SANDY ADIRONDACK
Legal and governance training and consultancy
for the voluntary sector
OTHER CHAPTERS
I. THE ORGANISATION

Ch.1: Setting up an organisation
Ch.2: Unincorporated organisations
Ch.3: Incorporated organisations
Ch.4: Charitable status, charity law & regulation
Ch.5: The organisation's objects
Ch.6: The organisation's name
Ch.7: The governing document
Ch.8: Registering as a charity
Ch.9: Branches, subsidiaries & group structures
Ch.10: Changing legal form
Ch.11: Collaborative working, partnerships and mergers
II. GOVERNANCE
Ch.12: Members of the organisation
Ch.13: Members of the governing body
Ch.14: Officers, committees & sub-committees
Ch.15: Duties & powers of the governing body
Ch.16: Restrictions on payments & benefits
Ch.17: The registered office & other premises
Ch.18: Communication & paperwork
Ch.19: Meetings, resolutions & decision making
Ch.20: Assets & agency
Ch.21: Contracts & contract law
Ch.22: Risk & liability
Ch.23: Insurance
Ch.24: Financial difficulties & winding up
III. EMPLOYEES, WORKERS, VOLUNTEERS & OTHER STAFF
Ch.25: Employees & other workers
Ch.26: Rights, duties & the contract of employment
Ch.27: Model contract of employment
Ch.28: Equal opportunities in employment
Ch.29: Taking on new employees
Ch.30: Pay & pensions
Ch.31: Working time, time off & leave
Ch.32: Rights of parents & carers
Ch.33: Disciplinary matters, grievances & whistleblowing
Ch.34: Termination of employment
Ch.35: Redundancy
Ch.36: Employer-employee relations
Ch.37: Employment claims & settlement
Ch.38: Self employed & other contractors
Ch.39: Volunteers
IV. SERVICES & ACTIVITIES
Ch.40: Health & safety
Ch.41: Safeguarding children & vulnerable adults
Ch.42: Equal opportunities: goods, services & facilities
Ch.43: Data protection & use of information
Ch.44: Intellectual property
Ch.45: Publications, publicity & the internet
Ch.46: Campaigning & political activities
Ch.47: Public events, entertainment & licensing
V. FUNDING & FUNDRAISING
Ch.48: Funding & fundraising: General rules
Ch.49: Fundraising activities
Ch.51: Trading & social enterprise
Ch.52: Contracts & service agreements
VI. FINANCE
Ch.53: Financial procedures & security
Ch.54: Annual accounts, reports & returns
Ch.55: Auditors & independent examiners
Ch.56: Corporation tax, income tax & capital gains tax
Ch.57: Value added tax
Ch.58: Investment & reserves
Ch.59: Borrowing
VII. PROPERTY
Ch.60: Land ownership & tenure
Ch.61: Acquiring & disposing of property
Ch.62: Business leases
Ch.63: Property management & the environment
VIII. BACKGROUND TO THE LAW
Ch.64: How the law works
Ch.65: Dispute resolution & litigation
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR CHAPTER 50:
THE RUSSELL-COOKE
VOLUNTARY SECTOR LEGAL HANDBOOK

This page contains information that has appeared on Sandy Adirondack's legal update website for voluntary organisations at www.sandy-a.co.uk/legal.htm. For current updates, including potential changes that are in the pipeline, see the legal update website.

These websites for each chapter update the 3rd edition of The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook by James Sinclair Taylor and the Charity Team at Russell-Cooke Solicitors, edited by Sandy Adirondack (Directory of Social Change, 2009). The websites are not intended as a comprehensive update and should not be treated as such.

To order a copy of The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook, print out the order form at www.sandy-a.co.uk/bookserv.htm or send an email order by clicking . It costs £60 for voluntary organisations or £90 for others, plus 10% p&p.

To avoid spamming, an email address is not given on screen. If you can't see the word 'here' or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is bookservice at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.

The information here covers the law applicable to England and Wales. It may not apply in Northern Ireland and/or Scotland. These news items are not a full or definitive statement of the law and are not intended as a substitute for professional legal advice. No responsibility for loss occasioned as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting can be taken by the author.


Chapter 50
TAX-EFFECTIVE GIVING


The items below formerly appeared on the legal update website for voluntary organisations and are archived here. The content may be out of date and links may not work. For current updates to the chapter, see the legal update website for voluntary organisations at www.sandy-a.co.uk/finance.htm.

