator or comparators in the case of dual discrimination must be an actual or hypothetical person who does not have the protected characteristic but whose circumstances are not (or are assumed not to be) materially different from those of the claimant.
-
In a claim involving disability, the circumstances can include the respective abilities of the claimant and comparator.
-
In a claim involving sexual orientation, the fact that one person is married and the other is in a civil partnership is not a material difference in circumstances.
-
Alleged discriminator's circumstances (s.24). It will not be a defence for an alleged discriminator to say that s/he shares the relevant characteristic with the victim.
-
Discrimination strands (s.25). This section sets out what is meant by references to the types of discrimination.
-
Harassment (s.26). The definitions of harassment are harmonised between the various equality strands. There will be three types of harassment:
(1) Unwanted conduct related to a particular protected characteristic which has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the complainant or violating the complainant's dignity. This will not cover pregnancy/maternity or marriage/civil partnership.
(2) Sexual harassment: unwanted conduct of a sexual nature where this has the same purpose or effect as the first type.
(3) Treating someone less favourably because they have either submitted to or rejected sexual harassment or harassment related to sex or gender reassignment.
-
Victimisation (s.27). The definition of victimisation is not changed, but it will no longer be treated as a form of discrimination, so there will no longer be a need for a comparator who has not made or supported a claim of discrimination.
Equality Act Part 3: Services and public functions
-
What is covered (ss.28-31 & sch.2 & 3). This part of the Act will harmonise and extend provisions on discrimination, harassment or victimisation in the provision of services (including goods and facilities) or the performance of public functions, and will continue to require reasonable adjustments to be made for disabled people. Public function will be defined in the same way as under the Human Rights Act 1998.
-
Age discrimination (s.28). A claim of discrimination or harassment on the basis of being under 18 years of age will not be able to be brought. This has the effect of banning age discrimination in relation to people aged 18 or over in the provision of services or public functions. This is expected to come into force in 2012, with regulations setting out when age-based treatment would be justified or beneficial and therefore allowed.
ACTION: Start thinking now about whether age restrictions in your activities or services are likely to fall within what is allowed when these provisions come into effect.
-
Exceptions (ss.28-29). A claim for discrimination or harassment in services or public functions will not be able to be brought in relation to marriage/civil partnership.
-
Very significantly, there continues to be no protection from harassment because of sexual orientation or religion/belief in the provision of services or public functions although s.212(5) makes clear that such harassment may amount to direct discrimination.
-
Where an act of discrimination, harassment or victimisation in the provision of services or public functions is unlawful under part 4 of the Act (premises), part 5 (work) or part 6 (education), those provisions apply.
-
Services provided in-house to employees (s.31). Under a new provision, where an employer arranges for another person to provide a service to a closed group of employees, the members of that closed group will be treated as a section of the public in relation to the service provider. The service provider will thus have a duty not to discriminate or harass because of any protected characteristic, and to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.
ACTION: If you buy in services for your employees, consider making it part of your contract with the supplier that they comply with the Equality Act and in particular that they make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees. They will have a duty to do this anyway, but including it in the contract makes it clear.
Equality Act Part 4: Premises
-
What is covered (ss.32-38). This part of the Act prohibits discrimination, harassment and victimisation in relation to the disposal, management and occupation of premises. Most of the provisions are the same as in the current legislation.
-
Exceptions (ss.32-35). There will continue to be no protection against discrimination or harassment in relation to premises because of marriage/civil partnership or age. There will continue to be no protection against harassment because of sexual orientation or religion/belief when disposing of premises, by withholding permission to dispose of premises or in the management of premises, although such harassment may constitute direct discrimination.
-
Where an act of discrimination, harassment or victimisation in relation to premises is unlawful under part 5 of the Act (work) or part 6 (education), those provisions apply. Where accommodation is provided as a short-term let or as part of a service or public function, part 3 (services and public functions) apply rather than part 4.
-
Leasehold and commonhold premises and common parts (ss.36-37 & sch.4 & 5). Those who let premises, commonhold associations, and those who are responsible for the common parts of let or commonhold premises in England and Wales have a duty to make reasonable adjustments. The provisions in relation to common parts are new, and allow a disabled person to be charged for adjustments to enable him or her to use common parts.
-
There is provision for regulations to be made in Scotland entitling disabled people to make disability-related alterations to the common parts of some residential property in Scotland.
Equality Act Part 5: Work
Chapter 1: Employment etc (ss.39-59, sch.6)
-
This chapter sets out how the provisions on work apply to employees and applicants (ss.39-40), contract workers (s.41), police officers (ss.42-43), partnerships (ss.44-46), barristers and advocates (ss.47-48), office holders (ss.49-52), qualifications bodies (ss.53-54), employment services (ss.55-56), trade organisations (s.57) and local authority members (ss.58-59).
-
The provisions are basically the same as in current legislation except for those on harassment of employees and applicants, which will be extended to cover harassment because of all the protected characteristics apart from pregnancy/maternity or marriage/civil partnership (s.40). Under current legislation, only sex harassment is covered.
-
Employers continue to be liable for harassment by a third party (customer, client etc) if the harassment has occurred on at least two previous occasions, the employer is aware that it has taken place, and the employer has not taken reasonable steps to prevent it happening again.
-
Pre-employment questions about health (s.60). This is a new provision. Until a candidate has been offered a job (whether on a conditional or unconditional basis) or been included in a pool of successful candidates to be offered a job when a suitable position arises, questions about health will be able to be asked only in specific circumstances. These are where questions are necessary to find out whether an applicant would be able to participate in an assessment to test their suitability for the work, or to make reasonable adjustments to enable the disabled person to participate in the recruitment process, or to find out whether an applicant would be able to undertake a function that is intrinsic to the job, with reasonable adjustments in place as required; or to monitor diversity in applications for jobs; or to support positive action in employment for disabled people; or to enable an employer to identify suitable candidates for a job where there is a genuine occupational requirement for the person to be disabled. Questions can also be asked where they are needed in the context of national security vetting.
ACTION: Get ready to remove any questions about health on job applications etc, unless you are sure they fall within one of the allowed exceptions.
Chapter 2: Occupational pension schemes (ss.61-63)
-
Non-discrimination rule (ss.61-62). All occupational pension schemes will have a "non-discrimination rule" read into them which prohibits a "responsible person" from discriminating against, harassing or victimising a scheme member or person who could become a member of the scheme. Decisions on the basis of age are not unlawful where they are allowed by law.
