|
LEGAL UPDATE
FOR VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS:
EMPLOYMENT, VOLUNTEERING,
HEALTH & SAFETY
To be notified when this site is updated, click
to send an email, asking to receive update notifications. Please give your name, organisation, email and postal addresses and telephone number. Your postal address and phone number are used to contact you if emails bounce.
To avoid spamming, an email address is not given on screen. If you can't see the word 'Legalupdate' after 'click' in the first line, or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is legalupdate at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.
This page provides information of a general nature for boards/management committees and staff of voluntary organisations about legal changes over the past year, and forthcoming changes, relating to employment, volunteering, and health and safety.
Information about equal opportunities in employment and provision of services. goods and facilities used to be on this page, but was moved to a separate page, EQUALITY, in January 2012. The equality page also covers human rights.
Another page, MANAGING THE ORGANISATION, covers charity law, company and related law, data protection, electronic communications, internet, intellectual property, human rights, finance, property, licensing etc.
Information about earlier changes is archived at www.sandy-a.co.uk/vslh.htm.
The information and commentary on this website cover the law applicable to England, and may not apply in Wales, Northern Ireland and/or Scotland. It is provided free of charge for information purposes only, and is not a full or definitive statement of the law. Reasonable efforts are made to keep the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by Sandy Adirondack. The information and commentary do not, and are not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person or organisation on a specific case or matter and are not intended as a substitute for professional advice.
Items on this website are cross-referenced to The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3 the 3rd edition of The Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook), by James Sinclair Taylor and the Charity Team at Russell-Cooke Solicitors, edited by Sandy Adirondack. The website items are generally in the same order as in the book. VSLH3 was published in September 2009 and costs £60 for voluntary organisations, £90 others, + 10% p&p. To order, print out the order form at Books by post, or send an email order by clicking
, or ring 020 7232 0726.
If you can't see the word 'Bookorders' or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is bookorders at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.
Dates in red below have been updated in the past three months (more or less).
EMPLOYMENT
Employment resources
(updated 14/1/12)
"Weekly pay" for redundancy pay and unfair dismissal awards for 2011-12
(updated 8/1/12)
In the pipeline for 2012 and beyond
(updated 29/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 26: Rights, duties and the contract of employment
Internships and work placements
(updated 13/1/12)
Rights of agency temps
(updated 13/1/12)
Increase in qualifying period for unfair dismissal
(added 29/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 27: Model contract of employment
Being clear about overtime pay
(added 24/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 29: Taking on new employees
Right to work in the UK
(updated 30/1/11)
TUPE cases and guidance
(added 14/6/09)
VSLH3 Chapter 30: Pay and pensions
Minimum wage
(updated 23/9/11)
Minimum wage, internships and work experience
(added 13/1/12)
Minimum wage and on-call time
(added 13/1/12)
Earnings from permitted work
(updated 2/1/12)
Introduction of real time PAYE information
(added 18/1/12)
Tax allowances and national insurance thresholds for 2012-13
(updated 18/1/12)
National insurance holiday
(updated 18/1/12)
Abolition of cycle to work day breakfasts and other tax reliefs
(added 18/1/12)
Tax-free mileage reimbursement
(added 18/1/12)
Tax treatment of employer-supported childcare and vouchers
(updated 18/1/12)
State pensions
(updated 24/1/12)
Auto-enrolment and the national employment savings trust (NEST)
(updated 29/1/12)
Contracting out of additional state pension
(added 24/1/12)
Pension liability on incorporation, merger or winding up
(updated 2/4/10)
VSLH3 Chapter 31: Working time, time off and leave
On-call time as working time
(updated 2/4/10)
Holiday pay and long-term sickness
(updated 15/2/10)
Statutory sick pay
(updated 8/1/12)
Fit notes
(updated 30/1/11)
Illness during annual leave
(added 15/2/10)
Children and young people as employees
(added 30/1/11)
Right to request time off for training
(updated 22/9/11)
Workers memorial day
(added 15/2/10)
Anti-slavery day
(updated 2/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 32: Rights of parents and carers
Statutory maternity, paternity and adoption leave and pay
(updated 8/1/12)
Additional paternity leave and pay
(updated 8/1/12)
Flexible working to care for children
(updated 2/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 33: Disciplinary matters, grievances and whistleblowing
Code of practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
(updated 15/6/09)
Tribunals can pass whistleblowing disclosures to regulators
(added 2/4/10)
VSLH3 Chapter 34: Termination of employment
Effective date of termination for summary dismissal by post
(added 7/11/10)
Increase in qualifying period for unfair dismissal
(added 29/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 35: Redundancy
Statutory redundancy pay
(updated 8/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 37: Employment claims and settlement
Employment disputes and settlement
(updated 29/1/12)
VSLH3 Chapter 41: Safeguarding children and vulnerable adults
Criminal record checks
(updated 20/6/10)
Vetting and barring scheme
(updated 20/6/10)
Regulated activity under the vetting and barring scheme
(updated 20/6/10)
Registration of health and adult social care providers
(updated 20/6/10)
VOLUNTEERING
VSLH3 Chapter 39: Volunteers
"Fit and proper person" certificate for volunteers?
(updated 13/6/11)
Volunteer rights call to action
(updated 22/3/11)
Issues in reimbursing volunteer expenses
(added 14/11/10)
Volunteers & mileage reimbursement
(added 18/1/12)
Volunteering confirmed not to be an occupation
(updated 31/3/11)
Paid "volunteer" held not to be working under a contract
(added 29/5/11)
Volunteers without sponsorship certificate not allowed into UK
(added 22/3/11)
Children and young people as volunteers
(added 30/1/11)
EQUALITY
VSLH3 Chapter 28: Equal opportunities in employment
VSLH3 Chapter 42: Equal opportunities: Goods, services and facilities
These provisions have been moved to a separate page, EQUALITY, but can still be accessed from this contents list.
Equality Act
(updated 28/5/11)
Equalities Act charities exemption
(updated 11/1/12)
Follow-up on homophobic banter case
(added 28/5/11)
Pregnancy gossip can be discrimination and harassment
(added 28/5/11)
Belief in animal rights and in public service broadcasting as protected beliefs
(updated 13/6/11)
Time off to attend Friday prayers
(added 5/6/11)
TUC/CIPD guidance on managing age in the workplace
(added 28/5/11)
Abolition of default retirement age
(updated 2/1/12)
Comparator for disability discrimination
(updated 10/10/10)
Guidance on equal pay audits
(added 6/9/10)
Compromise agreements and discrimination claims
(added 28/5/11)
Catholic adoption agency still seeking to change its objects
(updated 1/11/12)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
VSLH3 Chapter 40: Health and safety
"Common sense, common safety" h&s proposals
(added 25/5/11)
Abolition of Adventure Activities Licensing Authority
(added 25/5/11)
HSE infoline to disappear on 30 September
(updated 22/9/11)
Risk, liability and the social value of activities
(added 25/5/11)
First corporate manslaughter conviction
(updated 25/5/11)
H&S policies and risk assessments
(updated 25/5/11)
Managing stress at work
(added 25/5/11)
Harassment at work
(added 25/5/11)
Children and young people as employees and volunteers
(added 30/1/11)
Basic first aid leaflet
(added 8/1/12)
RIDDOR changes
(updated 22/9/11)
Register of occupational safety and health consultants
(added 25/5/11)
You can also find legal updates for voluntary organisations on the websites of Bates Wells and Braithwaite Solicitors at www.bwbllp.com and the Charity Team at Russell-Cooke Solicitors at www.russell-cooke.co.uk, and information about changes in tax and finance law on the Sayer Vincent website at www.sayervincent.co.uk.
EMPLOYMENT
EMPLOYMENT RESOURCES
Updated 14/1/12. This information updates various sections in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook.
PEACe the Personnel, Employment Advice and Conciliation service based at London Voluntary Service Council has a dedicated website with a document bank containing template HR policies, model procedures and guidance documents produced in partnership with Russell-Cooke Solicitors. These cover the employment basics through to the complex HR issues encountered by the voluntary and community sector. Many of the resources are free, but for others there is a charge. An annual subscription, providing unlimited downloads and an update alert service, is £100 + VAT, with a 10% discount for LVSC, NCVO or Children England members and Target HR participants. Details are at www.lvsc.org.uk/peace.
The Church Urban Fund has updated Just employment: A guide to employing staff in faith-based projects. This includes a large range of online guidance, case studies and templates intended primarily for faith-based organisations but suitable for most small organisations. It is at tinyurl.com/7g2xzoy. Its eight sections include introduction, recruitment and selection, documentation, pay and reward, performance management, dismissal and redundancy, policies and procedures, and volunteers.
ACAS has created an online "model workplace" to help employers identify and resolve problems at work. Its 10 modules, each of which includes seven to 10 multiple choice questions and takes about 15 minutes, cover recruitment, selection and induction; pay and reward; performance management; flexible working and work-life balance; equality and diversity; communication and involvement; employee representation; discipline and grievance; managing change; and key performance indicators in people management. Details are at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2806.
Enforcing basic workplace rights, published by the Trades Union Congress on 2 December 2011, is intended for union officials and representatives, but useful for everyone. It outlines the role played by the UK's four main employment-related statutory agencies the Health and Safety Executive, Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate, Gangmasters Licensing Authority and HMRC national minimum wage enforcement team and describes the powers of enforcement officers and the sanctions employers can face for breaking employment law. It is at www.tuc.org.uk/tucfiles/177/enforcingbasicworkplacerights.doc.
The government's pay and work rights confidential helpline gives employers, workers and union reps basic information and advice about the national minimum wage, agricultural minimum wage, working time (in particular the 48-hour limit and night work), employment agency standards and gangmaster licensing standards. The telephone helpline is open 8am-8pm weekdays and 9am-1pm Saturdays, on 0800 917 2368 (free from landlines and most mobiles). An online enquiry form is at https://payandworkrights.direct.gov.uk/. The telephone helpline has translation facilities.
The Cranfield Trust has a free internet HR advice service for registered charities. After becoming a member of the service, charities are able to post their HR queries on a dedicated website and receive bespoke answers from experienced HR professionals. Where questions are about sensitive situations, or where confidentiality is required, questions can also be dealt with off forum. More information is available on the Trust's website via tinyurl.com/d25w49. The Trust also provides free tailored management consultancy projects addressing HR and other management issues, working with a national register of 700 volunteer consultants who are management professionals from the commercial sector. Information is at www.cranfieldtrust.org.
Go back to contents
"WEEKLY PAY" FOR REDUNDANCY PAY AND UNFAIR DISMISSAL AWARDS
FOR 2012-13
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates ss.35.7.1, 37.4.2 and various other sections in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook.
From 1 February 2012 the maximum compensatory award for unfair dismissal is increased from £68,400 to £72,300. The maximum basic award is increased from £12,000 to £12,900.
The maximum "weekly pay" for calculating certain statutory entitlements, including statutory redundancy pay for redundancies taking effect on or after 1 February 2012, is increased from £400 to £430.
The limit on guarantee payments when an employee is not provided with work is increased from £22.20 to £23.50, and the minimum compensation for a worker excluded or expelled from a trade union goes up from £7,600 to £8,100.
The Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2011 is at
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/3006/made.
Go back to contents
IN THE PIPELINE FOR 2012 AND BEYOND
Updated 29/1/12. This information updates various other sections in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook.
Changing in 2012
1 February 2012: Increase in "weekly pay" for calculating statutory redundancy pay; increase in maximum awards for unfair dismissal and other awards. See Weekly pay for redundancy pay and unfair dismissal awards.
6 April 2012: The national insurance earnings threshold for statutory maternity, paternity, adoption and sick pay will increase from £102 to £107. Statutory sick pay and maternity, paternity and adoption pay from £128.73 per week to £135.45. See Statutory sick pay and Statutory maternity, paternity and adoption leave and pay.
Subject to parliamentary approval, the qualifying period to claim unfair dismissal will be extended from one year to two years. This will apply only to employees whose qualifying period starts on or after 6 April 2012 so anyone employed by the employer on 5 April will still be able to claim unfair dismissal after only one year. See Qualifying period to claim unfair dismissal.
Employees with certain types of pension will no longer be able to contract out from the additional state pension (state second pension). See Contracting out of additional state pension.
4-5 June 2012: Additional bank holiday on Tuesday 5 June for the Queen's diamond jubilee, with the late May bank holiday moved to Monday 4 June to create a long weekend.
1 October 2012: Auto-enrolment of eligible employees into a pension scheme starts, for employers with more than 120,000 workers (unlikely to apply to anyone reading this website, I think). This will be followed by phased implementation based on number of employees. See Auto-enrolment and the national employment savings trust.
In the pipeline: Resolving workplace disputes
The government consulted from 27 January to 20 April 2011 on proposals to simplify resolution of workplace disputes, and announced its response on 23 November 2011. The consultation documents and response are on the BIS website at tinyurl.com/6r66cxv.
Protected conversations. It is expected that there will be a consultation on the introduction of "protected conversations", which would allow employers to discuss issues such as retirement or poor performance in an open manner with staff, without this being used in any subsequent tribunal claims. Protected conversations would not extend to protect discriminatory acts.
Compromise agreements. The government will consider measures to simplify compromise agreements, and will rename them settlement agreements. A compromise agreement is a legally-defined agreement under which an employee whose working relationship with the employer has become irretrievable agrees, in return for a negotiated financial sum, not to bring a tribunal claim against the employer. The simplification measures could include a standard text for compromise agreements, and amendment of the Employment Rights Act 1996 s.203(3)(b) to make it easier for compromise agreements to cover current and future claims.
To make clear that compromise agreements can be safely used to settle discrimination claims, s.147 of the Equality Act 2010 will be amended [see Compromise agreements and discrimination claims].
Mediation. Mediation schemes are being set up as pilot projects, where employees who are trained as mediators can help resolve employment disputes at an early stage in small and medium enterprises. See Employment disputes and settlement.
Rapid resolution. Following on from suggestions made during the consultation process, the government will consider whether and how a scheme could be introduced as an alternative to the current tribunal process, to provide quicker, cheaper determinations in low value, straightforward claims such as holiday pay. This could involve non-judicial determination based only on papers, without an oral hearing. Any proposals would be subject to consultation.
Early conciliation. Details of all employment claims will have to be submitted initially to ACAS, before they can be lodged with the tribunal. Claimants will be offered pre-claim conciliation, but there will be no obligation on either party to take up the offer. This is different from the original proposal, which would have required all claims to go through pre-claim conciliation with ACAS before they could go to tribunal.
Modernising tribunals. A fundamental review of employment tribunal rules of procedure is being undertaken, with a view to a revised code being issued by April 2012. The review will address concerns that tribunals have become increasingly complex and inefficient over time and are no longer fit for purpose. The government intends to introduce changes in relation to cost and deposit orders, witness statements and witness expenses, and for employment judges to sit alone in unfair dismissal cases. Other changes are likely to follow from the review.
Financial penalties. Financial penalties of up to £5,000 are to be introduced for employers who breach employment rights, so as well as paying compensation to the employee, they could be required to pay a penalty (a fine) to the Exchequer of up to 50% of the tribunal award, subject to a lower limit of £100 and an upper limit of £5,000. Employment judges would have discretion as to whether to serve a penalty on the employer.
Calculation of award and payment limits. Employment tribunal awards and statutory redundancy payments will continue to be automatically up-rated [see Weekly pay for redundancy pay and unfair dismissal awards], but the formula will be modified so they are rounded to the nearest pound. Announcing this change on 23 November 2011, Vince Cable said, "We anticipate that the reduction in redundancy pay and subsequent reduction in associated compensation payments made in employment tribunals will have a direct net saving to business of £5.4 million each year" so it seems clear they are planning to round down, not up.
In the pipeline: Red tape challenge
The government's "red tape challenge" focused from 3-26 October 2011 on 159 employment-related regulations, under four headings: taking people on, managing staff, letting people go, and compliance and enforcement. Its plans to merge, simplify or scrap 70 of those regulations were announced on 23 November 2011 and are summarised on the red tape challenge website at tinyurl.com/7nh4llr. Some are included in the government's dispute resolution proposals [above]. The other proposals include the following.
Recruitment. The government will consult in spring 2012 on streamlining the current regulatory regime in relation to the recruitment sector.
CRB checks. Criminal Records Bureau checks will be portable, so there will be no need for a fresh application when moving jobs. A universally portable CRB check will be created from early 2013, that can be viewed by employers instantly online. Work on this will be led by the Home Office. It sounds very like what was planned for 2010...
TUPE. In a call for evidence launched on 23 November 2011, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) asked for views on a series of questions about the effectiveness of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations and proposals to simplify them. Details are on the BIS website at tinyurl.com/8xs8zyp and the deadline is 31 January 2012. If the balance of evidence indicates that the regulations should be changed, there will be a consultation in 2012.