HMRC 'FIT AND PROPER PERSONS' TEST

Updated 17/3/12. This information updates chapters 56 & 50 and ss.57.5, 58.7.2 & 61.10.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Since 1 April 2010, any charity or community amateur sports club (CASC) recovering tax on gift aid donations has had to satisfy HM Revenue & Customs that it meets the management condition set out in schedule 6 of the Finance Act 2010. From 1 April 2012 (or 6 April 2012 for charitable trusts) the same rule applies to charities and CASCs claiming any charity tax relief or tax exemption administered by HMRC. These include income tax and capital gains tax (for trusts), corporation tax (for companies and other incorporated organisations, and unincorporated associations), inheritance tax, stamp duty, stamp duty land tax and stamp duty reserve tax, as well as VAT charity reliefs and exemptions.

The stated intention of the Finance Act schedule 6 was to reduce the risk of people setting up sham charities to claim tax reliefs, and the risk of charitable/CASC funds and tax reliefs being used for non-charitable/CASC purposes. But the main reason for the legislation was because the European Court of Justice ruled that a donor in one EU state should be eligible for tax reliefs on donations in another EU state, so the EU now needs to ensure that all charities eligible for tax relief anywhere in the EU are legitimate.

As well as meeting the management condition, charities must also meet a registration condition, which means they must comply with any requirement to be registered with the Charity Commission, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, or any comparable registration body in an EU member state, Iceland or Norway.

The management condition requires managers — governing body members, senior managers and others who are involved in claiming tax reliefs or who are able to exert control over how the charity's or CASC's funds are used — to be "fit and proper persons". "Fit and proper" is not defined in the legislation, but HMRC says a person is fit and proper if he or she ensures that funds and tax reliefs are used only for charitable or CASC purposes.

The governing body must be able to show, if required by HM Revenue & Customs to do so, that they "have given proper consideration to the suitability of people they appoint to positions of trust or influence in the organisation, where they are able to exert control over the organisation's finance and tax affairs". There is no defined procedure for this, but HMRC recommends that new "managers" (governing body members, senior managers and others meeting the definition above) are asked to read HMRC's basic guide on the fit and proper person test, and sign the declaration attached to the guide which the organisation should keep. The declaration should not be sent to HMRC unless requested.

If the "manager" has signed and there is no information of concern on the declaration, the organisation can assume the person meets the management condition unless HMRC contacts them. If the person refuses to sign the declaration and refuses to comply with any other attempts by the organisation to verify their suitability as a fit and proper person, the organisation should decide whether that person should be appointed as a "manager" and what financial responsibilities they should be given. If the person signs the declaration but adds information of concern in the 'additional information' box, the organisation will need to consider that information and decide whether to seek advice from HMRC on what to do.

HMRC does not need to be notified of all "managers". When a charity first registers with HMRC on form ChA1 or a CASC registers on form CASC(A1), the authorised official (the person within the charity or CASC notified to HMRC as authorised to deal with tax affairs, make gift aid or other repayment claims and, where necessary, sign and submit tax returns) and between two and four responsible persons, who will generally be members of the governing body, must be named. The authorised official and responsible persons must sign the form to confirm they have read the HMRC fit and proper persons guidance. Authorised officials or responsible persons appointed subsequently must also confirm on form ChV1 that they have read the guidance. The checks carried out by HMRC will depend on the level of control the person has over how charity funds are used, and whether the person has a history of, for example, tax-related fraud.

A nominee is a person or organisation outside the charity or CASC, who is authorised to submit gift aid or other repayment claims. Nominees are not "managers", but HMRC needs to be notified if a nominee is appointed or changed.

When senior managers are employed it may be sensible to make it a condition of employment that the employee must be and remain a fit and proper person, and to reserve the right to terminate the contract if HMRC makes a declaration that they are not.

Unless a charity is registering with HMRC to claim repayment of tax under gift aid or other tax repayment on form R68, there is generally no need to complete form ChA1 to claim other tax reliefs or exemptions.

Where charities are eligible for VAT zero rating (for example on fundraising materials, and some building works), suppliers may ask for confirmation that HMRC accepts the organisation as a charity. HMRC has advised that charities can use HMRC's letter confirming charitable status, with code CTY001 at the bottom, for this purpose.

HMRC's guidance on the definition of charity for the purposes of tax reliefs and tax exemptions, the fit and proper persons test and registering with HMRC for gift aid or other tax reliefs is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/tax/recognition.htm. A short summary of the changes, issued on 14 March 2012, is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/charity-definition.htm.