-
Current legislation includes a non-discrimination rule in relation to age, disability, religion/belief, and sexual orientation. The Equality Act will extend it to race, sex, marriage/civil partnership, and gender reassignment.
-
Communications with disabled persons (s.63). This section applies to communications with certain disabled people who are entitled to benefits under an occupational pension scheme.
Chapter 3: Equality of terms (ss.64-80 & sch.7)
-
Sex equality clause and sex equality rule (ss.64-69). A sex equality clause, providing for equality between men and women in pay and other contractual terms of employment for equal work, will be read into contracts of employment, and a similar sex equality rule will be implied into the terms of pension schemes. The equality clause and equality rule apply to employees, office holders and members of the armed forces.
The definition of equal work is basically the same as in current legislation.
-
Sex discrimination (ss.70-71). The sex discrimination provisions of the Act do not apply where an equality clause or equality rule operates (i.e. in relation to contractual terms and conditions where there is an actual comparator). The sex discrimination provisions will apply to non-contractual pay and benefits such as promotion, transfer and training; offers of employment or appointment; and situations involving contractual pay where there is no comparator. This latter provision is new, allowing claims to be brought even where there is no actual comparator doing equal work, for example where an employer says to a woman, "I would pay you more if you were a man".
-
Pregnancy and maternity equality (ss.72-76). These sections include provisions for a maternity equality clause and maternity equality rule, to protect a woman's pay and pension rights while on maternity leave. There is no need for a comparator for these claims. The provisions replicate those in current legislation.
-
Discussions about pay (s.77). This section introduces a ban on secrecy clauses or other provisions which prevent employees discussing their own pay or asking colleagues about their pay, where the purpose is to find out whether there is a connection between any difference in pay and a protected characteristic. This includes not only written restrictions, but also informal ones ("Don't tell anyone about this pay rise/bonus"). Any action taken against an employee by an employer as a result of such discussions is treated as victimisation.
ACTION: If your organisation prohibits employees talking about their pay or asking colleagues about their pay, get ready to remove the prohibitions.
-
Gender pay gap information (s.78). Regulations may be made requiring private and voluntary sector employers with at least 250 employees in Great Britain to publish information about the differences in pay between their male and female employees. This will not be implemented until at least April 2013 and only if sufficient progress on voluntary reporting has not been made. The Conservatives said before the election that they would not implement this.
ACTION: Organisations with 250 or more employees should probably start collecting relevant information now. The Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued guidance on indicators and reporting see Gender pay gap reporting below. It would be good practice to smaller organisations also to collect the information.
-
Comparators (s.79). This section restates the current provisions on comparators, including that a comparator may be a predecessor who did the same job.
Chapter 4: Supplementary (ss.81-83 & sch.8 & 9)
-
Genuine occupational requirements (sch.9). The genuine occupational requirement (GOR) provisions for all the protected characteristics will be standardised, while continuing to allow specific exemptions where these are justified. Any requirement that a person be of a particular sex, race, disability, religion/belief, sexual orientation or age, or must not be a transsexual person, married or a civil partner, will have to be crucial to the post (and not merely one of several factors) and must be proportionate to achieve a legitimate aim.
ACTION: After the Act is implemented it will be important to look at the detail of these provisions whenever you might want to limit recruitment to people with a particular characteristic or characteristics. A post which previously fell within the genuine occupational requirement or genuine occupational qualification provisions might not fall within the new rules.
-
Exemptions. Current provisions which allow some types of discrimination are restated. They include the following.
-
Discrimination on grounds of sex, marriage/civil partnership and/or sexual orientation in employment for purposes of an organised religion (para.2), and discrimination on grounds of religion/belief in some cases where the employer has an ethos based on religion or belief (para.3);
-
Age discrimination in relation to retirement (para.8-9), benefits based on length of service (para.10), national minimum wage for young workers and apprentices (para.11-12), redundancy schemes (para.13), life assurance (para.14), employers' provision of childcare only for children of a particular age (para.15 - a new provision), and employer contributions to personal pension schemes (para.16);
-
Pregnancy/maternity discrimination in allowing employers not to offer the benefits of non-contractual terms and conditions while an employee is on maternity leave (para.17);
-
Sexual orientation discrimination in allowing benefits to be provided to married employees but not to employees in civil partnerships for periods of service prior to 5 December 2005, when the Civil Partnerships Act 2004 came into force (para.18).
This is not a full list of the exceptions in schedule 9.
Equality Act Part 6: Education
-
Schools. Among the new provisions are protection for school pupils from discrimination or harassment because of gender reassignment and pregnancy/maternity (s.84); protection from discrimination because of gender reassignment or pregnancy/maternity in the admission of pupils (s.85); extension of protection for pupils from being victimised because a parent has made or supported a complaint of discrimination in relation to any protected characteristic, rather than only in relation to disability as at present (s.86); and an
obligation on local authorities and schools to prepare and implement accessibility strategies and plans, to increase disabled pupils' access to the curriculum and improve the physical environment and the provision of information (s.88, sch.10).
-
A provision that the prohibitions against discrimination do not apply in relation to the content of the school curriculum will be extended to all protected characteristics, not just religion/belief as at present (s.89). The examples given in the explanatory notes to the Act are that the teaching of evolution is not religious discrimination against a pupil whose religious beliefs include creationism, and the inclusion of The Taming of the Shrew is not discrimination against a girl.
-
Sch.11 sets out exceptions for schools, for example single-sex schools; faith schools; acts of worship or religious observance by schools; and (where allowed) admission on the basis of ability and aptitude.
-
Further and higher education (ss.92-93). Among the new provisions are protection from discrimination, harassment or victimisation because of all the protected characteristics, not just disability as at present, in decisions about who to enrol and in the provision of services after enrolment; and similar protections in relation to recreational or training facilities provided by local authorities.
-
A provision that the prohibitions against discrimination do not apply in relation to the content of the curriculum will be extended to all protected characteristics, not just religion/belief as at present (s.94).
-
Sch.12 sets out exceptions for further and higher education, for example single-sex institutions; training for work which can lawfully be restricted to people with a particular protected characteristic; institutions with a religious ethos; restricting access to accommodation to married people/civil partners and excluding people who are unmarried/not in a civil partnership; and provision of childcare for students' children of a particular age.
-
General qualifications bodies (s.96). The provisions on reasonable adjustments in relation to qualifications, which currently apply only in relation to disability, will be extended to apply to all protected characteristics except marriage/civil partnership..