Whistleblowing. A loophole in whistleblowing law, which allows employees to blow the whistle about their own personal work contract, will be closed.
Minimum wage. 17 national minimum wage regulations will be merged into one set.
Dismissal. The government will launch a call for evidence on the implications of compensated no-fault dismissals for micro-firms with fewer than 10 employees, and on ways to slim down existing dismissal processes and how they might be simplified. This could potentially include working with ACAS to make changes to their code, or supplementary guidance for small businesses.
Micro-employers. At various times during the year (for example, in the plan for growth launched alongside the budget on 23 March 2011) the government has said there would be a three-year moratorium, starting 1 April 2011, on new regulation for businesses with fewer than 10 employees and start-up businesses. This is not going to happen, or at least not yet, and small employers should not be under the impression that new legislation will not apply to them. Similarly the media have occasionally given the impression that even current employment legislation will not apply to these micro-employers. This is not the case. The only current employment proposal that relates specifically to micro-employers is the one above, on the possibility of no-fault dismissals.
Redundancy. In another call for evidence launched on 23 November 2011 the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills asked for views on the effects of the 90-day consultation period where there will be more than 100 redundancies, and whether the period should be reduced to 60, 45 or 30 days. The call for evidence, which is likely to be followed by a consultation, is on the BIS website at tinyurl.com/8yq34fv and the deadline is 31 January 2012.
Tribunal fees. The Ministry of Justice published on 14 December 2011 a consultation on the introduction of fees for anyone wishing to take a claim to an employment tribunal. Currently there is no charge. The change is intended to bring the employment tribunal in line with other civil courts, and to encourage employees to settle disputes through mediation or conciliation.
There are two alternative options. In the first, all claims would involve payment of fees, with the fee depending on the nature of the claim. There are three suggested levels ranging from £150 to £250 for the issue of a claim and £250 to £1,250 if the claim goes to a hearing. Level 1 would cover claims for unpaid wages and redundancy payments, level 2 unfair dismissal, and level 3 discrimination and whistleblowing.
The second option would involve an issue fee of £200 to £600 with the maximum award limited to £30,000, or £1,750 where the claimant is seeking an award over £30,000.
If the first option is chosen, fees would be introduced in late 2013. The second option would require new primary legislation to set the cap on the maximum award, so would not be introduced until 2014.
For the employment appeal tribunal, an issue fee of £400 and hearing fee of £1,200 are proposed.
The government will waive fees for those who cannot afford to pay, and will continue to fund the costs of ACAS. The tribunal would be given the power to order the unsuccessful party to reimburse fees paid by the successful party.
The consultation documents are on the Ministry of Justice website via tinyurl.com/bqwo3hv. The deadline is 6 March 2012.
In the pipeline: Modern workplaces
The government consulted from 16 May to 8 August 2011 on its "modern workplaces" proposals on parental leave, flexible leave, equal pay audits, and changes to the working time regulations. The consultation documents are on the BIS website at tinyurl.com/896ojpt and the press release is at tinyurl.com/89kdkyh. The government's response is expected in early 2012.
Shared parental leave. Under proposals for a new system of shared parental leave which would not be in effect before 2015 mothers will be entitled to 18 weeks paid maternity leave around the time of the birth, to be taken in one block, and as at present fathers/partners will be entitled to two weeks ordinary paternity leave and pay at the time of the birth. In addition each parent will be entitled to four weeks paid leave, to be taken in the child's first year, and 30 weeks of additional parental leave will be available to either parent. Of these 30 weeks 17 will be paid. The 30 weeks can be broken into blocks between parents, and both parents could take the leave at the same time. However an employer could require an employee to take their leave in one continuous block, if agreement about the timing of the leave could not be reached. Employers would be able to ask staff to return for short periods to meet peaks in demand, or to require that leave is taken in one continuous block in order to meet business needs.
Under these proposals, the total time available for maternity/paternity leave would increase from 54 to 58 weeks.
Similar provisions would apply for same-sex couples and adopters.
Unpaid parental leave. At present, each parent is entitled to 13 weeks unpaid parental leave, to be taken before the child's fifth birthday, or 18 weeks until the child's 18th birthday if the child is disabled. It is proposed that this entitlement be extended to 18 weeks for all parents. This is expected to take effect from April 2012.
Antenatal appointments. The consultation includes a proposal giving fathers/partners the right to take unpaid leave to attend antenatal appointments.
Flexible leave. It is proposed that the right to request flexible working [see Flexible working to care for children] be extended to all employees who have been with their employer for 26 consecutive weeks, not just those who are parents or carers as at present. The current statutory procedure for flexible working requests would be replaced by a statutory code of practice for employers and a duty to consider requests reasonably, but there are no plans to alter the current eight business reasons for an employer to turn down a request.
At present employees can request flexible leave only once in a 12-month period. Under the proposals they would be able to make a further request within 12 months where the initial request was for a temporary arrangement.
Mandatory equal pay audit. An employment tribunal that has found an employer to have discriminated on the basis of gender in relation to pay will order the employer to conduct a pay audit and publish the results, except in specific circumstances such as where an audit has already been carried out in the past three years.
Working time regulations. The modern workplaces consultation also included proposals to amend the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) so that annual leave entitlements can be rescheduled, and carried over to the next leave year, when a worker falls ill during planned annual leave. This would be limited to the four weeks of Working Time Directive leave. The government also intends to amend the WTR to allow the carry-over of annual leave due to maternity, paternity, parental or adoption leave this will include the full 5.6 weeks of leave entitlement per year.
The consultation also sought views on giving businesses greater flexibility around annual leave, by allowing them to buy out untaken leave or to defer taking leave until the first six months of the following leave year where there are justifiable business grounds. These provisions would apply only to the 1.6 weeks of domestic statutory leave.
It is expected that these proposals will take effect from April 2012.
In the pipeline: Equality consultations
Third-party harassment. In its plan for growth launched on 23 March 2011 alongside the 2011 budget, the government said it would consult on removing the "unworkable" requirements in s.40 of the Equality Act 2010 for employers to take reasonable steps to prevent harassment of their staff by customers, clients and other third parties [see Equality Act part 5: Work].
Discrimination compensation. The government announced on 11 May 2011 that it would look in detail at concerns about the high level of compensation awarded by employment tribunals in some discrimination cases, and whether this leads some workers to take weak, speculative or vexatious cases in the hope of a large award and/or leads employers to settle such cases before they reach the tribunal. The press release from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is at tinyurl.com/85qboqk.
As far as I am aware nothing further has happened on either of these.
Go back to contents
INTERNSHIPS AND WORK PLACEMENTS
Updated 13/1/12. This information updates ss.25.6.1 & 26.4.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
With the recession and cuts, there has been increased interest in internships and increased confusion about whether and how much interns must be paid.
There is no statutory or common law definition of intern. Depending on the precise nature of a so-called internship, an intern may legally be:
-
a student on work experience or a work placement linked to their course;
-
a volunteer;
-
a 'worker' entitled to minimum wage, working time rights including paid holiday, and protection under the equality legislation; or
-
an employee entitled not only to workers' rights but also the full range of employment rights.
Unless interns are legally workers or employees, they are not entitled to minimum wage or working time rights, and may not be protected against discrimination.
The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development's Internships that work was published in December 2009 and covers how interns and employers can get the most out of internships, how much to pay interns, recruitment, induction, supervision and support, and how to structure short- and long-term internships. The guide is available via tinyurl.com/7txxnlk.
Drawing on the CIPD guide, the government's Common best practice code for high-quality internships was produced by CIPD and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and was launched in July 2011. The code was developed by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills' collaborative forum on fair access to the professions, and is intended to help organisations ensure fair, open and high-quality internships as a means of improving social mobility and enabling organisations to access wider talent pools. The code is on the BIS website via tinyurl.com/3tbjwep.
Similarly the CIPD's Work experience placements that work, published in June 2011 jointly with Jobcentre Plus, is intended to help employer raise the quality of work experience available to young job seekers. It is available via tinyurl.com/63kdx5x,
The TUC has a website on interns' rights and how they can be enforced, at www.rightsforinterns.org.uk.
The Arts Council England and Creative & Cultural Skills published Internships in the arts on 28 November 2011, providing advice on how to develop employment opportunities, and setting out the legal obligations for arts and cultural organisations offering internships. It is accessible via the press release at tinyurl.com/72f2nqp.
Some people on internships, work experience or work placements are clearly entitled to national minimum wage (NMW). Business Link published in September 2011 a checklist setting out when NMW must be paid for details see Minimum wage, internships and work placements.
The CIPD is calling for interns who are not entitled to NMW to receive a minimum training wage set at the same rate as the NMW for apprentices (£2.60 per hour from 1 October 2011). However the Trades Union Congress (TUC) is concerned that because internships are not defined in law, employers could use the training wage to avoid paying NMW.
Intern Aware is a campaign to promote fairer access to internships by ensuring that all interns are paid at least the national minimum wage. It is at www.internaware.org.
Internocracy, at www.internocracy.org, is a youth-led social enterprise campaigning for fair internships. It publishes guides for interns and organisations, and produces an "internship in a box", with templates and guidance to set up an internship programme.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about employment status (VSLH3 chapter 25)
Go to archived items about employment rights (VSLH3 chapter 26)
RIGHTS OF AGENCY TEMPS
Updated 13/1/12. This information updates s.26.4.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 October 2011, when the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 came into effect, agency workers (often referred to as temps) in England, Wales and Scotland who are placed on assignment by a temporary work agency (TWA) are entitled to the same basic employment rights as a comparable employee or worker (the comparator) directly employed by the receiving organisation (the hirer).
Comparators
To be a comparator, the directly employed employee or worker must be working for and under the supervision and direction of the same hirer as the agency worker; and the employee or worker must be engaged in the same or broadly similar work as the agency worker, taking into account, where relevant, whether they have a similar level of qualification and skills. The directly employed employee or worker and agency worker must both work or be based at the same workplace, but if there is no employee or worker meeting the above criteria at that workplace, the comparator can be an employee or worker meeting the criteria who is based at another of the hirer's workplaces.
A person whose employment has ceased cannot be a comparator.
If there is no comparator, there is no entitlement to agency worker rights except for the right to paid time off for ante-natal appointments and for pregnancy- and maternity-related adjustments. Agency workers are, of course, entitled to the statutory rights that all employees and workers have such as national minimum wage, working time rights, and rights to protection under the Equality Act.
Rights from Day 1
From Day 1 of starting an assignment by a temporary work agency, an agency worker must be granted the same access as a comparator to on-site collective facilities and amenities such as canteens, childcare facilities, showers, transport services, staff rooms and car parking. This access does not have to be provided if the hirer has objective justification for not doing so. Cost on its own is unlikely to be treated as sufficient justification.
Also from Day 1, the agency worker must must be given or have access to the same information about the employer's vacancies as a comparable directly employed employee or worker at the same location (but not at a different location) would be given or have access to, and must have the same opportunities to apply for permanent jobs.
Rights after 12 weeks
After a 12-week qualifying period in the same job with the same hirer, an agency worker is entitled to the same contractual rights as a comparator in relation to key elements of pay, including salary, overtime, shift allowances, annual leave pay, bonuses relating to the individual's performance or productivity, meal vouchers, duration of working time, night work, rest periods, breaks and annual leave. There are, however, a number of exceptions in relation to pay, including contractual sick pay and pension rights, as well as contractual maternity, paternity, adoption and redundancy pay.
All expectant and new mothers will benefit from increased protection after completing the 12 weeks' qualifying period, without there having to be a comparator. These are the right to paid time off for ante-natal appointments, and for classes and medical examinations if these are recommended by the woman's doctor; and the right to adjustments to working conditions and working hours if required for health and safety reasons. The agency worker must notify the agency of her pregnancy, and must also notify the hirer in writing. The hirer must carry out a risk assessment at any time during the pregnancy, with six months of the birth or if the mother is breastfeeding if it determines that one is necessary or if the agency asks the hirer to do so. If the hirer identifies a risk it must make an adjustment if it is reasonable to do so. If it is not possible for the hirer to adapt the work, the agency must offer suitable alternative work with another hirer if it is available, or pay the worker until the original assignment would have ended.
For agency workers on assignment on 1 October 2011, the 12-week period starts on that date. Work before 1 October is not counted towards the qualifying period.
Accrual of the 12-week qualifying period is 'paused' by a break of six weeks or less in the assignment, absence due to sickness or jury service (up to 28 weeks), annual leave, planned shutdowns such as factory closures or school holidays, or when the worker is unable to work because of industrial action. Accrual of the 12 weeks continues, without being paused, during absence related to pregnancy, childbirth or maternity, or during maternity, paternity or adoption leave. Accrual of the 12-week period is broken if there is a gap of more than six weeks in the assignment, or if a second assignment is significantly different from the first.
Liability
Both the agency and the hirer can be held liable for breach of the regulations. There is an exception for on-site facilities, where the hirer is solely liable.
The hirer should check that the agency has appropriate procedures in place to comply with the regulations, and to protect itself in case of a tribunal claim the hirer should keep records of how it determined comparable pay and conditions for its agency workers.
Further information
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has a detailed guide setting out definitions of temporary work agency, agency worker, comparator etc; the rights to which agency workers are entitled; criteria to be used when determining comparable pay and conditions; how the 12-week qualifying period is worked out and how breaks in work are dealt with, etc. It is at tinyurl.com/66uszcm.
Acas has a summary of the main points at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1873.
The Trades Union Congress's guide to the regulations is at www.tuc.org.uk/workplace/tuc-20092-f0.cfm.
Directgov has information intended for agency workers at tinyurl.com/3vczsvx.
The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/93/contents/made.
The Agency Workers (Amendment) Regulations 2011 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/1941/made.
The regulations implement the EU Agency Workers Directive (also called the Temporary Agency Workers Directive).
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about employment rights (VSLH3 chapter 26)
BEING CLEAR ABOUT OVERTIME PAY
Added 24/1/12. This information updates s.27.2.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
If an employee is or might be required to work overtime, the arrangements for the overtime and for overtime pay (if any) must be included in the statement of particulars required under the Employment Rights Act 1996. If the pay arrangements (or an alternative, such as time off in lieu) are not specified, a court may imply a "reasonable sum" for overtime pay into the contract.
In Driver v Air India, a case involving an airline catering services manager, Driver's contract said he could be required to work overtime, and said the details would be set out in notices and circulars. However such documents were never provided to Driver, nor were they produced in court when he brought claims against the company.
Driver had worked for Air India in Frankfurt from 1972 to 1997, and then at Heathrow. He regularly worked overtime, and was generally paid for this until December 2001. When overtime payments stopped in 2002, he raised a number of grievances about this and other issues, until leaving the company in January 2007. During that period a committee set up by Air India to investigate his claims and make recommendations found that Driver was a conscientious and effective worker who had saved the company money and that he did the overtime only when it was legitimately necessary (for example, to meet a landing plane on his day off), and recommended that he should be paid. However, the employer still failed to pay for the overtime.
Driver brought a claim in the high court, which found in favour of Air India and Driver appealed. One of Air India's arguments was that the overtime working had to be authorised in advance; the court of appeal said the contract as worded did not require this, and in any case the overtime working was essential rather than just a failure to fit the required work into the contractual hours, and in many cases his overtime pay claims had been signed by his manager. The court also noted that Air India had paid for overtime in the past, and even when responding to Driver's grievances had never said he did not have a right to overtime pay. The court of appeal, finding in favour of Driver, awarded him more than £77,000 overtime pay, plus interest.
The court of appeal decision in Driver v Air India is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/830.html.
This was a complex case, with a number of very specific circumstances, so everyone who thinks they are owed overtime pay shouldn't get too excited. However, the case does appear to indicate that even where a contract does not specify the amount of overtime pay, there may be an implied entitlement to such pay if the contract says that overtime working is or might be required; the contract does not state that overtime working must be authorised in advance (or, if it does say this, the overtime working has been authorised as required); the overtime is necessary for specific ad hoc tasks rather than just because there is too much work to do within the normal working hours; the overtime is recorded at the time it is taken and overtime pay is claimed promptly; and the claim is not explicitly rejected by the employer.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content. Go back to contents
Go to archived items about VSLH3 model contract of employment (VSLH3 chapter 27)
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
RIGHT TO WORK IN THE UK
Updated 30/1/11. This information updates s.29.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Some of this item is out of date. It will be updated early in 2012.
Rules on people from outside the European Economic Area (EU + Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) and Switzerland working in the UK continue to be tightened. The main rules affecting voluntary organisations as employers are set out below.