The Finance Act 2010 schedule 6 is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/13/schedule/6.
The orders extending the definition of charity to all relevant tax reliefs are at www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/735/made and www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/736/made.


CHARITY DONATIONS EXCLUDED FROM PROPOSED CAP ON INDIVIDUAL TAX RELIEF

Updated 11/2/13. This information updates s.50.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Following an active campaign by charities and philanthropists, chancellor George Osborne announced in an interview on 31 May 2012 that tax relief on donations to charity would not be included in the new cap on income tax reliefs. Civil Society eNews reported on 1 June 2012 that community investment tax relief (CITR) would also be excluded from the cap.

The government had announced in its budget on 21 March 2012 that from 6 April 2013 it would introduce a cap to ensure that individuals on higher incomes could not use tax reliefs excessively. For anyone seeking to claim more than £50,000 relief, a cap would be set at 25% of income. Gift aid donations, payroll giving and gifts of land and shares to charities, as well as community investment tax relief, would have been included in the cap, but the government did a u-turn on this.

Interestingly, the Treasury said it would not issue a press release on the sudden decision to exclude charitable donations and CITR.

The government consulted from 13 July to 5 October 2012 on how the tax cap would operate in relation to the other tax reliefs still included in the cap. A summary of responses to the consultation was issued on
11 December 2012. The consultation documents are on HM Treasury website via dtinyurl.com/84htj2z.

Go back to contents
Go to archived items about tax-effective giving (VSLH3 chapter 50)


PROPOSED CAP ON INDIVIDUAL TAX RELIEF

Updated 25/5/12. This information updates s.50.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government announced in its budget on 21 March 2012 (para 2.40) that from 6 April 2013 it will introduce a new cap on income tax reliefs, to ensure that those on higher incomes cannot use tax reliefs excessively. For anyone seeking to claim more than £50,000 relief, a cap will be set at 25% of income. Payroll giving, gifts of land and shares, and higher rate tax relief on gift aid donations will all be included in the cap, as well as community investment tax relief.

The government said it would explore with philanthropists ways to ensure this new limit on tax relief will not significantly affect charities that depend on large donations.

Response from the charity sector was immediate. Two days after the announcement, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, Charities Aid Foundation, Charity Tax Group, Charity Finance Group (formerly Charity Finance Directors’ Group), ACEVO and a number of other sector bodies launched the Give it back, George: Drop the charity tax campaign, calling for tax relief on charitable donations to be exempted from the cap. Information about the campaign and an opportunity to sign up (it takes only a few seconds) is at giveitbackgeorge.org/back-the-campaign.

The campaign believes the cap would counteract the government’s previous initiatives to encourage philanthropy, by having a serious impact on major donors who give large donations to many charities and who are behind many of the grant-giving trusts and foundations that support both large and small organisations. There is also concern that charitable giving is being equated with avoiding tax, simply because the availability of tax relief may be a factor in such giving.

Since then there have been meetings, pronouncements and media attention, so there is a real possibility of influencing how the cap will operate — but it appears unlikely that the government will backtrack on the cap itself. One possibility is that tax relief on donations to charities and community amateur sports clubs (CASCs) will be excluded from the cap, but if the government will not agree to this there is no clear consensus within the charity sector about what the next best option would be.

When an individual makes a donation to a charity or CASC under the gift aid scheme, the organisation can claim from HMRC an amount equivalent to the basic rate tax the donor would have paid on the amount (currently 25p for each pound donated). The charity's or CASC's claims will not be affected by the cap. But individuals who pay tax at the higher rate can claim tax relief on the tax they would have paid at that rate. This relief would be included in the proposed cap — and so also will the amount of tax the organisation can claim under gift aid.

So if, for example, a donor gives £100,000 to charities or CASCs, the charities can still claim £25,000 gift aid (20% basic rate tax). This £25,000 to which the charities are entitled, plus any higher rate tax relief to which the donor would be entitled, count towards the cap on the donor's tax relief.

To make things even worse for donors, if charities or CASCs claim more in gift aid than the total relief to which the donor is entitled, the donor will have to pay that additional amount to HMRC.

As well as affecting wealthy donors to charities and CASCs, the cap on tax reliefs could also affect investors in social enterprises who are eligible for tax relief on their investments and the relief is not already capped.