-
Reasonable adjustments (sch.13). The detailed requirements for schools, educational institutions and qualifications bodies in relation to reasonable adjustments for disabled people are mostly the same as in current legislation.
-
Educational charities and endowments (s.99, sch.14). This replicates a provision in the Sex Discrimination Act which allows for the trust deeds of educational charities whose beneficiaries are single sex to be modified so benefits can be provided to both sexes.
Equality Act Part 7: Associations
-
Definition of association (s.107). For the purposes of the Act an association is defined as a body with 25 or more members, where access to membership is controlled by rules and involves a selection process. An association may be incorporated or unincorporated, and may operate for profit or on a not for profit basis.
-
Definition of associate (s.107). An associate of association A is a person who is not a member of A, but by virtue of being a member of another association (B) is entitled to many of the rights that members of A have.
-
Members and associates (ss.101,103). At present, an association cannot discriminate against or victimise an existing or potential member or associate because of race, disability and sexual orientation. This will be extended to include sex, age, religion/belief, pregnancy/maternity, and gender reassignment (but not marriage/civil partnership). There will be protection against harassment because of most of the protected characteristics, but not because of religion/belief or sexual orientation.
ACTION: Consider whether your organisation's membership provisions or membership benefits are discriminatory.
-
Associations for people with a shared characteristic (sch.16 para.1). An exception to s.101 allows an association to limit its membership to people who share a protected characteristic (but not the characteristic of being of a particular colour). At present this applies only in relation to race and sexual orientation, but will be extended to all protected characteristics.
-
Guests (ss.102-103). At present it is unlawful to discriminate against, harass or victimise existing or potential guests because of disability. Protection against discrimination and victimisation will be extended to cover all protected characteristics apart from marriage/civil partnership, religion/belief and sexual orientation.
-
Health and safety of pregnant women (sch.16 para.2). An association will be able to treat a pregnant member, associate or guest differently if it reasonably believes that not doing so would create a risk to her health and safety, and the association would take similar measures in relation to people with other physical conditions. This is a new provision.
-
Political parties (ss.104-105). Single-sex shortlists for election candidates will continue to be allowed until 2030. For other protected characteristics, political parties will be able to take positive measures to bring in candidates from under-represented groups, but this must be proportionate and must not involve restricting the shortlist only to people with the protected characteristic. A political party will be able to reserve a specific number of places on a shortlist for people with a particular characteristic, but not the whole shortlist.
Equality Act Part 8: Prohibited conduct: Ancillary
-
Relationships that have ended (s.108). It is already unlawful to discriminate against or harass a person after an employment relationship has ended, or to discriminate against or harass a person on the basis of sexual orientation or religion/belief after a relationship involving the provision of goods, services or facilities has ended. This protection will be extended to all protected characteristics, including age when the provisions on age discrimination in service delivery come into effect.
-
Where a disabled person continues to be at a substantial disadvantage even after a relationship has ended, there will be a duty to make reasonable adjustments. The explanatory notes to the Act give the example of an employer who gives ex-employees lifetime use of in-house gym facilities, having to make adjustments to allow a disabled ex-employee to use the facilities.
-
Liability of employers and principals, employees and agents; instructing, causing, inducing or aiding contraventions (ss.109-112). These sections replace and extend similar provisions which make clear that both the person carrying out an unlawful act, and any person on whose behalf or under whose instruction they were acting, can be held liable for the act.
Equality Act Part 9: Enforcement
-
Tribunal recommendations in employment cases (s.124). Employment tribunals will be allowed to make wider recommendations in discrimination cases, requiring an employer to take specific steps in relation to the wider workforce rather than just in relation to the worker who has made the complaint.
-
Burden of proof (s.136). In discrimination, harassment and victimisation cases the claimant must initially establish sufficient facts which point to a breach of the Act having occurred. The burden of proof then shifts to the respondent to show that he or she did not breach the provisions of the Act. This principle already applies to most protected characteristics, but the Act will extend it to all of them.
Equality Act Part 10: Contracts etc
This part (ss.142-148) mostly restates existing legislation about the unenforceability of contract conditions which would lead to conduct prohibited by the Act. It is not summarised here.
Equality Act Part 11: Advancement of equality
-
Public sector equality duty (ss.149-157 & sch.18-19). The current race, disability and gender equality duties, which require public bodies to reduce inequality and foster good relations, will be extended to cover age, gender reassignment, pregnancy/maternity, religion/belief, and sexual orientation. It will not apply to marriage/civil partnership. This is expected to come into effect in April 2011.
The equality duty will apply not only to public bodies (listed in sch.19), but also to other bodies that carry out public functions (as defined under the Human Rights Act 1998). Even if they are not carrying out public functions, organisations which receive public sector funding or contracts are likely to have to comply with the duty as part of their grant or contract conditions.
-
Using public procurement to promote equality (s.155). There are powers for specific duties to be imposed on public bodies in relation to their public procurement functions, for example by requiring contractors bidding for public sector contracts to demonstrate how they promote equality. This will not happen before April 2011.
-
Positive action to alleviate disadvantage (s.158). It will remain lawful to use positive action measures, such as targeted training or health services, to alleviate disadvantage experienced by people who share a protected characteristic, reduce their under-representation, and meet their particular needs. Any such measures must be a proportionate way to achieve the relevant aim. Criteria to be taken into account in determining what is proportionate are set out in s.158.
-
Preference in recruitment and promotion (s.159). A controversial new provision will redefine positive action to allow preference to be given in recruitment or promotion to a person from a protected group which is under-represented in the workforce, where there are two equally well suited applicants/candidates. It is unclear whether the government will implement this provision. If it is implemented, it will not allow preference to be given to a person from an under-represented group who is less qualified, and where two people are equally well qualified it will not require preference to be given to the person from the under-represented group.
ACTION: As part of reviewing your equality policies and procedures, consider how your organisation feels about this provision.
Equality Act Part 12: Disabled persons: Transport
This part (ss.160-188) applies to taxis and to private hire, public service and rail vehicles. It is not summarised here.
Equality Act Part 13: Disability: Miscellaneous
-
Reasonable adjustments (s.189 & sch.21). The schedule sets out procedures where consent must be obtained from a landlord before reasonable adjustments to premises or physical features can be made, and consent is refused or not provided.
-
Disability-related improvements to residential premises (s.190). This replaces similar provisions in the DDA on disabled tenants or occupiers getting their landlord's consent to make disability-related improvements to their homes.