Checking right to work
Under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, it is no longer enough for the employer simply to check and keep a copy of an employee's passport or other relevant documents at the beginning of employment. If a person who is hired on or after 29 February 2008 has limited leave to remain in the UK, the checks have to be repeated every 12 months. In addition, employers have to take action if they become aware at any stage that a person is working illegally. An employer can be fined £10,000 for each person found to be working illegally, unless they can show that they saw and kept a copy of the relevant documentation. An employer who knowingly hires someone who is not entitled to work in the UK could be subject to an unlimited fine and prison sentence of up to two years. The initial checks must be done before the person is employed, and to avoid allegations of racial discrimination should be carried out for all potential employees.
From 22 January 2011 an ID card issued under the Identity Cards Act 2006 is no longer acceptable as proof of identity. The Identity Documents Act 2010, which repealed the Identity Cards Act, is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/40/contents/enacted.
But since 2 August 2010 an expired passport with indefinite leave to remain (also known as permanent residency) can be accepted by employers as evidence of the right to work in the UK. Certificates of the right of abode continue to be acceptable as evidence of the right to work only if they are in a current passport.
Updated guidance on checking the right to work, including illustrations of relevant documents, was published in November 2010 is available via tinyurl.com/5pr25w. Guidance specifically on checking the right to work of refugees, asylum seekers and people with humanitarian protection was published in August 2010 and is available via tinyurl.com/3635h2m
Points-based system
Also under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, the right to enter or remain in Britain is now based on a five-tier points system similar to Australia. Any employer who wants to hire or continue to hire a migrant worker (any worker who is not from the EEA or Switzerland) in tier 2 or in most tier 5 categories has to register first with the UK Border Agency as a licensed sponsor. Registration as a sponsor is also required before any existing migrant worker's work permit in these tiers can be changed, extended or renewed.
After registering, the sponsor then provides a certificate of sponsorship which enables the worker to apply to enter or remain in the UK. This decision as to whether the worker is admitted depends on the number of points the worker has. Points are based on the worker's skills (including aptitude, experience and age), the need for those skills in the UK economy, proficiency in English, prospective earnings, and funds available for maintenance.
Sponsors are responsible for workers they sponsor and must, amongst other things, inform the Border Agency if the worker does not turn up for the job, or is absent from work without consent for more than 10 days. Detailed HR systems must be in place to monitor all sponsored workers.
The five tiers are:
-
Tier 1 for highly skilled individuals such as scientists started operating in early 2008. Applicants for admission to the UK or the right to remain in the UK under tier 1 do not need a job offer before they apply, and their permission to work is not linked to a particular job or type of work. The government announced on 21 December 2010 that from 23 December 2010 it would not accept any more tier 1 (general) applications made from overseas. Applications for this category from within the UK would not be accepted after 5 April 2011, although some applicants already in the UK may be able to apply later under transitional arrangements. Employers who have hired under tier 1 may need in future to become registered as a sponsor and employ under tier 2 [see below].
Changes will be made to the tier 1 entrepreneur and investor categories, and a small number of tier 1 (exceptional talent) visas will be introduced for people who have won recognition in scientific and cultural fields.
-
Tier 2 is for skilled individuals such as teachers, social workers and nurses. It came into effect in November 2008. This is the tier most likely to affect voluntary organisations. Any organisation which wants to hire a skilled worker from outside the EEA or Switzerland, or who will want to extend existing workers whose work permit ends, must register far enough in advance to ensure their sponsorship application can be processed in time for them to issue the worker with the necessary certificate of sponsorship. An interim limit on the number of certificates that will be issued runs from 23 December 2011 to 5 April 2011, and annual caps will then be introduced.
Unless the occupation is on the government's list of shortage occupations, the employer can issue a certificate of sponsorship only if it has conducted a resident labour market test. This means the employer has advertised at JobCentre Plus and in at least one other specified medium and could not fill the post from within the UK, EEA or Switzerland. The advertising period is four weeks for all jobs, but the weeks do not have to run continuously. This means it is possible to advertise for two weeks, and if there is no suitable resident worker, then advertise for a further two weeks.
The government has proposed that from April 2011 all tier 2 occupations should be at graduate level.
Tier 2 also covers intra-company transfers, sports people, ministers of religion and some other religious workers, for whom different rules apply. The rules on intra-company transfers were changed on 6 April 2010 and the government is planning to increase to £40,000, from April 2011, the minimum salary required for transfers coming to the UK for more than 12 months.
-
Tier 5 for temporary workers and youth mobility schemes also came into effect in November 2008. The provisions for temporary workers cover creative and sporting workers coming to the UK for up to 12 months, charity workers coming to the UK to do unpaid voluntary work for a charity for up to 12 months, religious workers who do not meet the criteria for entry under tier 2, workers on government authorised exchange schemes, and employees of overseas governments and international organisations.
Temporary workers must have a licensed sponsor. For those on exchange schemes, the sponsor is the body which manages the scheme, rather than the individual employer. Youth mobility schemes are for young people aged 18-31 from Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, coming to the UK for up to 24 months. The individual's national government is the sponsor.
-
Tier 4 is for students who are not from the European Economic Area or Switzerland, and came into effect in March 2009. Their university or college must be registered as a sponsor. The rules for sponsors and migrant students were changed from 6 April 2010, including creation of a new "highly trusted sponsor" scheme.
A consultation took place from 7 December 2010 to 31 January 2011 on significantly reducing the number of students who can come to the UK.
-
Tier 3 is a limited quota system for low-skilled workers to fill temporary shortages in specific industries. It is brought into effect only when needed, and is not in effect at present.
Guidance for sponsors
Information about the points-based system and sponsorship is available from the UK Border Agency at www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/employers/points.
Short-term visitors
New rules were introduced from November 2008 for a range of visas for short-term (up to six months) visitors to the UK, covering business visitors (coming to attend conferences or carry out specific work-related activities); sports visitors for specific events; entertainer visitors to take part in certain events (including charity shows); and student visitors for students on short courses.
Workers registration scheme for workers from eastern Europe
Since 1 May 2004 nationals of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia have had the right to work in the UK. The employer has to carry out a check (as above) to show they are a national of the country. If they are from an A8 state (any of the countries other than Cyprus and Malta), the employer should advise them to register immediately with the Home Office's workers registration scheme. This requirement was expected to end on 30 April 2009, but was extended to 30 April 2011.
The employer must check within one month of the person starting work that they have registered with the scheme, and the worker must remain registered until they have completed 12 months' work. A copy of the employee's registration certificate will be sent to the employer and should be kept. It is an offence for an employer not to comply with these rules, with a fine of up to £5,000.
Stricter rules, based on the old work permit system, apply to workers from Bulgaria and Romania.
Sources of information
Information about all aspects of immigration is available from the UK Border Agency (formerly Immigration and Nationality Directorate, and then Borders and Immigration Agency) at www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/business-sponsors/ and its employers' helpline on 0845 010 6677.
The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/20060013.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH3 chapter 29)
TUPE CASES AND GUIDANCE
Added 16/4/09. This information is included in s.29.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Some of this item is out of date. It will be updated early in 2012.
The Information Commissioner's Office issued in June 2008 guidance on the data protection implications of a transferring employer's obligation to provide information about employees to the transferee (the receiving employer) in a transfer under the TUPE regulations the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. For information about the obligation to provide this employee liability information, see www.sandy-a.co.uk/vslh/29recruitment.htm#tupe.
The ICO's guidance emphasises that the TUPE obligation to provide details of employees' identity, age, remuneration, and any disciplinary or legal action in the two years before the transfer overrides the data protection requirement not to disclose such information. All disclosed information must be accurate, up to date and secure, and the transferee must use the information only for the purpose of TUPE, for example assessing potential liabilities linked to the transfer. Information which is not required under the TUPE regulations should, if it is required for other purposes, be anonymised if possible.
The ICO's Disclosure of employee information under TUPE can be accessed via tinyurl.com/4en9nr.
On a separate TUPE matter: since 2006 there has been uncertainty about situations where a transferee is bound by a collective agreement negotiated between the transferor and a trade union, and a pay increase is negotiated by the transferor and union after the transfer has taken place. The employment appeal tribunal held in Whent v Cartledge in 1996 that the transferee is bound by the pay increase, even though the transferee was not a party to the negotiations. This changed in 2006 when the European Court of Justice ruled that the acquired rights directive does not apply to contractual changes agreed after the transfer.
But in February 2009 the employment appeal tribunal ruled that the UK can interpret the acquired rights directive in a way that is more favourable to employees. This decision, in Alemo-Herron & others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd, is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0456_08_1201.html. The decision is being appealed, but in the meantime any employer which has taken on employees covered under a collective agreement with their previous employer or is considering taking on such employees should take legal advice about the potential implications.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content. Go back to contents
Go to archived items about recruitment (VSLH3 chapter 29)
MINIMUM WAGE
Updated 23/9/11. This information updates s.30.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 October 2011 the national minimum wage went up from £5.93 per hour to £6.08 for workers aged 21 and over, from £4.92 to £4.98 for 18-20 year olds, and from £3.64 to £3.68 for 16 and 17 year olds who are above school leaving age and are not apprentices.
The accommodation offset rate (the amount that can be taken into account for living accommodation) was increased from £4.61 per day (£32.27 per week) to £4.73 per day (£33.11 per week). From 1 October 2011, the accommodation offset does not apply to students in full-time higher education and further education who are employed by the institution at which they are students.
The apprentice minimum wage of £2.50 per hour went up to £2.60 for apprentices aged under 19, or over 19 and in the first year of their apprenticeship. This applies to apprentices on traditional contracts of apprenticeship, and employed apprentices on government-supported level 2 and 3 schemes. The apprentice minimum wage came into effect on 1 October 2010, replacing the £95 per week minimum rate of pay for apprentices.
Information for employees and employers about all aspects of minimum wage, including an interactive website for workers and employers to find out how the minimum wage applies to them, is available from Business Link via tinyurl.com/6wjjqvv. Information is also available from HM Revenue & Customs at www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/payroll/day-to-day/nmw.htm, and from the pay and work rights helpline at 0800 917 2368, covering minimum wage, working time rights and agency workers' rights.
The National Minimum Wage Act 1998, setting out the basic legislation, is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/39/contents.
The National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Regulations 2011 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/2345/made,
and the National Minimum Wage (Amendment)(No.2) Regulations 2011 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/2347/made.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
MINIMUM WAGE, INTERNSHIPS AND WORK EXPERIENCE
Added 13/1/12. This information updates s.30.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In response to increasing concern about the role and status of interns, Business Link and Directgov updated their guidance in September 2011 on how national minimum wage (NMW) applies to people on internships, placements or work experience. The guidance does not try to explain the legal differences between these categories, because there are no general statutory definitions of the terms. Instead the guidance emphasises that NMW depends on the relationship between the organisation and individual, not on what that relationship is called.
The Business Link guidance, intended for employers, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/6vubqhb. Information intended for individuals is on the Directgov website via tinyurl.com/5sywyu6.
A very helpful Business Link checklist at tinyurl.com/7kzzulz sets out the criteria which, if met, require the employer or organisation to pay minimum wage even if the worker is called an intern or is on a placement or work experience.
Separate guidance on "unpaid workers" and volunteers, and voluntary workers as defined under the National Minimum Wage Age 1998, is at tinyurl.com/7qnlyly.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
MINIMUM WAGE AND ON-CALL TIME
Added 13/1/12. This information updates s.30.2.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Where a worker is provided with living accommodation or sleeping facilities at or near work and is required to be available all or some time on call or standby, there is a statutory right under the National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (NMWR) to be paid at least minimum wage for the hours the person is "awake for the purpose of working". This has been interpreted as meaning the person is actually working, or is required to be on call or standby and is awake. Minimum wage is not payable when the worker is sleeping.
This is different from the Working Time Regulations (WTR), under which time when a worker is required to be at a place of work specified by the employer is working time, even if they are sleeping or doing something other than carrying out their duties. This includes sleep-in staff and others who have to be on or in the near vicinity of the employer’s premises even when not working, and workers who are provided with living accommodation in order to be on call. This interpretation of the WTR was confirmed by the European court of justice in Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger in 2003.
In a recent case, two housekeepers working in sheltered accommodation were required to be on the premises and on call overnight, on different nights, in addition to their basic working hours. Each was provided with private accommodation for her overnight time.
Both brought claims on the basis that they were at work while on call, and were therefore entitled to be paid at least the minimum wage for all the hours. The employment tribunal said that because all the time they were on the premises counted as working time under the WTR, they were entitled to be paid for it.
The employer appealed, and the employment appeal tribunal confirmed that regardless of the WTR definition of working time, under the NMWR minimum wage is payable only for the time the worker is awake and working. The case was remitted to the employment tribunal to consider how long the housekeepers spent awake for the purpose of working, and how much pay they were therefore due.
The EAT decision in South Manchester Abbeyfield Society Ltd v Hopkins and Wordsworth is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2010/0079_10_3011.html.
The ET made a similar initial interpretation in Wray v JW Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd, conflating working time under the WTR with "awake for the purpose of working" under the NMWR. In this case a publican had to live above the pub but did not have to be there outside her normal working hours when she was awake. She did, however, have to sleep there in order to provide minimum security, but did not have any duties during sleeping time apart from notifying the emergency services if necessary. The EAT found that the requirement to live and sleep above the pub did not entitle her to minimum wage for time she was not working.
This decision is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2011/0102_11_1407.html.
Similarly in Baxter v Titan Aviation Ltd, a driver who was required to stay overnight at a hotel or B&B before taking holidaymakers to their destination was held not to be entitled to minimum wage for the overnight time. The EAT decision in this case is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2011/0355_10_3008.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
EARNINGS FROM PERMITTED WORK
Updated 2/1/12. This information updates s.30.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 October 2011, workers who are receiving incapacity benefit or employment and support allowance (ESA) can earn up to £97.50 per week for permitted work, without it affecting their benefit, for up to one year or for more than a year if it is supported permitted work.
Summaries of the permitted work and supported permitted work rules for ESA claimants are on the direct.gov.uk website via tinyurl.com/6tndv6o, and for incapacity benefit claimants via tinyurl.com/68uwnlq.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
REAL TIME PAYE INFORMATION
Added 18/1/12. This information updates s.30.4.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Starting between April and October 2013 all employers will need to provide online "real time information" to HMRC about tax, national insurance contributions and other deductions from wages before or at the time the payments are made, instead of waiting and sending in the information after the end of the tax year on forms P14 and P35.
According to HMRC, the intention of the change is to make the PAYE process simpler and less burdensome for employers and HMRC; make PAYE more accurate for individuals, thus reducing over time the number of bills and repayments sent after the end of the tax year; enable HMRC to pursue late payments more effectively; support the payment of universal credits; and reduce tax credits errors and fraud.
The new arrangements will be piloted with selected software designers, employers and pension providers during 2012-13.
In the meantime, information about the changes and how they will affect the operation of PAYE is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/rti/employerfaqs.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
TAX ALLOWANCES AND NATIONAL INSURANCE THRESHOLDS
Updated 18/1/12. This information updates ss.30.4.4 and 30.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2012 the basic personal allowance for under-65s goes up from £7,475 (£144 per week) to £8,105 (£156 per week). Basic rate tax remains 20%, higher rate 40% and additional rate 50%, but the threshold at which higher rate becomes payable is reduced from £35,000 to £34,370. The threshold for additional rate remains £150,000.
From 6 April 2012 the national insurance lower earnings limit (the lowest level of earnings that can count towards entitlement to statutory sick pay and statutory maternity, paternity and adoption pay) is increased from £102 to £107 per week.
The starting point for employee's national insurance contributions (the primary threshold) goes up from £139 to £146 per week, and the upper earnings limit remains £817 per week. Employee's NICs remain 12% between the primary threshold and upper earnings limit, with the additional NIC
on earnings above the upper earnings limit remaining at 2%. Employer's NICs remain 13.8% on earnings above the secondary threshold (increased from £136 per week to £144) and on class 1A and 1B NICs.
Rates and thresholds for 2010-11, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 are at www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
NATIONAL INSURANCE HOLIDAY
Updated 18/1/12. This information updates s.30.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Since 6 September 2010 new businesses set up outside Greater London, the South East and the East of England have been entitled to a holiday on employer's national insurance contributions for the first 10 employees hired during the business's first year of operation. The NICs holiday will last for the earlier of the employee's first 52 weeks of employment or until 5 September 2013, when the scheme ends. For each of the 10 employees, a holiday of up to £5,000 is allowed.
Businesses set up between 22 June 2010 and 6 September 2010 are also eligible, provided they meet the criteria.
Start-up charities which have a business element (charging for goods or services, rather than being funded through grants or donations) are eligible for the holiday. An amendment to the bill that would have made charities eligible even without a business element was not accepted.
The holiday is not automatic; an employer who wants to claim must apply to HMRC. Information about the scheme, eligibility and how to apply is available from HMRC via tinyurl.com/3yrqguk.