The Treasury and HMRC issued a guidance note in March, described by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations' head of research as possibly "the most unhelpful clarification document ever written", on how the cap will operate. The guidance note is on the Treasury website via tinyurl.com/cbwokg7. Much more helpfully Bates Wells & Braithwaite Solicitors issued a briefing on 8 May 2012 on how the tax cap, as currently envisaged, would operate. This briefing can be accessed at tinyurl.com/brahp3p.

The government will issue a consultation document in
summer 2012.


CHARITY DONATIONS TO AND FROM EEA STATES

Added 21/11/10. This information updates s.50.1.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
In January 2009 the European court of justice ruled that a donor in one EU member state should be eligible for tax relief on donations to a charity in another EU state, provided that the donor can show that the recipient meets the requirements for charitable status in the donor's home country.

This decision, in Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid [2009] EUECJ C-318/07, led directly to the requirement that charities in the UK, as well as charities in other EU member states, Iceland and Norway which claim UK tax reliefs or on which UK donors claim tax relief, must meet the requirements in the Finance Act 2010 schedule 6. These are that the organisation must be established for charitable purposes as defined in the Charities Act 2006, must be subject to the jurisdiction of a UK court or a court in the EEA, must comply with any obligation in their country to be registered with a charity regulator, and must be run by fit and proper persons.

The Finance Act 2010 schedule 6 is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/13/schedule/6.
Guidance for UK donors who want to claim tax reliefs on donations to charities in other EEA states, or UK charities which want to claim tax relief on donations from EEA states, is available from HMRC on 0845 302 0203 or charities@hmrc.gov.uk.


GIFT AID

Donor benefit
Updated 1/4/12. This information updates s.50.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
An individual or corporate gift aid donor cannot receive goods, membership services, or other services or benefits (including, for example, discounts on goods or services) in return for their gift aid donation unless these comply with the donor benefit rules. The maximum value of the benefits that a donor, or a person connected with the donor, can receive in return for his, her or its donations is:

  • if the total donations are £100 or less, benefits worth up to 25% of the total gift aid donations (net of tax) in the tax year;
  • if total donations are from £101 to £1,000, benefits worth up to £25;
  • if total donations are more than £1,000, benefits worth up to 5% of the total donations, to a maximum of £2,500 (for donations on or after 6 April 2011). For earlier donations, the maximum donor benefit was £500.
The limit applies separately to each donation.

Social Economy issue 105 (January 2012, published by Unity Trust Bank and Wrigleys Solicitors) reported that HMRC had made a number of unannounced piecemeal changes to its detailed gift aid guidance on donor benefit rules at www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/gift_aid/benefits.htm. The article lists the following as some of the key changes.
  • Where a benefit is attendance at an event that is not open to the public (so there is no ticket price on which to base the value) and it is not a fundraising event, the benefit should be valued by working out the cost to the charity (or third parties) of staging the event, and dividing it by the number of people at the event. Social Economy says this appears to mean that a private dinner for donors, for example, would be viewed by HMRC as a donor benefit, even if the purpose was to discuss how the charity might approach the donors' contacts with a view to raising more funds.


  • Organisations offering life membership need to estimate the value of all the benefits that will be received over the first 10 years of the membership. In order to do this, Social Economy says the organisation might need to keep complete records of all the discounts and benefits received by its members.


  • HMRC has now specified that only literature describing the organisation's work, such as newsletters, annual reports or a members' handbook, is deemed to have no financial value and therefore does not constitute a benefit. Organisations which provide other literature in return for donations or membership subscriptions on which gift aid is recovered should ensure it is within the donor benefit rules.


  • The rules on split payments — where part of the payment is to cover the cost of the benefit and part is a donation eligible for gift aid — have been tightened.
The Social Economy article can be accessed via tinyurl.com/7mhhyp9.

School charities
Updated 1/4/12. This information updates s.50.2.1 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
HMRC published in August 2011 a gift aid and payroll giving guide for school charities, replacing and going beyond its previous guidance on educational school trips and school trusts. The new guidance includes these topics, as well as issues such as appeals to fund extra lessons and for a range of other specific purposes, appeals towards school running costs, sponsored events and other fundraising events. The guidance can be accessed via tinyurl.com/72t7otx.

GIFT AID

Added 26/4/09. This information is included in s.50.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
HM Revenue & Customs has issued a revised gift aid declaration form, showing the dates of the tax year (6 April to 5 April). The form is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/appendix_b1.pdf. There is no need to ask donors who have already made declarations to change them, but charities and community amateur sports clubs should use the new form (or revise their own form so it follows the recommended wording on the new HMRC form) for new declarations.