Equality Act Part 14: General exceptions
-
Differential treatment (s.191 & sch.22). Schedule 22 sets out various situations in which there is statutory authority to treat a person less favourably because of a protected characteristic (for example, where the law allows a job to be open only to people with a particular characteristic), or services to be restricted to people with a characteristic. It also allows differential treatment of pregnant women for their own protection , and allows people of a particular religion/belief to be appointed to specified educational posts.
-
IMPORTANT: Charities (ss.193-194). Charities will continue to be able to restrict benefits to people who share a protected characteristic, if this is in line with their charitable instrument. But under a new provision, they will be able to do this only if it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (in other words, it can be objectively justified) or is intended to prevent or compensate for a disadvantage. "Charitable instrument" is generally interpreted as the governing document (constitution) or the terms of a restricted donation.
This is a significant change from current equality legislation, which allows charity governing documents to limit their beneficiaries to particular groups, except when defined by colour, without having to justify this restriction. The new rule could put charities at risk of a claim if they cannot justify restricting services to people with a particular protected characteristic.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission's guidance, expected during the summer, is expected to look at this issue, and the Charity Commission has said it will issue supplementary guidance, probably in September 2010.
ACTION: If your charity has objects which restrict beneficiaries on the basis of any protected characteristic, start thinking about whether you could, if you had to, justify this restriction. Watch out for the EHRC guidance and Charity Commission supplementary guidance.
All charities can continue to provide services, activities or facilities specifically for people who share a specific protected characteristic, provided this is a proportionate way to alleviate disadvantage, reduce under-representation or meet their particular needs (see Positive action to alleviate disadvantage, above).
-
Employment, contract work or vocational training will not be able to be restricted to people who share a particular characteristic, except where supported employment is provided to people with the same disability or disabilities.
-
Provided they have done so at all times since before 18 May 2005, charities will be able to continue to require members, applicants for membership or people wanting to use a benefit, facility or service to confirm that they accept a religion or belief.
-
As at present, any provision in the governing document defining beneficiaries or the right to benefits on the basis of colour will be void and is treated as if it were not there. So an object to provide education to black women would be interpreted as "to provide education to women".
-
A new provision will allow single-sex activities for the purpose of promoting or supporting a charity, such as a women-only fun run.
-
Sport (s.195). Single-sex competitions will continue to be allowed where one sex is generally at a disadvantage because of physical strength, stamina or physique. It will remain lawful to restrict participation of transsexuals where this is necessary to uphold fair or safe competition, but not otherwise.
-
Nationality, place of birth. or length of time a person has lived in a particular place can continue to be used as a basis for selection for sports, games or other competitive activities, where the person will be representing a particular place or where the rules of the competition include those eligibility criteria.
-
Religion/belief (s.196 & sch.23). As at present, non-commercial organisations based on religion/belief or set up to promote good relations between people of different religions/beliefs will be able to restrict membership and access to activities, services or facilities on the basis of religion/belief, where this is necessary to comply with the purpose of the organisation or to avoid causing offence to members of the religion/belief.
-
Such organisations will also continue to be able to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in order to avoid conflict with the strongly held convictions of members of the religion/belief, but not in relation to any activity carried out on behalf of a public body under a contract with that body.
-
Communal accommodation (s.196 & sch.23). As at present, single-sex communal accommodation will continue to be able to be provided. Any discriminatory treatment of transsexuals must be objectively justified.
-
Age (s.197). A new provision allows regulations to be made setting out exceptions to the prohibition on age discrimination. These exceptions cannot include work or further or higher education. The explanatory notes to the Act give as examples regulations that would allow concessionary travel for older and younger people, disease-prevention programmes targeted at people in particular age groups on the basis of clinical evidence, and holidays for particular age groups.
Equality Act Part 15: Family property
This part (ss.198-201) is not summarised here.
Equality Act Part 16: General and miscellaneous
-
Civil partnerships on religious premises (s.202). The prohibition on civil partnership registrations being held on religious premises will be removed. Religious organisations in England and Wales which wish to do so will be able to hold civil partnership registrations on their premises.
-
The remainder of this part (ss.203-218 & sch.24-28) is not summarised here. Sch.28 sets out where expressions are defined in the Act.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
DISCRIMINATION BY ASSOCIATION
Updated 22/5/10. This information is included in s.28.1.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 as originally worded applied only to discrimination against a disabled person (as defined in the Act and subsequent legislation). But in a decision on 17 July 2008 the European Court of Justice confirmed that the EU Directive for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation makes it unlawful to directly discriminate against or harass a non-disabled worker because of their association with a disabled person in this case, a non-disabled mother looking after her disabled child.
Following this decision, the employment tribunal confirmed on 27 November 2009 that all relevant sections of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 should be read as applying not only to a disabled person but also to a person associated with a disabled person.
The case was brought by Sharon Coleman, who had asked for flexible working to look after her four-year-old disabled son. Her employer, Attridge Law Solicitors, had granted flexible working to other mothers whose children were not disabled, but did not allow it for Coleman. She resigned, claiming unlawful discrimination on the basis of her son's disability. This kind of discrimination by association is called associative discrimination and was recognised as applying in some types of discrimination cases, but was not covered by the DDA as worded. Now it is, and Coleman eventually, in May 2010, received £12,000 in an out of court settlement.
Parents of children under age 17 (or under 18 if the child is disabled) and carers of adults are entitled to request flexible working. However the employer can, for a variety of reasons, refuse the request. Now that Coleman has won her case in the ECJ, employers will need to consider whether flexible working to care for a disabled person is a reasonable adjustment under the DDA.
The equal treatment directive also applies to religion/belief, sexual orientation and age, so it is likely to be unlawful to discriminate on the basis of someone's association with a person of particular religion, sexual orientation or age. When the Equality Act 2010 comes into force, expected to be October 2010, discrimination or harassment because of association with a person who has any 'protected characteristic' will be unlawful (see the Key concepts section under Equality Act, above).
For briefings on the ECJ and employment tribunal decisions from Bates, Wells and Braithwaite, who represented Sharon Coleman, see www.bwbllp.com/Updates/Detail.aspx?UpdateID=201 and www.bwbllp.com/Updates/Detail.aspx?UpdateID=222.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
DISCRIMINATION IS UNLAWFUL REGARDLESS OF MOTIVE
Added 14/1/10. This information updates s.28.1.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In a case involving Amnesty International, the employment appeal tribunal said in August 2009 that discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin is unlawful even if there is a benign reason for it. The case involved a Sudanese woman who was not hired as a researcher on Sudan, because she came from the north of Sudan and could have been perceived as being associated with ethnic groups linked with the Sudanese government. This, Amnesty argued, could compromise its perceived impartiality, and could put the researcher at risk to her health, safety and security.