On 12 October 2011, David Cameron told the House of Commons that only 7,000 small businesses had taken part in the initiative, despite the government predicting that 400,000 would do so.
The National Insurance Contributions Act 2011, which set up the scheme, is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/3/contents.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
ABOLITION OF CYCLE TO WORK DAY BREAKFASTS AND OTHER TAX RELIEFS
Added 18/1/12. This information updates s.30.4.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Following a consultation from May to August 2011, the draft Finance Act 2012 includes provisions to abolish a number of tax reliefs that are obsolete or considered unnecessary. Those which could affect voluntary sector employees and employers include:
-
from 6 April 2012, repeal of the exemption from class 1 national insurance contributions (NICs) for some students and apprentices who are not from the EEA or certain non-EEA countries.
-
from 6 April 2013, the first 15p of the value of luncheon vouchers will no longer be exempt from tax and class 1A NICs, so tax and NICs will have to be paid on the full amount;
-
from 6 April 2013, employees taking part in a cycle to work day organised by their employer will no longer be entitled to a tax-free breakfast or other meal supplied by the employer, a provision introduced in the "green budget" in 2002 which sought to encourage cycling;
-
from 6 April 2015, repeal of tax relief (maximum £12.50 per year) on life assurance premiums paid by an employer under an employer-financed retirement benefit scheme (EFRBS) on a policy issued on or before 13 March 1984, in respect of an individual employed before that date who continues to be employed by the same employer.
The reasons for the abolition of the tax reliefs, the details of exactly who is affected and in what way are in an overview of the draft legislation published by HMRC and HM Treasury on 6 December 2011, available via tinyurl.com/84qjwqy. Details of the above changes are on pp.A261, A221, A269 and A257.
The government decided, for exceptional reasons, not to include in the Finance Act the proposed abolition of the exemption from tax and NICs on employees' late-night taxi journeys. The fact that the final weeks of the consultation took place during August 2011 may have had something to do with this.
Beware: some of the section headings in the Finance Act overview look very alarming, but aren't. For example the repeal of the exemption from class 1A NICs for prescribed general earnings turns out to apply only to relocation expenses incurred before April 1998.
Many of the other reliefs that are being abolished relate to property transactions and transactions in shares, as well as harbour reorganisation schemes, Angostura bitters and black beer a very strange collection.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
TAX & NICs ON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Added 18/1/12. This information updates s.30.4.10 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Employees' and volunteers' use of their private vehicles to carry out an organisation's work is called business use, even if the organisation is not a business. The approved mileage allowance payment (AMAP) is the maximum which can be reimbursed for employees' use of their own vehicles free of tax and national insurance and without having to be included on end-of-year forms P11D or P9D for employees and others paid under the PAYE system, or on self-assessment for workers not on PAYE.
Having been kept at the same rate since 2002, the AMAPs for cars and vans finally went up, from 6 April 2011, from 40p to 45p per mile for the first 10,000 miles of reimbursed business use. The AMAP remains 25p for each additional business mile. It also remains at the 2002 rate for motorcycles (24p per mile) and for bicycles (20p per mile). Reimbursement at above the AMAP rates is subject to tax and class 1 national insurance.
An organisation can pay less than the AMAP, or nothing at all. In these situations the employee or volunteer may then be able to claim tax relief, called mileage allowance relief (MAR), on the amount which has not been reimbursed.
Until 5 April 2011, an organisation which reimbursed employees for business use of their cars could choose to pay the driver an additional 5p per mile passenger payment for each employee of the same employer who travelled as a passenger in the car on a business journey. This additional amount is paid to the driver and is free of tax and national insurance.
From 6 April 2011, this passenger payment allowance was extended to volunteers. The only reference to this I can find on the HMRC website is a tax information and impact note (TIIN) dated 23 March 2011, at www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2011/tiin6310.pdf. This does not make clear whether the change applies only to volunteer drivers carrying volunteer passengers, or also applies to volunteer drivers carrying employee passengers or employee drivers carrying volunteer passengers. The TIIN says the extension of the allowance to volunteers "will not require legislation and will be covered in updated HMRC guidance". This guidance does not yet exist, but when it does it will be in
www.hmrc.gov.uk/mileage/volunteer-drivers.htm,
www.hmrc.gov.uk/guidance/480_chapter16.pdf, and
www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/exb/a-z/m/mileage-expenses.htm.
In a tax tribunal decision in August 2011, it was held that lump sum mileage reimbursements are "relevant motoring expenditure" for the purposes of national insurance contributions only to the extent that the lump sums cover actual expenditure on business motoring. Any organisation which pays lump sums to cover motoring expenses should take advice about how it is affected by the decision in Total People Limited v HM Revenue and Customs is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2010/TC00661.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
TAX TREATMENT OF EMPLOYER-SUPPORTED CHILDCARE AND VOUCHERS
Updated 18/1/12. This information updates s.30.4.12 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2011 there are changes to the tax treatment of childcare vouchers and directly contracted childcare provided by employers. Any employer who provides such benefits should consult the HM Revenue & Customs guidance to determine when an employee "joins" the scheme, and when a basic earnings assessment has to be carried out for the employee.
The changes were intended to ensure all employees, regardless of whether they are on basic, higher or additional rate tax, receive the same amount of tax relief. Employees who were in an employer-supported childcare scheme on or before 5 April 2011 are not affected by the changes, so higher and additional rate taxpayers already in a scheme on that date continue to receive proportionately more tax relief than basic rate taxpayers.
HMRC guidance for employers and for employees/parents is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/thelibrary/employer-qa.htm.
A summary of the rules for employers, updated in September 2011, is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/helpsheets/e18.pdf.
Details and the benchmark rates are at www.hmrc.gov.uk/employers/emp-income-scale-rates.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pay (VSLH3 chapter 30)
STATE PENSIONS
Updated 24/1/12. This information updates s.30.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Information about state pensions is available at www.direct.gov.uk for employees (including a state pension age calculator) and www.businesslink.gov.uk for employers.
Major changes to state pensions, in particular increasing the state pension age, were set out in the Pensions Act 2007, most of which came into effect in April 2010. An accelerated timetable for increasing the state pension age from 65 to 68, announced by the government in October 2010, was set out in the Pensions Act 2011, with further changes announced in November 2011. The Pensions Act 2007 is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/22/contents.
The 2011 Act is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/19/contents,
For men born before 6 December 1953, the current state pension age is 65. For women born between 6 April 1950 and 5 December 1953, the state pension age is being increased from 60 to 65 between 6 May 2010 and 6 November 2018, to bring it in line with the pension age for men. The finishing date was originally October 2020, which would have given a pension age of 65 to women born up to October 1955.
The pension age for both men and women was then supposed to increase from 65 to 66 between 2024 and 2026. But under the Pensions Act 2011 changes, this increase will take place from 6 March 2019 to 6 September 2020, affecting men and women born between 6 December 1953 and 5 October 1954. For those born after 5 October 1954, the state pension age will be 66 until it starts increasing to 67.
The increase from 66 to 67 was supposed to take place between 6 May 2034 and 6 March 2036, affecting people born between 6 April 1968 and 5 April 1969, but the government announced on 29 November 2011 that this would now happen eight years earlier, from 2026 to 2028. This has not yet been approved by Parliament, so the dates are not yet definite. If the change is approved, people born between 6 April 1960 and 5 April 1961 will reach state pension age between 66 and 67, and those born on or after 6 April 1961 will have a state pension age of 67.
The increase in state pension age from 67 to 68 is still supposed to take place from 2044 to 2046. which will affect anyone born on or after 6 April 1977. If it is brought forward, as it no doubt will be, it will affect people born earlier than 6 April 1977.
Under the Pensions Act 2007, a number of significant pension changes were brought in from 6 April 2010. These included:
-
the number of years' contributions needed for a full basic state pension was reduced to 30 (for people reaching pension age before 6 April 2010 it was 39 for women and 44 for men);
-
weekly credits were introduced for carers, enabling them to build up entitlement to a state pension;
-
the rules which entitle married women in some circumstances to increase their state pension based on their spouse's contributions were extended to married men and civil partners.
Since 6 April 2009, people who reach(ed) state pension age between 6 April 2008 and 5 April 2015 and who already have at least 20 qualifying years on their national insurance record, are able to pay class 3 national insurance contributions for an additional six qualifying years (in addition to the six years which can already be paid for). This provision is intended primarily for women and carers who have had substantial periods when they were not working and did not make (or were not credited with) NI payments. Information about class 3 NI contributions is available via tinyurl.com/ybjfc94.
Under the Pensions Act 2007, from around 2030 the state second pension (also called additional state pension), which tops up the basic state pension, will become flat-rate.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH3 chapter 30)
AUTO-ENROLMENT AND THE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS TRUST
Updated 29/1/12. This information significantly changes s.30.6.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In a phased roll-out starting on 1 October 2012, the Pensions Act 2008 and subsequent changes brought in by the Pensions Act 2011 will require every "jobholder" aged between 22 and state pension age who earns more than a minimum threshold and is not in an employer's qualifying pension scheme to be automatically enrolled (auto-enrolled) in the national employment savings trust (NEST) unless they opt out. A jobholder is anyone working in Great Britain under a contract, including a temporary contract. The minimum threshold was announced in 2011 as £7,475, but there have also been announcements that it would be the same as the income tax threshold, in which case it would be £8,105 in 2012-13.
Jobholders with earnings less than the threshold or aged 16-21 or above state pension age will be able to opt in to the scheme.
NEST will be a defined contribution occupational pension scheme. It was formerly going to be called the national pensions savings scheme and each member would have a personal account, but these terms were dropped. NEST replaced the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority, which was wound up in July 2010.
The employers' duty to auto-enrol workers in NEST or another qualifying scheme will be based on staging dates from 1 October 2012 until October 2016, depending on the number of workers in the employer's largest PAYE scheme as at 1 April 2012. For employers with 120,000 or more workers in their PAYE scheme the staging date will be 1 October 2012, and 1 November 2012 for employers with 50,000 to 119,999 workers. It is proposed that these employers will be allowed to start enrolling from July 2012 if they wish to do so.
As announced by the Department for Work and Pensions on 25 January 2012, enrolment will then be introduced in the following monthly staging dates, although those for employers with fewer than 250 employers are still subject to consultation and parliamentary approval. Employers will be able to choose to join the scheme earlier than their staging date if certain conditions are met. The staging dates are on the Pensions Regulator's website at www.tpr.gov.uk/staging. (As of 28 January the dates for employers with fewer than 3000 workers are not yet there, but the DWP press release setting them out is at tinyurl.com/86qj4z3.)
-
119,999 down to 3,000 members (workers in the PAYE scheme as at 1 April 2012): 1 December 2012 to 1 July 2013
-
2,999 down to 250 members: 1 August 2013 to 1 February 2014
-
249 down to 50 members: 1 April 2014 to 1 April 2015
-
test tranche for fewer than 30 members: 1 June 2015 to 30 June 2015
-
49 down to 30 members: 1 August 2015 to 1 October 2015
-
Fewer than 30 members: 1 January 2016 to 1 April 2017
-
Employers without PAYE schemes: 1 April 2017
-
New employers from April 2012 to September 2017: 1 May 2017 to 1 February 2018
-
New employers October 2017 onwards: immediate.
The Pensions Regulator will send employers full information 18, 12 and six months before their staging date.
For workers employed after their employer has joined the scheme, there will be an optional three-month waiting period during which the employer does not have to enrol the worker. The worker can choose to be enrolled during this period, if they wish.
Statutory minimum contributions to NEST or a qualifying scheme will be phased in, with the employer (for workers above the auto-enrolment threshold) and worker each paying at least 1% of the worker's salary between the national insurance primary and upper thresholds (£7,952 and £42,484 in 2012-13) in phase 1 (from the staging date or earlier if the employer starts auto-enrolling earlier, until October 2016). In phase 2, from October 2016 to September 2017, the employer will pay 2% and the worker 3%; and in phase 3, from October 2017, the employer will pay 3% and the worker 5%. In addition, 1% tax relief will also be paid into the scheme for the worker. There will be an annual contribution limit of £4,300 (in 2011 terms) but this cap is likely to be removed in 2017.
Basic information leaflets for employers, as well as interactive tools that provide the relevant staging date (where it is known), an overview of employer duties, the process of enrolling workers, and what the minimum employer contribution will be for each person who must be automatically enrolled, are at www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/pensions-reform.aspx. Detailed information is in the section for professionals.
TLT Solicitors have a straightforward briefing at www.tltesource.co.uk/content.aspx?id=1037.
Organisations which already provide an occupational pension scheme (sometimes called company pension) need to find out whether it is a qualifying scheme, and if not, they will need to consider how it might need to be changed to be a qualifying scheme, whether it is the best way to meet the organisation's obligation to enroll its workers in NEST or a qualifying scheme, and what the implications are in relation to employees who may not have joined the scheme by the time they have to be enrolled in it.
For all organisations, advice may be needed on contractual issues, such as whether other employee benefits will need to be reduced in order to cover the costs of the organisation's pension contributions, or whether employees start demanding higher pay to cover the cost of their contributions.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH3 chapter 30)
CONTRACTING OUT OF ADDITIONAL STATE PENSION
Added 24/1/12. This information updates s.30.5.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 6 April 2012, some employees who are a members of an employer's defined contribution (money purchase) occupational pension scheme or have a stakeholder pension or personal pension, and have "contracted out" of the additional state pension will not be able to remain contracted out. Employees to whom this applies will, from that date, be automatically brought back into the additional state pension and will begin to build up this pension. The additional state pension is also called state second pension (S2P).
Directgov has a good summary on contracting out and the changes which can be accessed via tinyurl.com/77hdw8w. A more detailed six-page briefing from HM Revenue & Customs and the Department for Work and Pensions is at tinyurl.com/6qafjv9. TLT solicitors have a briefing for employers with defined contribution schemes at tinyurl.com/87wxvv7.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH3 chapter 30)
PENSION LIABILITY ON INCORPORATION, MERGER OR WINDING UP
Updated 2/4/10. This information updates s.30.6.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
As defined under the Pensions Act 1995 s.75 and the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt on Withdrawal) Regulations 2005, a cessation event includes, for example, an incorporation where the assets and liabilities of an unincorporated organisation are transferred to the new incorporated body, a merger where all or part of organisation's undertakings are transferred to an existing or new organisation such that the original organisation no longer has any members in the pension scheme, winding up an organisation, withdrawing from the pension scheme, or reaching a point where the organisation has no more active members in the scheme and no eligible employees to whom membership can be offered.
Under the 2005 regulations, when a cessation event occurs the organisation's withdrawal debt crystallises, which means the organisation could potentially become immediately liable for the full cost of pensions for its employees who are entitled to draw pensions now or in future, if these have not yet been fully covered by contributions to the pension scheme. And because of legal changes in the way the debt must be calculated, the debt is likely to be significant. But it is important to emphasise that the debt does not become payable unless there is a cessation event.
The Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008, which came into effect on 6 April 2008, eased some of the requirements when an organisation which is a member of a multi-employer defined benefit or final salary pension scheme has a cessation event. Under these regulations:
-
Where the cessation event is that there are no more members in the scheme, there is a 12-month grace period during which time the employer will presumably try to get at least one employee to join.
-
For other cessation events the pension provider and employer can agree a withdrawal arrangement under which the employer pays a specified amount based on how much has already been paid into the scheme. The employer puts in place a guarantor, agreed by the pension provider, who will if required pay the remainder of the potential debt.
-
In an arrangement specifically intended for "ongoing organisations with low levels of liquidity such as charities", the Pensions Regulator can agree with the pension provider an approved withdrawal arrangement, under which the employer can pay a lower amount. Where the cessation event is a winding up to incorporate or merge, the guarantor will presumably be the new incorporated or merged organisation.
Since 6 April 2010 the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2010 make it easier for two organisations which are associated with each other and are members of the same multi-employer defined benefit or final salary pension scheme to restructure, without triggering a cessation event. Strict procedural rules, set out in the regulations, must be followed, so both organisations should take advice at a very early stage from their legal advisors and pension providers.
The 2010 regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100725_en_1.
The 2008 regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20080731_en_1.
The Charity Commission has some guidance in its Defined benefit pension schemes and recent changes to pension legislation briefing (updated in June 2010) at tinyurl.com/ygysm8r.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about pensions (VSLH3 chapter 30)
ON-CALL TIME AS WORKING TIME
Updated 2/4/10. This information is included in s.31.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
After years of uncertainty about what constitutes on-call time for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the European Court of Justice eventually confirmed in 2003 that on-call time includes time when a worker is required to be at or near a place of work specified by the employer, even if they are sleeping or doing something other than working. If they are not required to be at a place of work, working time includes only the time they are actually working.