The EAT expressed unease at having to decide that Amnesty's action was unlawful, saying it could have implications for employers whose employees work in situations of acute political or ethnic tension. However, it said, race discrimination law does not allow for a defence of justification even in situations like this.
The decision in Amnesty International v Ahmed is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0447_08_1308.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
A DEROGATORY REMARK MAY BE HARASSMENT
Added 14/1/10. This information updates s.28.1.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
While working out her resignation notice, a woman of Indian origin was told by her manager, "We will probably bump into each other in future, unless you are married off in India." The employee was upset by this remark and after taking out a grievance which was not satisfactorily resolved, she claimed harassment on racial grounds.
Under the Race Relations Act 1976 s.3A as amended in 2003, harassment is defined as unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating a person's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the person. In its decision on 12 February 2009, the employment appeal tribunal said that earlier definitions of harassment, from before the statutory definition, should be largely disregarded.
The EAT accepted that the purpose of the comment had not been to harass the employee, but it had had that effect and therefore fell within the statutory definition although it was close to the borderline. At the end of its decision the EAT said that employers and tribunals need to be sensitive to the hurt that can be caused by racially (and other) offensive comments or conduct, but it is also important "not to encourage a culture of hypersensitivity or the imposition of legal liability in respect of every unfortunate phrase".
The decision in Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0458_08_1202.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
DISCRIMINATORY JOB ADVERTS
Added 14/1/10. This information is included in s.28.1.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In the 1984 case of Cardiff Women's Aid v Hartup, it was ruled that a case about a discriminatory job advertisement could be brought only by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (or previously, the Commission for Racial Equality etc) rather than by an individual. However, following a European Court of Justice decision in 2008, the Race Relations Act 1976 was amended to allow a claim to be brought by an individual who is deterred from applying for a job because of an advertisement which is discriminatory on the basis of race. Employers need to ensure that job advertisements are not worded in a way that could put a person of a particular racial or ethnic group or groups, or persons with other characteristics where discrimination is unlawful, off applying.
The Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2008, which amend s.1(1A)(b) of the Race Relations Act 1976, are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20083008_en_1.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
AWARDS FOR INJURY TO FEELINGS
Added 1/5/10. This information updates s.37.4.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In discrimination cases an employer may be ordered by the tribunal to pay a compensatory award which can take into account not only actual or potential money losses, but also personal injury (such as psychiatric illness caused by the discrimination) and injury to feelings. Any amount awarded for injury to feelings is based on Vento guidelines (named after the case in 2002 in which they were set). These guidelines were revised in September 2009 to take account of inflation, and are now £600-6,000 for the lower band, £6,000-18,000 for the middle band, and £18,000-30,000 for the upper band.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
HAIR LENGTH AND SEX DISCRIMINATION
Added 14/1/10. This information updates s.28.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Requiring a male employee to cut his shoulder length hair is not sex discrimination if it is part of a dress code that overall is "gender neutral", an employment tribunal ruled on 4 January 2010. A Metropolitan Police trainee claimed he was treated unfairly because he was required to cut his hair when a woman would not have to. But the EAT said the dress code, which requires employees' standard of dress to be "smart, fit for purpose, and portray a favourable impression of the service", was gender neutral, because a woman who breached the code in another way would be treated the same as the man had been.
The decision in Dansie v The Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0234_09_2010.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
MANAGING TIME OFF FOR RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS AND OBSERVANCE
Added 15/2/10. This information updates s.28.4.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
It can be difficult to weigh up the needs of workers who want or need time off for religious observance, versus the business needs of the organisation, versus the desire to avoid the risk of claims of discrimination on the basis of the worker's religion/belief or not being religious. Can a worker whose religion says they must not work on Saturday (or any other day) be required to work on that day, if there is a genuine need for the work to be done and there is no proportionate alternative to that particular worker doing it? Can non-Christian workers complain about having to take compulsory annual leave if the organisation closes over the Christmas period, or complain if the employer requires them to take annual leave for their own religious holidays?
These and similar issues are summarised in "Managing employee leave for religious holidays and festivals" in the autumn 2009 issue of the Bates Wells & Braithwaite employment law update, via tinyurl.com/yazwrzr. The article looks at the issues, the legislation on religious discrimination, case law decisions, and good practice.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
BELIEF IN CLIMATE CHANGE AS A PROTECTED BELIEF
Added 1/5/10. This information updates s.28.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 cover religion, religious or philosophical belief, and lack of belief.
In a widely publicised case in November 2009, the employment appeal tribunal confirmed that philosophical beliefs based on science, including strongly held beliefs about environmental issues and man-made climate change or indeed, a belief that climate change is not man-made and that resources should be developed could be protected under the regulations.
The EAT said that factors to be taken into account when assessing whether a belief should be protected are:
the belief must be genuinely held;
it must be a belief, and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available;
it must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour;
it must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance;
it must be worthy of respect in a democratic society, not be incompatible with human dignity and not conflict with the fundamental rights of others.
The EAT said that political beliefs such as communism or a belief in free-market capitalism, or scientific beliefs such as Darwinism, could fall within this definition.
The decision in Grainger plc v Nicholson is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0219_09_0311.html.
The substantive case on whether Nicholson was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against because of his beliefs was settled out of court in April 2010.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
EMPLOYEES REFUSING ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO SAME-SEX COUPLES
Added 1/5/10. This information updates s.28.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Overturning an earlier decision by the employment tribunal, both the employment appeal tribunal and the court of appeal have ruled that Islington Council did not unlawfully discriminate against a Christian registrar on the grounds of her religious beliefs by requiring her to officiate at civil partnership ceremonies.
The registrar had requested permission not to conduct the ceremonies as she believed that civil partnerships are against the will of God. When the Council withheld permission and she refused to carry out the work, she was disciplined for gross misconduct and brought claims of discrimination and harassment under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. The employment tribunal found in her favour and held that she had been directly discriminated against on the grounds of her religious belief.
However the EAT (in December 2008) and then the court of appeal (in December 2009) held that she was not directly discriminated against by her employers, because the reason for the disciplinary action against her was not her religious belief but her conduct in refusing to carry out a legitimate duty as instructed. They further held that she had not been indirectly discriminated against, as the aims of Islington Council include providing non-discriminatory services and promoting equal opportunities, and the duty of registrars to officiate at civil partnerships is a means of achieving these aims.
The court of appeal also considered whether there was a conflict of rights between the provisions of the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 and article 9 of the European convention on human rights (freedom of thought, conscience and religion). It held that the prohibition of discrimination under the sexual orientation regulations takes precedence over the right to manifest one's religion, except where the regulations say otherwise (for example regulations allowing religious organisations, in limited circumstances, to discriminate in employment or service delivery on the basis of sexual orientation).
In a similar case the employment appeal tribunal found in November 2009 that Relate Avon had not discriminated unlawfully on the basis of religion by dismissing a counsellor who refused, on religious grounds, to fully commit to providing psycho-sexual counselling to same-sex couples. On 29 April 2010 the court of appeal refused permission for the counsellor to appeal against the EAT decision.
Ladele v London Borough of Islington is at
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/1357.html.
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0106_09_3011.html.
In these cases, as in other cases such as those involving employees wanting to wear a crucifix or other religious symbols where the employer has a policy prohibiting this, the tribunals and courts made a distinction between an employee holding a belief, and manifesting that belief in the workplace.
Stonewall's guide Religion and sexual orientation: How to manage relations in the workplace, includes case studies and advice on how to prevent and respond to incidents at work. It can be downloaded at www.stonewall.org.uk/workplace/1473.asp#religion.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
CATHOLIC ADOPTION AGENCY MAY BE ALLOWED TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST GAY PEOPLE
Added 3/4/10. This information updates s.42.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 provide protection against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in the provision of goods and services. An exception (reg.14) allows religious and other belief-based organisations to restrict services on the basis of sexual orientation, but only if this is necessary to comply with the organisation's doctrines or to avoid conflicting with the strongly held convictions of a significant number of the religion’s or belief's followers, and only if the service is not a public function or funded by a public authority.
Another exception (reg.18) allows charities to restrict services on the basis of sexual orientation if their governing document explicitly allows this, such as a charity set up specifically to provide counselling only to lesbians.
Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) is a charity providing, amongst its other services, an adoption service. Its objects require it to operate within the tenets of the Roman Catholic church, and in line with this, its adoption service is limited to heterosexual couples. Because the service is publicly funded it could not use the "compliance with the organisation's doctrine's" exception in reg.14 to continue its practice of not providing an adoption service to same sex couples, so it approached the Charity Commission to request changes to its memorandum of association so it would fall within reg.18.
The request to amend the objects clause was refused by the Charity Commission in November 2008, and this decision was upheld by the charity tribunal in June 2009. Catholic Care's appeal to the high court illustrates the complex relationship between the sexual orientation regulations, charity law, and articles 8 and 14 of the European convention on human rights, guaranteeing the rights to respect for private and family life and not to be discriminated against in relation to that right.
On 17 March 2010 Mr Justice Briggs, in his ruling, illustrated this complexity: "Mr McCall [for Catholic Care] and Miss Mountfield [for the Equality and Human Rights Commission] laboured hard and persuasively for the opposed conclusions that the adoption of the proposed objects was obviously justifiable, alternatively obviously not justifiable. On the one hand, Miss Mountfield's submission that differential treatment which is not founded on the special needs either of the proposed adoptive parents or the children ... must be discriminatory commands real respect. On the other hand, the very unusual predicament of Catholic Care, its status as an adoption agency of last resort for 'hard to place' children and the arguably pre-eminent needs of those children who will otherwise be left unadopted may constitute a very special and unusual case for recognition under article 14, quite unlike any other to be found in the existing jurisprudence, but none the worse for that."
The Charity Commission's view was that if the analysis got this far, the decision about whether the proposed objects should be approved should be referred back to it for reconsideration. The judge agreed and referred the decision back to the Commission, making the point that in his view the Commission had initially not properly interpreted reg.18 of the sexual orientation regulations. The court also ordered the Commission to pay Catholic Care's legal costs.
The decision in Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) v The Charity Commission for England and Wales is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/520.html .
The Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/uksi_20071263_en_1.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities in service delivery (VSLH2 chapter 37)
MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE IS LAWFUL
Updated 15/1/10. This information updates ss.28.6.1 & 34.2.8 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 do not require an employee to retire at 65 or any other age, but they do set a default retirement age (DRA) which allows employers to require retirement at 65, or another age over (or in some cases under) 65 set by the employer, even if the employee wants to continue working. Heyday, a membership group linked with Age Concern, challenged these retirement provisions in the high court on the basis that forced retirement denying people 65 or over the right to continue working is incompatible with the European equal treatment directive. The court agreed in December 2006 to refer the case to the European Court of Justice.
In its judgment on 5 March 2009, the ECJ said that a statutory provision requiring a person to retire at age 65 or any other age set by the employer is not incompatible with the directive, provided it is "objectively and reasonably justified by legitimate aims, such as those related to employment policy [or] the labour market", and is also an appropriate and necessary means of achieving those aims.
The ECJ referred the case back to the high court, to decide whether the provision in the Age Regulations could be justified in effect weighing one set of social and economic objectives (the government's encouragement to older workers to continue working past 65) against another (enabling employers to plan for the future by knowing when employees will retire).
In its decision on 25 September 2009 the high court said a default retirement age could be justified, on the basis of employment certainty and planning. However, the judge said he did not think it would have been set at 65 if the regulations were being brought in now, and that his decision might have been different if the government had not announced its decision to bring forward its review of the default retirement age.
Although a mandatory retirement age is lawful, requiring an employee to retire is an unfair dismissal unless the procedural requirements in the age regulations are strictly followed. Details of these are available from Business Link via tinyurl.com/yclnjaw and ACAS via tinyurl.com/ybryd6r.
The decision in Age UK, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and others is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/2336.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
REVIEW OF DEFAULT RETIREMENT AGE
Added 15/1/10. This information updates ss.28.6.1 & 34.2.8 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills' review of the default retirement age (see above) has been brought forward from 2011 to 2010. The review will consider how the default retirement age is working in practice, the reasons employers use mandatory retirement ages (requiring their employees to retire at a specific age unless the employee's request to continue working is granted), the experience of employers operating without a mandatory retirement age, whether there should be a statutory default retirement age, and if so what it should be. In his decision in the Heyday case Mr Justice Blake said, "I cannot presently see how 65 could remain as a DRA after the review", so we can probably assume that if there is a DRA it won't be 65.