In 2008 discussions took place within the EU about whether the EU working time directive, on which the working time regulations are based, should be amended so that on-call time would be divided into active (when carrying out work for the employer) and inactive, with inactive on-call time not counting as working hours. This proposal was not agreed.
For the purposes of minimum wage the rules are different, and time when on call but sleeping is not working time for minimum wage, unless their contract says they will be paid for the whole time while on call.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about working time (VSLH3 chapter 31)
HOLIDAY PAY AND LONG-TERM SICKNESS
Updated 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.4.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The European Court of Justice ruled in Stringer v HM Revenue & Customs on 20 January 2009 that annual leave entitlement under the working time directive accrues during sick leave, and even if a worker is absent for a full leave year, they are entitled to four weeks' paid annual leave during that year. The ECJ decision is limited to the four weeks' leave entitlement under the EU working time directive, and does not cover the additional 1.6 weeks statutory entitlement in the UK (see statutory annual leave) or contractual holiday pay.
The ECJ also ruled that a worker who ceases to be employed while on sick leave and has not taken their four weeks' annual leave entitlement is entitled to an allowance (pro rata) in lieu of leave not taken.
After the ECJ decision, the Stringer case was referred back to the House of Lords to decide how the decision applied in the UK. The House of Lords ruled on 10 June 2009 that where a worker has not been paid for annual leave entitlement under the working time regulations, the worker can claim either under the working time regulations or as an unauthorised deduction from wages (which could allow the claim to go back longer than a claim under the working time regulations).
The ECJ decision left it up to national courts to decide whether annual leave can be taken during the year of absence (so in effect four weeks during the absence become annual leave rather than sick leave), or the annual leave can be carried over to the next leave year, but these issues were not covered in the House of Lords' decision. They have, however, started to be clarified to some extent by the ECJ decision in Pereda v Madrid Movilidad.
But the situation with regard to employees who are on long-term sick leave, or who were on long-term sick leave and were not paid for annual leave, remains complex and confusing, and legal advice should be sought.
The House of Lords decision in HM Revenue & Customs v Stringer and others is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/31.html.
Contractual holiday continues to accrue during sick leave, no matter how long the person is off ill, unless the contract says it does not. Employers may want to consider revising future contracts to say that contractual holiday does not accrue during sickness absence of more than a certain period.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about leave (VSLH3 chapter 31)
Go to archived items about disability discrimination (VSLH3 chapter 28)
Go to archived items about dismissal (VSLH3 chapter 34)
STATUTORY SICK PAY
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates s.31.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For sickness absence on or after 6 April 2012, the earnings threshold is expected to be £107 per week (increased from £102) and the statutory sick pay rate is expected to be £85.85 per week (increased from £81.60). Employees earning less than £107 p.w. or not eligible for SSP for other reasons may be entitled to employment and support allowance.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about leave (VSLH3 chapter 31)
FIT NOTES
Updated 30/1/11. This information updates in s.31.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Since 6 April 2010, sick notes saying an employee is not fit for work have been replaced with computer-generated fit notes saying the person is either not fit for work, or "may be fit for work taking account of the following advice". A third option, certifying that the employee is fit for work, was not included, because of widespread concern that GPs would not know enough about particular jobs to know whether the employee is fit to do them.
The purpose of the fit note is to facilitate a return to work, by listing options such as a phased return to work, changes in duties and/or hours, or workplace adaptations, and by encouraging discussion between the GP and employee and between the employee and employer. Proposals for a longer list of options, including an option that the employer refer to employee to an occupational health consultant, have not been included in the final regulations.
Employers need to carefully consider recommendations made by the GP, especially where the employee is or could be legally disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and could therefore bring a claim against the employer for failure to make reasonable adjustments.
But ultimately it is the employer in consultation with the employee who makes the decision about whether to follow the GP's advice. If a change or adaptation to enable the employee to return to work is not possible, the employee remains not fit for work until the end of the fit note period, or until a suitable change or adaptation is possible.
If a change or adaptation is agreed, it should be for a clear period and should be kept under review (not "until you feel able to do more" but "for three weeks [or whatever] and then we will review it".
During the first six months of a health condition, the maximum period for a fit note is three months. After the first six months, the fit note can be for "any clinically appropriate period".
The Department for Work and Pensions' guidance, Statement of fitness for work: A guide for employers, with a summary of the rules, case studies and frequently asked questions, is at www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/fitnote-employer-guide.pdf.
Guidance for employees is at www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/fit-note-employee-guide.pdf.
CIPD, the Health and Safety Executive, Healthy Working Lives and the British Occupational Health Research Foundation have produced guidance specifically for managers who are supporting employees returning to work after long-term sickness. It can be accessed via tinyurl.com/2uw4vdm.
The Social Security(Medical Evidence) and Statutory Sick Pay (Medical Evidence) Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100137_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about leave (VSLH3 chapter 31)
SICKNESS DURING ANNUAL LEAVE
Added 15/2/10. This information creates a new section, Sickness while on leave, after s.31.4.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The long-running Stringer case was about a worker's entitlement to statutory annual leave during sick leave lasting for an entire leave year. In the case of Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA the European Court of Justice gave its decision in September 2009 on a different scenario, where annual leave periods are assigned by the employer but the worker is ill during all or part of the assigned period. In this situation, the ECJ ruled, a worker is entitled to ask the employer to reschedule the part of the statutory annual leave during which they were ill, and if requested the employer is obliged to do this even if this means that some of the leave has to be taken in the next leave year.
The decision confirms the distinction between sick leave the purpose of which is to enable to worker to recover from being ill and annual leave, which is intended to ensure the worker has time for rest, relaxation and leisure. However, it leaves unclear a number of issues, including:
-
whether the right to request reclassification of the leave applies only to the four weeks (20 days) statutory annual leave under the European working time directive, or the entire 5.6 weeks (28 days) entitlement in the UK under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR);
-
how it fits with the fact that under the WTR there is no statutory right for a worker to object to an employer's notice that annual leave must be taken on a specific date or dates;
-
the fact that the WTR do not allow statutory annual leave to be carried forward to the next leave year;
-
whether there is any difference (probably not) where the employee has requested the annual leave period rather than being obliged by the employer to take it at a specified time.
The Pereda decision applies immediately to public sector workers. Until the WTR is amended by Parliament the decision may not apply to private (including voluntary) sector workers. But to avoid the risk of it being held to apply, it is sensible for all employers to assume that employees who are ill for all or part of their full statutory leave (5.6 weeks) are entitled to ask to take that part of the leave as sick leave, and to take it as annual leave at a later date regardless of whether the annual leave dates were set by the employer or requested by the employee, and regardless of whether the rescheduled leave ends up being taken in the next leave year.
Clearly there is a risk of abuse by employees self-certifying that they were ill during annual leave. To reduce this risk, it may be appropriate for the employer to make clear that the usual rules on statutory and/or contractual sick leave and pay, including notifying the employer and providing a fit note (or a comparable note from a doctor where the person is on holiday), apply to any period while the person is ill while on annual leave and may want to take that time as sick leave rather than annual leave. The employer may also want to say that the right to have annual leave reclassified as sick leave applies only to statutory annual leave, and not to any additional period of contractual annual leave.
The ECJ decision in Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA is at www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2009/C27708.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about leave (VSLH3 chapter 31)
RIGHT TO REQUEST
TIME OFF FOR TRAINING
Updated 22/9/11. This information updates s.31.8.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Since 6 April 2010, employees in organisations with 250 or more employees have had a statutory right to request time off for training that would benefit them and the employer. The right was expected to be extended to all employees from 6 April 2011, but the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills announced on 6 July 2011 that this will not happen at least until April 2015.
The government's response to its consultation about the extension can be accessed via tinyurl.com/3mxerj6.
Time to train (not to be confused with a different scheme called train to gain), is similar to the right to request flexible working. The time off does not have to be paid if the training is "off the job" (as opposed to on the job training), and employers are not obliged to contribute to the cost of the training. The right applies only to employees with more than 26 weeks’ continuous service with the employer at the time of making the request.
Guidance for employers is at www.businesslink.gov.uk/timetotrain.
Guidance for employees is at www.direct.gov.uk/timetotrain.
The time to train legislation is ss.63D-63K of the Employment Rights Act 1996, inserted by s.40 of the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 (www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/ukpga_20090022_en_1).
The detailed rules are in the Employee Study and Training (Procedural Requirements) Regulations 2010 (www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100155_en_1)
and the Employee Study and Training (Eligibility, Complaints and Remedies) Regulations 2010
(www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100156_en_1).
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH3 chapter 31)
WORKERS MEMORIAL DAY
Added 15/2/10. This information updates s.31.4.2.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government announced in January 2009 that the UK will officially recognise 28 April which is also the international day of action for safety and health at work as workers memorial day, to commemorate workers who have been killed, seriously injured or made ill through work. The first formally recognised day was 28 April 2010.
Despite a campaign to make workers memorial day a bank holiday, this has not happened. There is no right to time off for the day, but the government will encourage local commemorations to be organised by individuals, employers, trade unions, community organisations and local authorities.
Information is available from the Trades Union Congress at www.tuc.org.uk/h_and_s/index.cfm?mins=293.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH3 chapter 31)
ANTI-SLAVERY DAY
Updated 2/1/12. This information updates s.31.4.2.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Anti-Slavery Day Act 2010, which received royal assent on 8 April 2010, provided for a date to be set to be observed each year as anti-slavery day. The first anti-slavery day was held on 18 October 2011. Like workers memorial day [see above] on 28 April and holocaust memorial day on 27 January it is not a bank holiday, but provides a focus to raise awareness of the millions of people who are victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation, child trafficking, trafficking for forced labour, and domestic servitude; and to draw attention to progress made to combat slavery, human trafficking and exploitation and what still needs to be done.
Information about participating organisations and events is at www.antislavery.org/english/antislavery_day/.
The Act is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/ukpga_20100014_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about time off (VSLH3 chapter 31)
STATUTORY MATERNITY, PATERNITY AND ADOPTION LEAVE AND PAY
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates ss.32.2 to 32.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Statutory maternity pay (SMP) is 90% of the woman's weekly earnings for the first six weeks of maternity leave. For the remaining 33 weeks of the 39-week SMP period, SMP is a flat weekly rate or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is less. For payment weeks starting on or after 6 April 2012, the flat rate is expected to be £135.45 (increased from £128.73).
Statutory paternity pay (SPP) and statutory adoption pay (SAP) are £135.45 per week (increased from £128.73) for weeks starting on or after 6 April 2012, or 90% of the employee's average weekly earnings, whichever is less.
The earnings threshold for eligibility for SMP, SPP and SAP is expected to be £107 per week (increased from £102).
An employer who paid, or was liable to pay, gross class 1 national insurance contributions of £45,000 or less in the individual employee's qualifying tax year can recover 100% of the SMP, SPP or SAP, plus 4.5% compensation. Employers who do not qualify for this small employer relief can recover 92%.
Proposals to increase SMP and SAP from 39 to 52 weeks have been put on hold indefinitely, but additional paternity leave and pay were introduced where the child is due or is matched for adoption on or after 3 April 2011 [see below].
European Union proposals for 20 weeks maternity leave on full pay and two weeks paternity leave on full pay were rejected by the Council of the European Union in December 2010. However alternative proposals will be considered, which could increase the current EU minimum of at least 14 weeks maternity leave, with maternity pay no lower than sickness pay in the member state.
CIPD's very clear factsheet on maternity, paternity and adoption rights is at www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/emplaw/maternity/matpat.htm.
Other information is available at www.acas.org.uk, www.tuc.org.uk, and for employers at www.businesslink.gov.uk and employees at www.direct.gov.uk.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about parents' rights (VSLH3 chapter 32)
ADDITIONAL PATERNITY LEAVE AND PAY
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates ss.32.3.3 & 32.3.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 gave a new right to additional paternity leave (birth) in relation to babies expected on or after 3 April 2011. To be eligible the person must be the child's father or the husband/civil partner of the mother, must have or expect to have the main responsibility (apart from any responsibility of the mother) for bringing up the child, and must have been entitled to ordinary paternity leave from the employer (see below). The term 'fathers' as used below therefore refers to anyone eligible for the new leave and pay, regardless of their gender or whether they are actually the father.
Where a couple who are married or civil partners are notified that they are matched with a child for adoption on or after 3 April 2011, and one person in the couple is entitled to statutory adoption leave, the other will be entitled to additional paternity leave (adoption) if they were entitled to ordinary paternity leave.
-
Fathers/the second adopter in a couple continue to be entitled to ordinary paternity leave and statutory paternity pay [see above] for two weeks at or around the time of the birth or adoption, provided they have 26 weeks' continuous employment with the employer by the end of the 15th week before the expected week of childbirth or by the end of the week before being matched with a child for adoption, are still employed at the time of the leave, and have average earnings of at least the national insurance lower earning limit (£102 per week in 2011-12, expected to be £107 from 6 April 2012).
-
All mothers remain entitled to 52 weeks statutory maternity leave (SML). One person (either male or female) in an adopting couple remain entitled to 52 weeks statutory adoption leave (SAL) provided they have 26 weeks' continuous employment by the end of the week before being matched for adoption. But if the mother or adopter returns to work without taking their full 52 weeks leave, a father/adopter who was entitled to ordinary paternity leave becomes entitled to the mother's/adopter's remaining leave as additional paternity leave (birth) or additional paternity leave (adoption).
-
The maximum entitlement to additional paternity leave is six months. It cannot be taken until at least 20 weeks after the birth or placement for adoption, and cannot last beyond 12 months from the date of birth or placement.
-
A mother on statutory maternity leave or adoptive parent on statutory adoption leave is entitled to 39 weeks statutory maternity pay (SMP) or statutory adoption pay (SAP) is s/he has the necessary 26 weeks of continuous employment and average earnings above the national insurance lower earnings limit. But if the mother or adopter returns to work without using their full entitlement to SMP or SAP, the father/other adopter is entitled to the remainder as additional statutory paternity pay, paid at the same rate as SMP/SAP.
-
There are special rules for adoptions from overseas.
-
Parents must "self-certify" entitlement to additional paternity leave and pay by providing details of their eligibility to their employer. Employers and HM Revenue & Customs may, if they consider it necessary, carry out further checks on entitlement.
-
The right of all parents with at least one year's employment to 13 weeks unpaid parental leave before the child's fifth birthday (or 18th if the child is disabled) remains unchanged. So also does the right of parents with at least 26 weeks continuous employment and a child under 17 (or under 18 if the child is disabled) to request flexible working.
Guidance for employers is available from Business Link via tinyurl.com/4nw5vnq, for employees from Direct.gov via tinyurl.com/ygv5hku, and for both employers and employees at http://www.acas.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1806.
The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20101055_en_1.
The Additional Statutory Paternity Pay (General) Regulations 2010 are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20101056_en_1.
As part of its modern workplaces proposals, the government is proposing to introduce a new system of shared parental leave in 2015 [see In the pipeline for 2012 and beyond].
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about parents' rights (VSLH3 chapter 32)
FLEXIBLE WORKING TO CARE FOR CHILDREN
Updated 2/1/12. This information updates s.32.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The statutory right to request flexible working arrangements to care for children was supposed to be extended on 6 April 2011 to apply to all children aged under 18. However the government announced on 18 March 2011 that it would repeal the extension, so the right continues to apply only if the child is under 17, or under 18 if the child receives disability living allowance. The right to request flexible working to care for children applies to parents, adopters and foster carers, and their partners.
Flexible working might include, for example, compressed hours, flexitime, home working, job sharing, teleworking, term-time working, shift working, staggered hours, or annualised hours. Once the employer and employee have agreed a flexible working arrangement, it is a permanent change to the contract of employment unless the agreement specifies otherwise.
The extension of the right to request would have removed the anomaly that if something happened so a child aged 17 started to need care but was not entitled to disability living allowance, the parent would not be entitled to request flexible working until the child turned 18 and the parent gained the right to request as the carer of an adult.
ACAS guidance and publications on flexible working are at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1616.
The Flexible Working (Eligibility, Complaints and Remedies)(Amendment) Regulations 2010 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/2991/made.
The Flexible Working (Eligibility, Complaints and Remedies)(Amendment)(Revocation) Regulations 2011 are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/989/made.
As part of its modern workplaces proposals, the government is proposing extending the right to request flexible working to all employees who have 26 weeks continuous service, not just parents and carers as at present [see In the pipeline for 2012 and beyond].
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about parents' rights (VSLH3 chapter 32)
CODE OF PRACTICE ON DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
Updated 15/6/09. This information is included in s.33.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For disciplinary and grievance procedures triggered on or after 6 April 2009, the previous statutory procedures are replaced by an ACAS code of practice on discipline and grievance, setting out the basic principles of good practice. It does not have force of law and failure to comply with it is not in itself unlawful. However an employer's unreasonable failure to comply with the code can be taken into account by the employment tribunal and can lead to an increase of up to 25% in any award made by the tribunal, and an employee’s failure to comply can lead to a reduction of up to 25% in any award.