Information about the pre-review consultation, which closed on 1 February 2010, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/yzxe77l.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
RECURRENCE OF AN INTERMITTENT DISABILITY
Added 1/5/10. This information is included in s.28.7.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 sch.1, disability is defined as a physical (including sensory) or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person’s ability to carry out at least one normal day to day activity. An effect is long-term if it has lasted or is likely to last for at least one year, and/or is likely to last for the rest of the person’s life if this is likely to be less than a year.
If an impairment ceases to have a substantial adverse effect or the effect is intermittent, the Act defines the effect as continuing if it "is likely to recur". Case law previously interpreted "likely to recur" as "more likely than not", but in a decision in July 2009, the House of Lords said it should be interpreted as "could well happen".
This decision increases DDA protection for people with conditions such as diabetes, epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and others which are controlled by treatment or medication or may fluctuate for other reasons.
The decision in SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle (Northern Ireland) is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/37.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
COMPARATOR FOR DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
Updated 1/5/10. This information is included in s.28.7.3 and 42.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 disability discrimination may be direct ("We won't let you in the restaurant because you are blind", or "We are dismissing you because you have an a severe back injury") or disability-related ("We won't let you in because you have a dog", where the reason for the dog is related to the disability, or "We are dismissing you because you have been off work for a year", where the absence is because of the injury).
Following the Clark v Novacold case in 1999, the comparator in disability-related discrimination cases was a non-disabled person to whom the disability-related reason does not apply (because they are not disabled). The type of questions to be asked in the above examples would be "Would a person who is not blind, and who therefore does not bring a dog to a restaurant, be denied entry the restaurant? Would a person who does not have a serious injury, and has therefore not been off work for a year, be dismissed?" If the answer is no, a disabled person who is refused admission or is dismissed is being treated less favourably than the non-disabled person.
In the case of London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm and another on 25 June 2008, the House of Lords controversially said that Clark v Novacold had been wrongly decided, and the correct comparator should be a non-disabled person to whom the reason for the treatment does apply. The questions would be "Would a person who is not blind and brings a dog to a restaurant be denied entry? Would a person who does not have a serious injury or other disability, but has been off work for a year, be dismissed?" If the answer is yes, the disabled person is not being treated less favourably.
The Malcolm case involved service delivery (the provision of housing) and it was unclear whether it would also apply to employment cases. On 5 February 2009, in Child Support Agency v Truman, the employment appeal tribunal confirmed that the Malcolm decision does apply in employment cases, and this has been confirmed in subsequent cases.
These decisions make it much easier for a service provider or employer to show that the reason for their allegedly discriminatory action was not for a disability-related reason because they can now say, for example, that anyone with a dog, or anyone with a long-term absence, would have been treated the same. Similarly it is more difficult for a disabled person to show that the reason for their treatment was related to their disability. This outcome is contrary to the purpose of the Disability Discrimination Act, which is to protect disabled people in situations such as these not to make it harder for them to show that they have been treated less favourably. When s.15 of the Equality Act 2010 comes into effect (expected October 2010) the situation will revert to what it was pre-Malcolm.
In the meantime, a service provider or employer must of course be able to show that they made reasonable adjustments as required under the DDA (in the above examples, to allow blind people to use the restaurant, or to enable the employee to return to work). Failure to do so is in itself discriminatory.
The Malcolm decision is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/43.html.
The Truman decision is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0293_08_0502.html.
The Solicitors Journal has a useful article at tinyurl.com/bfe4rb.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
EMPLOYER'S KNOWLEDGE OF A WORKER'S DISABILITY
Added 1/5/10. This information updates s.28.7.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Employers are obliged to make reasonable adjustments where a provision, criterion, or practice operated by or on behalf of the employer, or any physical feature of the premises occupied by the employer, places a disabled worker at a substantial disadvantage compared with workers who are not disabled.
Under s.4A(3) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, an employer does not have to make adjustments if it does not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know, that a disabled worker, applicant or potential applicant has a disability and is likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage compared to persons who are not disabled.
In Eastern & Coastal Kent PCT v Grey, the employment appeal tribunal said in 2009 that the duty to make reasonable adjustments does not apply if an employer does not know the person has a disability; does not know the person is likely to be substantially disadvantaged compared to others who are not disabled; could not reasonably be expected to know that the person had a disability; and could not reasonably be expected to know that the person is likely to be substantially disadvantaged.
But in Department for Work and Pensions v Alam in November 2009, the employment appeal tribunal said that two questions arise in deciding whether the employer's duty arises:
Did the employer know both that the person was disabled and that he or she was likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage?
If not, ought the employer to have known both that the person was disabled and that he or she was likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage?
If the answer to both questions is no, the employer's duty to make reasonable adjustments does not arise.
Department for Work and Pensions v Alam is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0242_09_0911.html.
The code of practice on disability discrimination and case law make clear that employers should do all they can to find out whether a person has a disability.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
GENDER PAY GAP REPORTING
Added 22/5/10. This information updates s.28.8 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
It is not yet clear whether the Equality Act 2010 provision requiring employers with 250 or more employees to report on the gap between men's and women's pay will be implemented (see Equality Act, above).
In the meantime, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has proposed three indicators that could be used for reporting the gender pay gap: a single figure showing the overall difference between median earnings of men and women; a single figure showing the average difference between men's and women's starting salaries; or the differences between men's and women's pay by grade and job type.
The EHRC has said it expects employers with more than 500 employees to use at least two indicators, or one indicator plus a narrative report explaining the context. Employers with 250-500 employees would be expected to use at least one indicator.
The EHRC's proposed measures are at www.equalityhumanrights.com/fairer-britain/gender-pay-reporting/.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities (VSLH2 chapter 25)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
H&S ADVICELINE AND RESOURCES
Updated 26/4/10. This information is included in chapter 40 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Employers with up to 250 employees can contact a new Health at Work Adviceline for expert advice and support on employee physical and mental health issues. The service is run by the NHS and also involves the Department for Work and Pensions, Department of Health, health and Safety Executive, Scottish Government and Welsh Assembly Government. It is available from 9am-5pm (4.30pm Fridays in Scotland), with an online callback form for use at other times. Contact details are:
England: Health for Work Adviceline, 0800 077 8844, www.health4work.nhs.uk
Scotland: Healthy Working Lives, 0800 019 2211, www.healthyworkinglives.com
Wales: Health at Work Adviceline Wales, 0800 107 0900, www.healthyworkingwales.com.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) website at www.hse.gov.uk, which contains masses of useful information on all aspects of health and safety law and good practice, is gradually being completely updated. Guidance is also available from the Trades Union Congress (TUC), CIPD, and a range of other organisations.