In practice the three stages of the statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures still remain under the new code (written notice, meeting, right of appeal) but without the detailed rigid requirements that could lead to an employer or employee being penalised for a technical breach of the procedures.
The intention of the new procedures is that disciplinary and grievance issues should, if possible, be dealt with through informal discussion. If this is unsuccessful, the key elements in a fair and transparent procedure are defined as dealing with issues promptly, acting consistently, carrying out an investigation to establish the facts, informing the employee of the issue, ensuring the employee can put their case at a disciplinary or grievance meeting before any decisions are made, ensuring the employee has the right to be accompanied, and ensuring the employee’s right to appeal against any formal decision.
Dismissals for a disciplinary reasons should follow the code, but failure to follow it does not make the dismissal automatically unfair as it was under the statutory procedures. The code does not apply to redundancy dismissals, termination of fixed-term contracts, or retirement dismissals.
The code's section on keys to handling disciplinary issues provides guidance on investigations and who should conduct them, the sort of information employees should be provided with before any disciplinary meetings, the role of a companion, gross misconduct, dismissals, and appeals. All parties have an obligation to make every effort to attend disciplinary meetings. In some situations expired disciplinary warnings can be taken into effect (see expired warnings). One change from the statutory procedures is that the employer must inform employees of their right to be accompanied by a companion.
Another significant change from the statutory procedures is that disciplinary warnings have to be dealt with procedurally in the same way as dismissals, which means there must be provision for appeal against a warning.
The keys to handling grievances state that employees should raise grievances formally in writing, without undue delay, with their line manager if they have a concern that cannot be resolved informally. It is made clear that a grievance meeting can be adjourned if an investigation is necessary. The employer's decision has to be in writing, and employees have to appeal if they are not satisfied with the decision, rather than going direct to the tribunal.
Unlike under the statutory procedures it is no longer necessary for an employee to go through a grievance procedure before bringing a claim in the employment tribunal, but failure to do so could be held to be unreasonable and could lead to a decrease of up to 25% in any award to the employee.
The code includes sections on overlapping grievance and disciplinary cases and on collective grievances.
The final version of the code was approved by Parliament on 12 March 2009 and is at www.acas.org.uk/dgcode2009.
The final version of ACAS's guidance, which is more detailed than the code, is at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2179.
Further information, including details of extended opening hours from April for the ACAS helpline and the increased emphasis on mediation as a way to solve workplace disputes, is at www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=2126.
The Employment Act 2008, which brings in the new provisions, is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080024_en_1.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about disciplinary & grievance (VSLH3 chapter 33)
Go to archived items about termination of employment (VSLH3 chapter 34)
TRIBUNALS CAN PASS WHISTLEBLOWING DISCLOSURES TO REGULATORS
Added 2/4/10. This information updates s.33.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A worker who is dismissed or victimised, or a former worker who is victimised, for making a "protected disclosure" (whistleblowing) under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 can bring a claim against the employer.
In whistleblowing cases the tribunal looks only at whether the worker complied with the rules under the Act about what can be disclosed and who it can be disclosed to, and whether the worker was victimised or dismissed because of the disclosure. The tribunal does not look at the substance of the disclosure itself.
From 6 April 2010, the ET1 claim form has a tick box for the worker to indicate whether s/he wants the tribunal to pass details of the protected disclosure to the relevant regulator(s) so the substance of it can, if appropriate, be investigated. Regulators could include, for example, the Charity Commission, Health and Safety Executive or Environment Agency. Various confidentiality options will be available.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about whistleblowing (VSLH3 chapter 33)
EFFECTIVE DATE OF TERMINATION
FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL BY POST
Added 7/11/10. This information updates s.34.8.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The qualifying period and the time limit for bringing unfair and wrongful dismissal claims are based on the effective date of termination (EDT), so this date has fundamental implications for such claims. Where dismissal is without notice for gross misconduct, the EDT is the date the dismissal is communicated to the employee.
A ruling in the Supreme Court on 13 October 2010 confirmed decisions by the employment appeal tribunal and court of appeal that if notice of summary dismissal is sent by post, the date it is communicated to the employee is when the employee actually receives and reads the letter, even if the letter says that dismissal is from the date the letter is written.
Following a disciplinary hearing about an employee's inappropriate behaviour at a private party, Gisda Cyf, a charity based in Wales, had told the employee to expect a letter on 30 November 2006 with its decision. The letter arrived on 30 November and was signed for by the employee's son, but the employee was away from 30 November to 3 December visiting her sister who had just had a baby, and she did not read the letter until 4 December. After going through the organisation's internal appeal procedure, she brought a tribunal claim on 2 March 2007 for unfair dismissal and sex discrimination.
If the EDT was 30 November, when the letter was signed for, she would have been out of time for her tribunal claim, but if the EDT was 4 December, the claim would be within the time legislation. The Supreme Court accepted that she had legitimate reasons for being away over that period and had not deliberately postponed reading the letter, and confirmed that her claim was valid. In its decision, the Court stated that on policy grounds it is important to interpret the time legislation in a manner that is favourable to the employee, and that strict contractual laws concerning termination of contracts should not replace the statutory framework.
Good practice when sending a dismissal notice by post is to give notice to the employee orally, so it is clear that he or she has received the notice, and/or to send it recorded delivery.
The decision in Gisda Cyf v Barratt is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2010/41.html.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about termination of employment (VSLH3 chapter 34)
QUALIFYING PERIOD TO CLAIM UNFAIR DISMISSAL
Added 29/1/12. This information updates ss.34.8.2 & 26.5.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Subject to parliamentary approval, the qualifying period to claim unfair dismissal will be extended from one year to two years, from 6 April 2012. This will apply only to employees whose qualifying period starts on or after 6 April 2012 so anyone employed by the employer on 5 April will remain able to claim unfair dismissal after only one year.
Claims for unfair dismissal where there is no qualifying period, for example where the dismissal is for a reason based on unlawful discrimination, will continue to be able to be made from day one.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about termination of employment (VSLH3 chapter 34)
STATUTORY REDUNDANCY PAY
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates s.35.7.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
For redundancies taking effect on or after 1 February 2012, the maximum weekly pay for calculating statutory redundancy pay is increased from £400 to £430.
For a range of briefings on redundancy (and alternatives to it) see recession resources at www.sandy-a.co.uk/vslh/24windingup.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about redundancy (VSLH3 chapter 35)
EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES AND SETTLEMENT
Updated 29/1/12. This information updates chapter 37 & s.34.8 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills consulted from 27 January to 20 April 2011 on proposals intended to reduce the number of employment tribunal claims and speed up those that do go to tribunal, and announced on 23 November 2011 the proposals that will be taken forward [see In the pipeline for 2012 and beyond]. These include:
-
increasing the qualifying period for claiming unfair dismissal from one year to two (this would not affect claims that do not require a qualifying period, such as discrimination);
-
requiring all employment claims to be submitted to ACAS so that conciliation can be offered before a tribunal claim is made, and encouraging the employer and employee to consider other forms of dispute resolution such as mediation;
-
speeding up the tribunal process by having judges sit alone in unfair dismissal cases;
-
introducing financial penalties for employers found to have breached rights (so an employer would not only have to compensate the employee, but would also have to pay a penalty);
-
reviewing the way employment tribunal awards and "weekly pay" for redundancy pay and certain other purposes are revised each year.
The government announced on 23 January 2012 that two regional mediation networks for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are being set up, in Cambridge and Manchester, as pilot schemes. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will fund training for employees from 24 SMEs in each area, to enable them to provide mediation to organisations in their network. The BIS press release announcing the scheme can be accessed via tinyurl.com/7grqp69.
The consultation documents and response are at tinyurl.com/6r66cxv.
In addition to this BIS consultation, the Ministry of Justice consulted in spring 2011 on introducing fees for employment tribunal cases [see In the pipeline for 2012 and beyond].
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about employment claims and settlement (VSLH3 chapter 37)
CRIMINAL RECORD CHECKS
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Criminal Records Bureau issued on 6 April 2009 a revised code of practice for registered bodies and other recipients of CRB disclosure information. The revised code is intended to ensure organisations do not breach the spirit and requirements of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975 by submitting ineligible disclosure applications. It also seeks to ensure registered and umbrella bodies correctly verify the identity of disclosure applicants; sensitive and personal data in disclosures is correctly managed and used by registered and umbrella bodies and others; and registered bodies and others treat their applicants fairly when considering sensitive disclosure information. Registered bodies which fail to comply with the code may be suspended or deregistered. The code is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/Code%20of%20practice%20Apr%2009.pdf.
The CRB website includes detailed guidance on the code's obligations. Guidance on other aspects of CRB checks is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/guidance.aspx.
The fee for CRB checks is £26 for standard disclosures and £36 for enhanced. The fee is waived for checks on volunteers, defined in the Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) Regulations 2002 as "a person engaged in an activity which involves spending time, unpaid (except for travel and other approved out-of-pocket expenses), doing something which aims to benefit some third party other than or in addition to a close relative".
A standard disclosure (also referred to as a criminal record certificate) lists convictions which are "spent" under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, unspent convictions and cautions. For work with children (defined in most cases as under 18) or vulnerable adults the disclosure is enhanced (called an enhanced criminal record certificate), listing in addition police information such as suspicions that did not lead to a caution or conviction, and information about whether the person is barred from working with (as appropriate) children or vulnerable adults.
Standard and enhanced checks are available only in relation to professions or positions specified in various exception orders made under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 mostly positions involving access to children or vulnerable adults, work in health or education, and certain professions such as accountancy. The CRB can provide information about positions for which disclosures can be obtained.
In exceptional cases a care worker may be allowed to start work in a care home, for a domiciliary care agency, or as an adult placement carer before a CRB check has been issued, provided an AdultFirst check has been done by the CRB (fee £6).
Because of widespread concern about CRB checks being carried out where there is no statutory entitlement to do so in particular in relation to volunteers, where the checks are free the Office of the Third Sector issued guidance in 2008 on CRB checks for organisations that use volunteers. Although the guidance is no longer available, it warned that organisations which carry out free checks when they are not entitled to do so could be required to pay the fee for the checks. For guidance on trustee checks (currently being revised), see the Charity Commission's CC30 Finding new trustees: What charities need to know at www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc30.aspx.
CIPD (the Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development) updated in March and April 2009 its guidance on employing people with criminal records, risk assessment in relation to employing people with criminal records, and recruitment of people working with children and vulnerable adults. These are at www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/dvsequl/exoffenders/crimrec.htm,
www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/dvsequl/exoffenders/crimrecra.htm and
www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/recruitmen/general/recruitypw.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about safeguarding (VSLH3 chapter 41)
VETTING AND BARRING SCHEME
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Home Office issued in March 2010 guidance on the vetting and barring scheme (VBS), which is essential reading for any organisation which works with children or with adults defined under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 as vulnerable. It is at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/VBS_guidance_ed1_2010.pdf.
Although the government announced on 15 June 2010 that some aspects of VBS registration in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland were being reviewed and "remodelled", much of the guidance still applies. A summary of the guidance, containing only those provisions that apply to safeguarding during the VBS review period, is at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk/pdf/VBS%20Interim%20guidance.pdf.
The Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) newsletter of 15 June 2010, available by registering for newsletters on the ISA's website at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk, explains how to apply for CRB checks during the review period. Up to date information about CRB checks is available from the CRB at www.crb.homeoffice.gov.uk. The VBS contact centre is at 0300 123 1111 and the CRB customer services centre at 0870 9090 811.
The ISA recommends that employers get their information about the VBS and CRB checks via Business Link at tinyurl.com/34x3oyh, but I am quite sure that one aspect of this is incorrect [see second bullet point below] and am therefore not currently recommending it.
Until any recommendations arising from the review are implemented, provisions of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 which have already been implemented, and existing rules under the Protection of Children Act, Care Standards Act and related legislation that have not yet been repealed, continue to apply, as summarised below.
The dates and details below refer to England. Organisations outside England should take advice locally, because although most provisions are the same for Wales there are a few differences, Northern Ireland has separate legislation although it closely follows England and Wales, and Scotland is developing a parallel scheme.
Suspended for the time being
While the government's review is in progress, the following provisions, which were due to come into effect on 26 July 2010 and in November 2010, have been put on hold.
-
Voluntary registration with the ISA. Provision for voluntary ISA registration for individuals starting work or changing roles, whether paid or unpaid, in regulated activities with children or vulnerable adults has been suspended. Voluntary registration was due to start on 26 July 2010.
-
Compulsory registration with the ISA. Compulsory registration of anyone starting work or changing roles, paid or unpaid, in a regulated activity was due to start in November 2010. The statement issued by the Home Office on 15 June and information on the ISA website seem very clear that all registration, including compulsory registration from November, has been suspended. But as of 20 June the Business Link website said, at tinyurl.com/35eon69, that compulsory registration will start in November. I am 99.9% sure this is an error and have contacted Business Link. If you check their website and find it has been changed or if you learn from the ISA that the Business Link statement is indeed correct please let me know. (The fact that Business Link, a supposedly reliable source of information, almost certainly has this wrong is an indication of just how confusing the information relating to this whole process is.)
-
Assuming that compulsory registration from November of new workers and those changing roles is suspended, so too will be compulsory registration, phased in over five years, of anyone who is already in regulated or controlled activities when compulsory registration starts.
-
ISA registration process. The arrangement for ISA registration through the Criminal Records Bureau, with a combined CRB/ISA application form, has been suspended. However, the combined forms have already started to be issued, and from 20 July 2010 all applications received by the CRB must be on the new form. The new form can be used before then, from 28 June 2010, but applications submitted on the new form will not be processed until 26 July. The sections of the form that relate specifically to ISA registration should not be filled in. Information about how to fill in the forms is available from the CRB or in the ISA newsletter of 15 June [see above].
-
Employers' access to ISA information. Provision for all employers, including domestic employers (of nannies, private tutors and teachers, care workers etc) to make free, instant online ISA checks from 26 July to see if a person is registered or is barred from work with vulnerable groups, has been suspended. Information about whether a person is barred will continue to be provided to employers and volunteer-using organisations only through CRB enhanced checks.
-
Provision for employers to register with the ISA, express an interest in a person's ISA registration status, and be informed by the ISA if the person is subsequently barred, has been suspended.
-
New criminal offence. Until compulsory registration starts, the provision will not come into effect making it an offence, with a fine of up to £5,000, for an employer to employ a person, whether paid or unpaid, to work with children or vulnerable adults in a regulated who is not registered with the ISA, or to fail to check the ISA system. However, it is already an offence subject to the same fine knowingly to allow a barred person to engage in a regulated activity, or for such a person to seek or take on work with the group from which they are barred. It is also unlawful for an employer or organisation to allow a barred person to engage in a controlled activity, unless there is suitable provision for supervision.
Consultations
Two aspects of the vetting and barring scheme which have not yet been implemented were being consulted on even before the new review, with the consultations ending on 9 July 2010. The results of these consultations don't seem to be on the internet, or at least I can't find them.
-
Controlled activity. Whether the category of controlled activities, where people have less access to children or vulnerable adults than in regulated activities, should be reduced or removed by moving some posts into regulated activity and removing others from regulation.
-
Portability. Whether the statutory requirement for some workers to have CRB checks when they move to another regulated activity should be revised, so the employer only has to check their ISA status.
Still in force
Provisions that were implemented on 12 October 2009, or in some cases earlier, remain in force. These include:
-
CRB checks. All CRB checks for work with children or vulnerable adults are enhanced. Standard CRB checks are no longer available for work with children or vulnerable adults, but remain available where checks are required for other types of work or licences [see Criminal record checks, above].
-
Where a criminal record check is required for certain types of work with children or vulnerable adults, for example under the Care Standards Act 2000, it continues to be required.
-
Where a criminal record check is not required, but is permitted under various Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Orders, an employer or organisation which considers it appropriate may carry out a check. Checks continue to be unlawful where they are not permitted.
-
Regulated activities. An employer or organisation which manages or controls regulated activity is called in the Home Office guidance a RAP a regulated activity provider. The range of regulated activities from which people can be barred is now wider than it was before October 2009, especially in relation to work with vulnerable adults, but some aspects of regulated activity were eased following the Singleton review [see Regulated activity below].
-
Duty to refer. Employers and service providers of regulated and controlled activities, social services, professional regulators, and personnel suppliers (employment agencies, employment businesses and education institutions) must notify the ISA of relevant information about individuals who pose a threat to children or vulnerable adults. The ISA's detailed referral guidance, including the procedure for referrals, can be accessed via tinyurl.com/34rfbpv. It is a criminal offence for a body which has a statutory duty to refer to fail to do so without having a reasonable excuse.
-
Employers and organisations which do not have a duty to refer, parents/private employers, and members of the public may but do not have to refer information to social services or the police, who will investigate and if appropriate refer it on to the ISA.
-
Vetting and barring. Decisions about inclusion on the children's barred list (which replaced the Protection of Children Act list and list 99) and the adults' barred list (which replaced the Protection of Vulnerable Adults list), are made by the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). Employers and volunteer-using organisations find out if someone is barred via an enhanced CRB check.
-
It is an offence for a barred individual to seek or undertake a regulated activity, whether paid or unpaid, with children or vulnerable adults, or for an employer or organisation knowingly to allow a barred person to engage in a regulated activity, or to engage in a controlled activity without adequate supervision.
-
The ISA will continuously monitor criminal records and information from employers, social services, ,regulators etc, and will review barring decisions as relevant new information becomes available. Under the original VBS, if the monitoring results in barring of an individual, employers who had registered an interest would be notified. This provision will not be implemented at this stage. Even when and if it is implemented, employers will not be notified of criminal offences, convictions or other information that does not result in barring. This information will continue to be available only through CRB checks.
The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, setting out the legislative framework for the scheme, is at www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/2006/cukpga_20060047_en_1,
with explanatory notes at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/en2006/2006en47.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about safeguarding (VSLH3 chapter 41)
REGULATED ACTIVITY UNDER THE VETTING AND BARRING SCHEME
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.6 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In relation to the vetting and barring scheme [see above], a regulated activity is one which involves contact with children or vulnerable adults and:
-
takes place frequently or intensively and is of a specified nature, including teaching, training, instruction, care, supervision, some advice or guidance, some treatment or therapy, some transport, or moderating an internet chatroom etc likely to be used wholly or mainly by children or vulnerable adults; or
-
takes place frequently or intensively and is in a specified place such as a school or care home; or
-
most fostering or childcare; or
-
being a governor of an educational body.
Under the original legislation, "intensively" meant it took place overnight or on three or more days in a 30-day period. Following the Singleton review of the definition of regulated activity in autumn 2009, the definition of "overnight" remains an activity that takes place between 2am and 6am and has the opportunity for face to face contact with a child or vulnerable adult. But from 1 April 2010, the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Regulated Activity, Devolution and Miscellaneous Provisions) Order 2010 redefined intensively as four or more days in a 30-day period. The order is at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/plain/uksi_20101154_en.
The legislation does not define "frequently". Home Office guidance originally defined it as taking place once a month or more, but the Home Office vetting and barring scheme guidance issued in March 2010 defined it generally as being carried out once a week or more frequently on an ongoing basis. But in relation to health and social care it generally remains once a month or more. These definitions are in appendix B of the guidance, which has the status of statutory guidance.
Other changes following the Singleton review, as set out in the Home Office guidance, include:
-
Being a trustee of a children's or vulnerable adults' charity is not a regulated activity, unless the trustee is carrying out a specified activity or working in a specified setting frequently or intensively.
-
Private arrangements between parents or friends are not regulated. But where an organisation makes the decision about who will have contact with a child or vulnerable adult, it becomes a regulated activity.
-
Exchange visits of less than 28 days, where overseas parents take responsibility for selecting the volunteer host family, are treated as private arrangements.
-
Going into different schools or similar settings to work with different groups is not a regulated activity, but if the writer (or whoever) goes into the same setting often enough for it to be frequent or intensive, it becomes a regulated activity.
-
16-18 year olds who engage in regulated activity as part of their continuing education will not have to register with the ISA.
-
There is a three-month exemption from the requirement to register for overseas visitors bringing their own group of children to the UK, provided the visitors work only with their own group. If they work with other children, ISA registration is required.
The Home Office guidance is at www.isa.homeoffice.gov.uk/PDF/VBS_guidance_ed1_2010.pdf.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about safeguarding (VSLH3 chapter 41)
REGISTRATION OF HEALTH AND ADULT SOCIAL CARE PROVIDERS
Updated 20/6/10. This information updates s.41.3.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Voluntary sector providers of healthcare and adult social care must be registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) if they carry out regulated activities as defined under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Regulated activities include some but not necessarily all provision of domiciliary personal care; accommodation for people who require nursing or personal care or treatment for substance abuse; treatment of disease, disorder or injury; surgical procedures; diagnostic and screening procedures; where immediate action or attention is needed, telephone or email medical advice by a body established for that purpose; maternity services, termination of pregnancy and some family planning services; and nursing services that are not part of another regulated activity. This is only a summary and it will be a criminal offence to engage in a regulated activity without being registered with the CQC, so organisations which think they may be required to register should take advice.
The regulations are at www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/uksi_20100781_en_1.
The Care Quality Commission's website is at www.cqc.org.uk.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about safeguarding (VSLH3 chapter 41)
VOLUNTEERING
"FIT AND PROPER PERSON" CERTIFICATE FOR VOLUNTEERS?
Updated 13/6/11. This information would create a new sub-section in s.39.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Christopher Chope MP (Con, Christchurch) has tabled the Volunteering Bill in Parliament, intended to promote volunteering and enable potential volunteers to self-certify that they are a fit and proper person for their activities. The certificate would be a signed declaration by a potential volunteer stating that he or she has no unspent convictions. (An unspent conviction is one which under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 is still "live", i.e. is a recent conviction, or one which is so serious it will never become spent.) For volunteers aged under 18, the certificate would be countersigned by a parent or guardian.
A potential volunteer who provides a certificate would not need a criminal record check even for work with children and vulnerable adults. "Volunteer" is not defined in the bill.
The fit and proper persons certificate as defined under this bill should not be confused with the certificate of the same name which HM Revenue and Customs now requires for trustees and managers of charities which recover tax on gift aid donations or claim other tax reliefs and exemptions, to show they are "fit and proper persons" to manage the charity's funds.
Volunteering England has said, "Whilst we welcome the move to reduce the red tape surrounding volunteering, we do not believe the proposals in Mr Chope's private member’s bill are the answer. Safeguarding is an important issue, and we hope that reforms to the current CRB system within the Protection of Freedoms Bill will strike the appropriate balance ensuring vulnerable people are protected whilst making sure volunteers aren't put off." For the same reasons, the government does not support the bill.
The bill had its second reading debate in the House of Commons on 10 June 2011. The debate was resumed on 17 June.
The bill is available at services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/volunteering.html, and the debate on 10 June can be accessed via tinyurl.com/3svgxe2.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
VOLUNTEER RIGHTS CALL TO ACTION
Updated 22/3/11. This information updates s.39.1.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Following a number of high profile (well, high profile within the voluntary sector) cases involving clear breakdowns of communication between managers or management committees/boards and volunteers, Volunteering England convened in November 2009 an independent volunteer rights inquiry to look into and make recommendations about the treatment of volunteers and the rights volunteers have if they are mistreated by their organisation.
Its interim report, published in July 2010, was depressing reading. Possible solutions identified in the report include boards appointing a trustee with responsibility for volunteering; an independent redress mechanism such as an arbitration scheme, volunteer complaints commission or ombudsman; codes of conduct; development of Investing in Volunteers and/or Investing in People to further improve volunteer management; good practice information available on websites; and a review of legislation to ensure volunteers are not systematically disadvantaged or discriminated against.
Following feedback on the interim report and the suggested recommendations, the inquiry issued a call to action, the "3R Promise", on 2 March 2011. This asks organisations to commit to getting it right, achieving reconciliation, and accepting responsibility in resolving conflicts with volunteers. The 3R Promise is at www.volunteering.org.uk/3RPromise, and the interim report can be accessed via tinyurl.com/34mnuxw.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
ISSUES IN REIMBURSING VOLUNTEER EXPENSES
Added 14/11/10. This information s.39.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), an initiative of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, published a report in April 2009 explaining the complex legislative framework surrounding reimbursement of volunteer expenses. The Department for Work and Pensions, says LITRG, worries that reimbursements might have to be taken into account for benefits purposes; HMRC worries that reimbursements could be disguised income and should be subject to tax; the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills worries that reimbursements could be disguised pay to avoid having to pay national minimum wage. And there are additional issues for asylum seekers, charity trustees, tax credits, volunteers who receive benefits in kind or so-called honoraria, or are self-employed...
The report recommended formation of a working group of key organisations to discuss the issues, with the objective of simplification; the public services website Direct.gov.uk should coordinate the relevant information on its website into a coherent whole; and volunteers should be able to donate their reimbursement back to the charity or community amateur sports club for which they are volunteering, without the current paperwork.
There is no further information about the report on the LITRG website, so it may have disappeared with the election in May 2010. But it remains a clear, detailed explanation of the relevant legislation, case law and guidance, and is well worth reading if you are concerned about these issues.
The report can be accessed via tinyurl.com/2a8vl9s, with a short press release at www.litrg.org.uk/News/2009/volunteers-expenses-in-the-spotlight.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
VOLUNTEERING CONFIRMED NOT TO BE AN OCCUPATION
Updated 31/3/11. This information updates s.39.4.2.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A number of cases have confirmed that under UK legislation, volunteers can claim workers' rights (discrimination, minimum wage, working time etc) only if they can show they are working under a contract, and can claim employment rights such as unfair dismissal only if they can show it is a contract of employment.
A CAB volunteer took a different approach in the case of X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau. X was a CAB volunteer who was asked to leave, and claimed disability discrimination. She said the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 implemented the European Equal Treatment Directive, which prohibits discrimination in employment, and in access to employment and occupation. X argued that volunteering should be treated as an occupation and is therefore covered by the Equal Treatment Directive, and that volunteering was a method by which the CAB recruited employees and therefore came within the Directive's "access to employment" provisions.
In October 2009 the employment appeal tribunal confirmed the employment tribunal's decision that volunteering does not constitute an occupation. The EAT also said that the CAB did not treat volunteering as a necessary requirement for employment and volunteers were not given preference in selection for employment, so the claimant was not being discriminated against in access to employment or occupation. The court of appeal upheld this decision on 26 January 2011, saying volunteering would be an occupation only if the volunteer's work was vocational training or it was remunerated.
X has asked the court of appeal for leave to take the case to the supreme court, where she would ask the supreme court to refer the case to the European court of justice. If the court of appeal refuses, X would have to ask the supreme court for leave to take it further.
The EAT decision is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2009/0220_08_3010.html,
and the court of appeal decision at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/28.html
.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
PAID "VOLUNTEER" HELD NOT TO BE WORKING UNDER A CONTRACT
Added 29/5/11. This information updates s.39.4.2.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
As indicated in the item above, volunteers can claim workers' rights (discrimination, minimum wage, working time etc) only if they can show they are working under a contract personally to do the work, and can claim employment rights such as unfair dismissal only if they can show the contract they are working under is a contract of employment.
At its simplest, a contract nearly always exists if a person is paid for work, and it is a contract of employment if one party is obliged to provide work to an individual, and the individual is obliged to do it.
A recent case involved an army cadet force (ACF) adult instructor, described in his terms of service as a "voluntary youth worker" but who would be paid for working up to 28 training days per year. Training days above 28 would be paid only if authorised by the ACF cadet commandant.
The employment appeal tribunal said on 11 April 2011 that the instructor could not bring a claim under disability discrimination legislation because there was no obligation on the ACF to provide training days and no obligation on him to accept them if they were offered, and he was paid only for the days he worked.
Having read his terms of service as set out in the case transcript, it seems to me perfectly clear that there was no mutuality of obligation and therefore it was not a contract of employment, but that he was nonetheless working under a contract under which if paid work was offered and he accepted it, he would have to do it personally. I therefore disagree with the EAT's decision, and think the instructor was entitled to bring a disability discrimination case. But hey, what do I know; I'm just a trainer and consultant. (Just don't offer me "up to 10 days training in the next year", then try to say that I'm not working under a contract if you offer and I accept some or all of those days!)
The (flawed, in my view) decision in Breakell v West Midlands Reserve Forces' and Cadets' Association named as Shropshire Army Cadet Force is at www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2011/0372_10_1104.html.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
VOLUNTEERS WITHOUT SPONSORSHIP CERTIFICATE NOT ADMITTED TO U.K.
Added 22/3/11. This information updates s.39.6.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Under the points-based immigration system (PBS), people from outside the European Economic Area (EEA) who are entitled to work or study in the UK under PBS tiers 1-5 and their dependents can volunteer in the UK. In addition, tier 5 (temporary workers) includes provision for charity workers, who can do unpaid voluntary work in the UK for a charity for up to 12 months provided they are sponsored by a registered charity; they receive only accommodation, meal and a living allowance as allowed under the minimum wage legislation; they do not remain in the UK for more than 12 months; and they meet certain other requirements.
A case from early 2009, which has only recently been drawn to my attention (thanks Mark) shows how this rule is enforced. In March 2009, 11 volunteers from the US who had raised their own funding to travel to Edinburgh and work for 10 days in homeless hostels there, were not allowed into the UK because the Scottish church group that had arranged the visit was not registered with the UK Border Agency as a sponsor. The Scottish group had applied and paid to become a sponsor, but the application had not been processed in time for the group to issue the necessary certificates of sponsorship to the volunteers before they arrived.
Further details are in a Sunday Times article at www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5864071.ece.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
"COMMON SENSE, COMMON SAFETY" H&S PROPOSALS
Added 25/5/11. This information updates chapter 40 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Common sense, common safety, the report by Lord Young of Graffham, the prime minister's advisor on health and safety, was published on 15 October 2010. Its 38 recommendations on health and safety law and claims for compensation include (this is not a full list):
The "compensation culture"
a simplified claims procedure for low value personal injury claims;
it should be made clear (though legislation if necessary) that people will not be held liable for any consequences due to well intentioned voluntary acts on their part.
Low hazard workplaces
the HSE should simplify the risk assessment procedure for low hazard workplaces such as offices, classrooms and shops, with simpler interactive risk assessments for low hazard workplaces available on the HSE website [see H&S policy and risk assessments];
the HSE should develop periodic checklists to enable businesses operating in low hazard environments to check and record their compliance with regulations, and online video demonstrations of best practice in completing forms;
the HSE should develop similar checklists for use by voluntary organisations;
employers should be exempt from risk assessments for employees working from home in a low hazard environment;
self-employed people in low hazard businesses should be exempt from risk assessments.
Raising standards
all h&s consultants should be accredited to professional bodies;
a web-based directory of accredited h&s consultants should be established [see Register of occupational safety and health consultants].
Insurance
insurance companies should cease to require businesses operating in low hazard environments to employ h&s consultants to carry out full h&s risk assessments;
where h&s consultants are employed to carry out full h&s risk assessments, only qualified consultants who are included in the web-based directory should be used;
there should be consultation with the insurance industry to ensure that worthwhile activities are not unnecessarily curtailed on h&s grounds;
insurance companies should draw up a code of practice on h&s for businesses and the voluntary sector, failing which, legislation should be considered.
Education
the process that schools and similar organisations undertake before taking children on trips should be simplified;
a single consent form should cover all activities a child may undertake during his or her time at a school;
there should be a simplified risk assessment for classrooms;
the system of risk assessment should shift to a system of risk/benefit assessment, and consideration should be given to reviewing the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 to separate out play and leisure from workplace contexts.
Local authorities
officials who ban events on h&s grounds should put their reasons in writing;
citizens should have a route for redress to challenge local officials' decisions;
local authorities should conduct an internal review of all refusals on grounds of h&s;
citizens should be able to refer unfair decisions to the ombudsman, and a fast-track process should be implemented to ensure that decisions can be overturned within two weeks.
H&S legislation
the HSE should produce clear separate guidance under the code of practice focused on small and medium businesses engaged in lower risk activities;
the current h&s regulations should be consolidated in to a single document [ARGH! NO! I don't want to have to read through a massive piece of legislation just to find the section that applies to computer screens or manual handling or whatever!].
RIDDOR
RIDDOR should be amended by extending to seven days the period before an injury or accident needs to be reported [see RIDDOR changes;
the operation of RIDDOR should be re-examined to determine whether it is the best approach to providing an accurate national picture of workplace accidents.
Combining food safety and h&s inspections
food safety and h&s inspectors should be combined in local authorities;
local authorities should be obliged to participate in the Food Standards Agency's food hygiene rating scheme.
Adventure training
the Adventure Activities Licensing Authority should be abolished and licensing should be replaced with a code of practice [see Abolition of AALA].
The government accepted all of the recommendations in the report, but there is no timeframe for implementation.