The big news is that since September 2009 many HSE priced publications, including guidance and approved codes of practice (ACOPs), have been free to download in PDF format from the HSE website.
Recent new or updated resources include:
-
Revised first aid website. including a first aid at work assessment tool to help employers work out the number and type of first aiders appropriate for their workplace, at www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/index.htm
-
Revised website on workplace stress at www.hse.gov.uk/stress/index.htm, with management standards, and guidance for board members, chief executives, HR managers, health and safety representatives, line managers and individual workers
-
Revised website on RIDDOR (reporting of injuries, diseases and dangerous occurrences) at www.hse.gov.uk/riddor/index.htm
HSE has a mini-website specifically for governing body members (management committee/trustees/directors) in organisations of all sizes, to help them understand their health and safety duties and promote h&s at work. The "Leading health and safety at work" website is at www.hse.gov.uk/leadership.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CASE
Added 2/4/10. This information updates s.22.3.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
R v Peter Eaton and Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd, the first trial under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, opened in Bristol crown court on 23 February 2010 but was adjourned until October because Eaton needed urgent medical treatment. The case concerns a geologist who was killed when a trench where he had been taking soil samples collapsed.
A corporate manslaughter (called corporate homicide in Scotland) charge can be brought against an organisation, where a person is killed and there has been gross failure by senior management. This could include gross failure to ensure safe working practices, safe premises, safety for consumers or members of the public, or any other serious breach of duty of care.
Under sentencing guidance published in February 2010, the minimum fine for an organisation convicted of corporate manslaughter is unlikely to be less than £500,000 and could be millions of pounds. In most cases the penalty will also include a publicity order, requiring the organisation to publicise its conviction.
In addition to a corporate manslaughter charge brought against the organisation, a manslaughter charge can be brought against an individual who kills someone through a grossly negligent act or omission (failing to do something), without intending to kill them, and individual employees, managers and in some cases governing body members can be fined or even imprisoned, and an incorporated organisation can be fined, for breach of health and safety or similar laws. And a person who has been injured, or the estate of a person who has been killed, can bring a negligence claim against an individual, manager, incorporated organisation or members of the governing body of an unincorporated organisation.
Cotswold Geotechnical faces not only the corporate manslaughter charge but also one for breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. Eaton, a director, has been charged with gross negligence, manslaughter, and a breach of health and safety legislation.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about liability (VSLH2 chapter 19)
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
NEW H&S POSTER AND LEAFLET
Added 14/6/09. This information is included in s.40.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A new version of the HSE poster was published on 6 April 2009, setting out in numbered lists (and with photographs) the obligations of employers and workers in relation to health and safety, and what to do if there is a problem. The H&S leaflet, which has had to be given to employees at workplaces where the employer does not prominently display the poster, has been replaced by a pocket card.
The existing poster and leaflet can be used until 5 April 2014, provided they are readable and the addresses of the enforcing authority and the Employment Medical Advisory Service (both available from the HSE infoline on 0845 345 0055) are up to date.
Welsh, easy read and large print leaflets will be produced, and an MP3 version will be available on the HSE talking leaflets website.
Posters and leaflets can be purchased from bookshops or from the HSE Books on 01787 881165.
Further details are at www.hse.gov.uk/contact/faqs/lawposter.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
TEMPLATE FOR H&S POLICY AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Added 26/4/10. This information updates s.40.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The HSE website now includes a downloadable risk assessment and policy template which brings together an organisation's risk assessment, health and safety policy and record of health and safety arrangements in one document. The template is at www.hse.gov.uk/risk/step4.htm.
Example risk assessments on the HSE website including for charity shops, food preparation and service, office-based businesses, and village halls (also suitable for small community centres and similar premises) can be used as guides for completing the template, or can be used separately from the template. The example risk assessments can be accessed via www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PREGNANT WORKERS
Added 26/4/10. This information updates s.40.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In Hardman v Mallon (trading as Orchard Lodge Nursing Home), the employment appeal tribunal found in 2002 that failure to carry out a health and safety risk assessment in relation to a pregnant employee was not only a breach of health and safety law, but also direct discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.
However, in the case of O'Neill v Buckinghamshire County Council in January 2010, the employment appeal tribunal ruled that there is no general obligation under H&S law to carry out a specific risk assessment in relation to a pregnant woman unless three preconditions are met: the employee has notified the employer in writing that she is pregnant; the work is of a kind which could involve a risk of harm or danger to the health and safety of the pregnant woman or her child; and the risk arises from the workplace processes, working conditions, or physical, chemical or biological agents in the workplace.
If these preconditions are met, a specific risk assessment must be carried out and the employee must be provided with comprehensive information on the identified risks. Failure to do this is a breach of H&S law and could constitute sex discrimination. Even where it may not be clear that the work is of a kind which could involve a risk of harm or danger, it is still sensible for the employer to carry out a risk assessment because of the general duty to assess risk, and because a tribunal could find that in fact the work did meet the preconditions.
The O'Neill decision is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2010/0020_09_0501.html.
The Health and Safety Executive's website on new and expectant mothers is at www.hse.gov.uk/mothers/index.htm.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
GOOD PRACTICE FOR SCHOOL AND YOUTH GROUP TRIPS
Updated 26/4/10. This information updates s.40.6.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Department for Children, Schools and Families' "Learning outside the classroom" website at www.lotc.org.uk includes good practice guidance and resources on school trips and similar youth activities, aiming to reduce the bureaucracy and culture of fear around such activities. In addition to this website, the Health and Safety Executive has a website specifically about school and similar trips, particularly those involving outdoor and adventurous activities. It is at www.hse.gov.uk/schooltrips/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)
FIRE SAFETY CAPABILITIES
Added 2/4/10. This information updates s.40.8 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2010 all employers have a statutory duty to consider the capability of worker(s) who carry out tasks or assignments related to fire safety. This is in addition to employers' general duties to carry out health and safety risk assessments and fire safety risk assessments, and to review them regularly. An assessment of capability should be an implicit part of those risk assessments, so the new regulations simply serve to make it explicit in relation to fire safety.
The Fire Safety (Employees' Capabilities)(England) Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100471_en_1.
Detailed guidance on fire safety, including how to carry out risk assessments for specific types of premises, is on the Department for Communities and Local Government website at www.communities.gov.uk/fire/firesafety/firesafetylaw.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH2 chapter 36)