The Young report can be accessed on the Cabinet Office website via tinyurl.com/3pew4cs.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
ABOLITION OF ADVENTURE ACTIVITIES LICENSING AUTHORITY
Added 25/5/11. This information updates s.1.9.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Proposals are being developed to abolish the Adventure Activities Licensing Authority, as recommended by Lord Young in his review of health and safety law in 2010. The current contract with TQS to deliver licensing has been extended until 30 March 2012, but it has not yet been decided whether this will be the final date for licensing.
HSE will produce and consult on a code of practice for adventure activities. Until the licensing regime is reviewed, the code is put in place and the legislation is removed, providers of adventure activities must continue to comply with the current requirements. HSE is also consulting with the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales.
Up to date information is available at www.hse.gov.uk/aala/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
HSE INFOLINE TO DISAPPEAR
Added 22/9/11. This information updates s.40.1.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Health & Safety Executive's infoline at 0845 345 0055, which I always found really helpful, disappeared on 30 September 2011 and we now have to depend on the HSE website at www.hse.gov.uk. I think the website is excellent, but it can't replace a real person at the end of a phone line.
In a press release on 12 September HSE said, "Various improvements have been made to HSE's website to coincide with the closure of Infoline. There is clearer information on what HSE does and doesn't do, so people can check that HSE is the right organisation to assist them, and expanded 'question & answer' sections for the most frequent health and safety enquiries such as those on RIDDOR reporting and first aid."
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
RISK, LIABILITY AND THE SOCIAL VALUE OF ACTIVITIES
Added 25/5/11. This information updates ss.22.3.1 & 40.2.5 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The House of Lords decision in Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council & others (www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2003/47.html) in 2003 introduced into negligence cases the concept of balancing the likelihood and potential seriousness of injury from an activity, against the social value of the activity. This was incorporated into s.1 of the Compensation Act 2006, which says that "a court considering a claim in negligence or breach of statutory duty may, in determining whether the defendant should have taken particular steps to meet a standard of care (whether by taking precautions against a risk or otherwise), have regard to whether a requirement to take those steps might prevent a desirable activity from being undertaken at all, to a particular extent or in a particular way, or discourage persons from undertaking functions in connection with a desirable activity".
This means that if a person is negligent or in breach of a statutory duty and as a result a person is injured, the court will be able to take into account that the activity was, for example, being run by a volunteer or a not-for-profit organisation and that without the volunteers or the organisation, the "desirable activity" might not have taken place at all.
Some cases in recent years illustrate how this principle is interpreted and sometimes reinterpreted by the courts, or illustrate other factors taken into account in negligence cases or cases involving breach of health and safety law.
Charlotte Shaw, aged 14, was preparing for the Ten Tors training expedition in March 2007 when she fell into a swollen stream and drowned. Some of the 11 students in the group had asked for the trek to be stopped because of bad weather but it was decided it should go ahead. In the inquest into her death, considerable emphasis was given to the value of the Ten Tors, and the fact that this was believed to be the first death since the Ten Tors was started in 1960.
However, at the time of Charlotte's fall the three teachers accompanying the group were having breakfast at a cafe in a nearby town; for various reasons none of the teachers went to the checkpoints where the students were to have been met; there were no teachers with the students when they crossed the stream, although a passing Scout leader had stopped to help. The teachers, however, said that the students decided unanimously to continue the trek, and were told not to cross the stream.
The crown prosecution service decided there was not enough evidence to bring a manslaughter charge against Kingsley College, Bideford (called Edgehill College when Charlotte attended) and the two teachers who were overseeing the expedition. But Charlotte's mother is now bringing a civil claim against the school and one teacher, claiming they were negligent in their care. The case will be heard in the high court, probably in 2012, and the "social value" argument may be a factor.
Uren v Corporate Leisure (UK) Ltd and Ministry of Defence emphasises the importance of risk assessments. Taking part in an RAF fun day in 2005, Robert Uren dove headfirst into an inflatable pool with 18 inches of water, to retrieve pieces of plastic fruit from the bottom. Other competitors had done so safely, but Uren broke his neck, is now tetraplegic and sued the MoD and Corporate Leisure (UK) Ltd, the contractor who had supplied the pool.
The high court initially said that even though health and safety risk assessments had not been carried out, failure to do so did not in this case mean there was a breach of duty of care, because the danger of diving into a small pool was so obvious that participants should have acted accordingly, and the social value of the game outweighed the very small risk of injury. The court of appeal disagreed, and on 2 February 2011 referred the case back to a high court judge to reconsider the level of risk.
The original high court decision is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2010/46.html, and the court of appeal decision is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/66.html.
In Scout Association v Barnes (www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1476.html), 13-year-old Mark Barnes was injured in 2001 in a game similar to musical chairs where the lights were turned off as the boys ran to grab wooden blocks. Even with the lights off the room was not in total darkness, and the Scout Association argued that risks from the game were balanced by its social value. The court of appeal disagreed, saying that turning off the lights increased the excitement of the game, but did not increase its social or educative value and thus did not justify the foreseeable risks.
When 25-year-old Gary Poppleton fell on a youth centre climbing wall, was paralysed and sued the centre, the high court found the centre was 25% liable for not warning him that matting at the foot of the climbing wall did not provide full protection against injury. The court of appeal overturned the high court, saying the centre was not liable, because it should be obvious to adults who engage in such activities that there is a degree of unavoidable risk, and that matting cannot completely protect against possibly severe injury.
The court of appeal decision in Trustees of the Portsmouth Youth Activities Committee (A Charity) v Poppleton is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/646.html.
In a case brought by the Health and Safety Executive against John Summerfield, former headteacher of a sixth form college in Liverpool, the crown court accepted that his motives were well intentioned but this could not override his ignoring the risks of his actions. At an end of term party celebrating A-level results, Summerfield took a dozen students, who the court said were "possibly slightly inebriated", onto the roof of the school to look at new buildings. Although he warned them about a skylight, student Joel Murray fell through the skylight, resulting in a fractured skull, several broken ribs, a perforated eardrum and damage to both eyes. Summerfield was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £22,000 legal costs for ignoring, in breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the school's rule that the roof was off-limits.
In another case brought by HSE, Mental Health Matters, based in Sunderland, was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay £20,000 costs in February 2010 after employee Ashleigh Ewing was stabbed to death by a service user in 2006. The charity admitted it knew the service user had a history of violence and refusing to take his medication and knew his mental health was deteriorating, but Ewing was sent to visit him at his home on her own, on the last day of her six-month probationary period. It was acknowledged that even if risk assessments had been carried out Ewing might still have been killed, but the likelihood could have been reduced. HSE's head of operations said, "This is an unusual case which shows the need for employers to assess risks to employees who visit individuals in their homes and for arrangements to be revised when changes occur. We believe that if Mental Health Matters had carried out a risk assessment, it would have resulted in the visiting arrangements being reviewed."
Following the case, HSE made the point that working alone is not in itself against the law, but the law requires employers and others to think about and deal with any health and safety risks before people should be allowed to work alone. HSE's guidance on lone working is at www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg73.pdf. The TUC also has a guide to lone working, at ww.tuc.org.uk/h_and_s/tuc-17252-f0.cfm.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about liability (VSLH3 chapter 22)
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
FIRST CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CONVICTION
Updated 25/5/11. This information updates s.22.3.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
R v Peter Eaton and Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd, the first trial under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, ended in Bristol crown court on 17 February 2011 when Cotswold became the first company to be found guilty under the Act. The case concerned a geologist, Alexander Wright, who was killed when a trench where he had been taking soil samples collapsed. On 11 May 2011 the company lost its appeal against conviction.
A charge of corporate manslaughter (called corporate homicide in Scotland) can be brought against an organisation, where a person is killed and there has been gross failure by senior management. This could include gross failure to ensure safe working practices, safe premises, safety for consumers or members of the public, or any other serious breach of duty of care.
Under sentencing guidance published in February 2010, the minimum fine for an organisation convicted of corporate manslaughter is unlikely to be less than £500,000 and could be millions of pounds. Although Cotswold geotechnical's annual turnover was only £333,000 in 2008 when Wright was killed, it was fined £385,000, but will be allowed to pay this at £38,500 per year for 10 years.
In addition to a corporate manslaughter charge brought against the organisation, a manslaughter charge can be brought against an individual who kills someone through a grossly negligent act or omission (failing to do something), without intending to kill them, and individual employees, managers and in some cases governing body members can be fined or even imprisoned, and an incorporated organisation can be fined, for breach of health and safety or similar laws. And a person who has been injured, or the estate of a person who has been killed, can bring a negligence claim against an individual, manager, incorporated organisation or members of the governing body of an unincorporated organisation.
Cotswold Geotechnical faced not only the corporate manslaughter charge but also one for breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. Eaton, a director, was charged with gross negligence, manslaughter, and a breach of health and safety legislation, but a judge ruled in 2010 that Eaton was too unwell to stand trial for the charges against him as an individual, and asked the prosecution to consider whether the two different burdens of proof for the corporate manslaughter and H&S charges against the company might confuse a jury. The prosecution asked the jury to consider only the offence of corporate manslaughter.
The Crown Prosecution Service press release on the case is at www.cps.gov.uk/news/press_releases/107_11/.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about liability (VSLH3 chapter 22)
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
H&S POLICIES AND RISK ASSESSMENTS
Updated 25/5/11. This information updates ss.40.2.6 & 40.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The HSE website now includes a downloadable risk assessment and policy template which brings together an organisation's risk assessment, health and safety policy and record of health and safety arrangements in one document.
The template can be accessed via tinyurl.com/64fafj5. I recommend that volunteer-using organisations change the second item in the template's statement of general policy to "To provide adequate training to ensure employees and volunteers are competent to do their work", and the third item to "To engage and consult with employees and volunteers on day-to-day health and safety conditions and provide advice and supervision on occupational health".
Example risk assessments on the HSE website including for charity shops, food preparation and service, and village halls (also suitable for small community centres and similar premises) can be used as guides for completing the template, or can be used separately from the template. The example risk assessments can be accessed via www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/index.htm.
Common sense, common safety, the report on health and safety legislation by Lord Young in October 2010, made a number of recommendations on low hazard workplaces such as offices, classrooms and shops. As part of implementing these recommendations:
-
HSE launched an online risk assessment tool for offices in October 2010, which takes only about 20 minutes to complete (www.hse.gov.uk/risk/office.htm);
-
a draft version of a similar online risk assessment tool for shops was issued in December 2010, with the consultation ending on 8 March 2011 (www.hse.gov.uk/consult/condocs/risk-assessment/shop.htm;)
-
HSE launched on 28 March 2011 Health and safety made simple, a website bringing together its guidance for small and low risk employers (www.hse.gov.uk/simple-health-safety/index.htm; there is a link to a PDF printable version);
-
Voluntary organisations: Managing low risk was launched on 31 March, to bring together links to resources of specific relevance not to voluntary organisations as such, but to organisations that use volunteers (www.hse.gov.uk/voluntary/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
MANAGING STRESS AT WORK
Added 25/5/11. This information updates s.40.5.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Work-related stress: What the law says, published in September 2010, highlights the potential legal risks employers face if they ignore their responsibilities to prevent and manage stress at work and includes real cases where employers have faced significant compensation payments. The guide was published by CIPD in association with ACAS, HSE, and the cross-government Health, Work and Wellbeing programme, and includes sections on identifying a problem, preventing harm, protecting individuals, managing the workplace, the management standards for work-related stress, managing stress checklist, and further reading. It is available via tinyurl.com/3r9e8r2.
Further CIPD resources are Stress and mental health at work, introductory guidance updated in September 2010, at tinyurl.com/3w8w4nk, and an information page with frequently asked questions on legal issues relating to stress, added March 2011, at www.tinyurl.com/3mkbwyy.
Some CIPD resources require registration with its website, but this is free.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
HARASSMENT AT WORK
Added 25/5/11. This information updates s.40.5.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Harassment in employment on the basis of a protected characteristic is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010, and any harassment is unlawful under the Protection of Harassment Act 1997. Case law has confirmed that under the 1997 Act the harassment must be oppressive and unreasonable, must have happened more than once and must have been serious enough to be criminal under s.2 of the Act, and an employer can be liable for harassment by its employees if there is a sufficiently close connection with employment. This would be in addition to the employer's liability under equality law, and under health and safety law for stress caused to the harassed employee.
In Veakins v Keir Islington Ltd, the court of appeal further clarified where behaviour within an employment relationship might fall within the definition under the Protection of Harassment Act. In this case, involving a trainee electrician who said she had been victimised and demoralised by her supervisor, it was held that the supervisor's conduct had crossed the line into behaviour which was oppressive and unacceptable and justified criminal liability. This behaviour included swearing at the employee, requiring her to sign in and out every day when others did not have to, and tearing up a complaint letter without having read it.
However, the court noted that in this case the harassment had been extraordinary, and that usually harassment cases would be dealt with by employment tribunals rather than through the courts.
The decision in Veakins v Keir is at www.bailii.org./ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/1288.htm.
For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE AS EMPLOYEES OR VOLUNTEERS
Added 30/1/11. This information updates ss.40.6.1, 28.6.3, 31.5 & 39.10.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Many areas of law affect the employment of children and young people up to minimum school leaving age or in some cases up to age 18: the law on what types of work they can and can't do and how many hours per day or week they can work, whether a local authority permit is required to hire the person, the Working Time Regulations, health and safety law, safeguarding, and byelaws imposed by individual local authorities. Some of these rules also apply to volunteering by children and young people.
The Department for Children, Schools and Families (now Department for Education) published in August 2009 Guidance on the employment of children, an excellent summary of the law in this complex field. I recommend it very highly, even though it's taken me nearly a year and a half to include it on this website.
In relation to volunteering, the guidance makes clear that in relation to requirements imposed by the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, a person who assists in a trade or occupation carried on for profit is considered as employed even though he or she may receive no payment. The guidance says, "In today's circumstances DCSF considers that any occupation where the aim is to make a surplus would be considered as trade or occupation carried on for profit so, in DCSF's view, unpaid work at a charity shop would count as employment, but not, for example, unpaid work at a youth club."
Even where volunteering might not be covered by the Children and Young Persons Act, it may still be covered by health and safety law, local authority byelaws or other areas of law.
Guidance on the employment of children is available from the Department for Education via tinyurl.com/4jd4mlt.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about equal opportunities in employment (VSLH3 chapter 28)
Go to archived items about leave (VSLH3 chapter 31)
Go to archived items about volunteers (VSLH3 chapter 39)
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
BASIC FIRST AID LEAFLET
Updated 8/1/12. This information updates s.40.9.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
HSE has updated its Basic advice on first aid at work leaflet, setting out what to do in an emergency, including how to deal with a person who is not breathing, severe bleeding, broken bones and spinal injuries, burns and eye injuries, and the records that should be kept. The paper leaflet, available from HSE, is number INDG347; the web version is at www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg347.pdf, and a list of all first aid resources is at www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/resources.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
RIDDOR CHANGES
Updated 22/9/11. This information updates s.40.9.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 12 September 2011 reporting of accidents under RIDDOR the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 will be predominantly online via the HSE website, with no more fax, post or email reporting. But fatal and major incidents and injuries will still be able to be reported by telephone, as well as via the HSE website.
As well as requiring serious work-related injuries and illness to be reported, RIDDOR also requires reporting of incidents that have the potential to case serious harm, and some injuries to the members of the public affected by the organisation's activities.
Information about RIDDOR is at www.hse.gov.uk/riddor.
In a separate RIDDOR development, the HSE agreed on 17 August 2011 to recommend to the secretary of state a proposal made by Lord Young, in his review of health and safety law, to amend RIDDOR. The change would extend the current "over three days" reporting period to over seven days, so employers would only have to report an incident or injury at work if an employee is absent from work for more than seven days.
HSE says the change will bring the incident reporting threshold into line with the period for obtaining a fit note from a GP for sickness absence, and will ensure that a person who has suffered a reportable injury would have a professional medical assessment. The Trades Union Congress, however, is concerned that the consultation on the proposal looked only at the cost implications for business, not the impact on injured workers and on safety.
HSE is also recommending that the period for reporting an accident under RIDDOR is extended from 10 to 15 days.
The RIDDOR regulations are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/3163/contents/made.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
REGISTER OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CONSULTANTS
Added 25/5/11. This information updates the resources section at the end of chapter 40 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Professional bodies representing general safety and occupational health consultants across the UK have established, with support from HSE, a register of occupational safety and health consultants. The register became available on 28 March 2011. Registration is not compulsory, but HSE hopes the register will become a benchmark for standards in the profession.
In order to register, consultants must be members of a relevant professional body and must confirm that they will demonstrate adequate continuing professional development, abide by their professional body's code of conduct,. provide sensible and proportionate advice, and have professional indemnity insurance or equivalent to cover the nature of their duties.
The register can be accessed free of charge at www.hse.gov.uk/oshcr/index.htm.
Go back to contents
Go to archived items about health & safety (VSLH3 chapter 40)
|