Currently, tax on gift aid donations can be recovered for up to six years from the end of the tax year in which the donation was made, but to get transitional relief (the 3p in the £1 supplement for gift aid donations in 2008/09, 2009/10 and 2010/11) the claim must be made within two years from the end of the tax year. The six-year limit for ordinary claims (without transitional relief) will decrease to four years from April 2010.

HMRC's guidance on all aspects of gift aid is at www.hmrc.gov.uk/charities/gift_aid/basics.htm.


HMRC 'FIT AND PROPER PERSONS' TEST

Updated 20/11/10. This information updates s.50.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
From 1 April 2010, any charity or community amateur sports club (CASC) recovering tax on gift aid donations must satisfy HM Revenue & Customs that it meets the "management condition" set out in schedule 6 of the Finance Act 2010. From 2012 the same rule will apply to charities and CASCs claiming other tax reliefs and tax exemptions.

The stated intention is to reduce the risk of people setting up sham charities to claim tax reliefs, and the risk of charitable/CASC funds and tax reliefs being used for non-charitable/CASC purposes. But the main reason for the legislation is because the European Court of Justice ruled that a donor in one EU state should be eligible for tax reliefs on donations in another EU state, so the EU now needs to ensure that all charities eligible for tax relief anywhere in the EU are legitimate.

As well as meeting the management condition, charities must also meet a registration condition, which means they must comply with any requirement to be registered with the Charity Commission, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, or any comparable registration body in an EU member state.

The management condition requires managers — governing body members and others who are involved in claiming tax reliefs or who are able to exert control over how the charity's or CASC's funds are used — to be "fit and proper persons". "Fit and proper" is not defined in the legislation, but HMRC says a person is fit and proper if he or she ensures that funds and tax reliefs are used only for charitable or CASC purposes.

Managers include:

  • the authorised official, a person within the charity or CASC notified to HMRC as authorised to deal with tax affairs, make gift aid or other repayment claims and, where necessary, sign and submit tax returns;
  • a nominee, if any — a person or organisation outside the charity or CASC, who is authorised to submit gift aid or other repayment claims;
  • between two and four responsible persons, who will generally be members of the governing body. This requirement was changed in July 2010; prior to this HMRC had defined all governing body members and cheque signatories as responsible persons.

Charities and CASCs which are already registered with HMRC need to submit managers' details only when a new manager is appointed, using variation form ChV1. Charities and CASCs registering with HMRC for the first time must submit details of all managers as defined above, on application form ChA1. The checks carried out by HMRC will depend on the level of control the person has over how charity funds are used, and whether the person has a history of, for example, tax-related fraud.

HMRC requires the governing body to be able to show, if asked, that they "have given proper consideration to the suitability of people they appoint to positions of trust or influence in the organisation, where they are able to exert control over the organisation's finance and tax affairs". There is no defined procedure for this, but HMRC recommends that new managers and other governing body members are asked to read HMRC's basic guide on the fit and proper person test, and sign the attached declaration. The charity should then keep the declaration. It should not be sent to HMRC unless requested.

Lawyers, accountants, and sector bodies have said that the new rules will not achieve their purpose, and will impose an unnecessary burden on charities registered with and monitored by the Charity Commission, OSCR and, in due course, the Charity Commission for Northern Ireland. For charities that are not required to be registered with a regulator and for CASCs, they recommend that the fit and proper person rules should apply only to governing body members, not senior employees.

The Finance Act 2010 schedule 6 is at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/13/schedule/6.
HMRC's detailed guidance on the fit and proper persons test can be accessed via tinyurl.com/3a9tmpw. The page has links to its basic guide with model declaration.

GIFT AID ON DONATIONS TO CHARITY SHOPS

Added 11/7/10. This information updates s.50.2.2.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
A new guide explains in detail how gift aid can be claimed on donations of goods to charity shops. It provides illustrations of appropriate accounting treatments, as well as background information on other tax and VAT issues and the legal framework affecting different types of shop activities. Written by Sayer Vincent for Help the Hospices, this guide is relevant to all charities running their own shops. It can be downloaded via tinyurl.com/3vp52ks.


THE END OF SELF ASSESSMENT GIVING

Updated 16/10/12. This information updates s.50.3 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Partly to fund the introduction of Charities Online system for gift aid [see Gift aid repayment claims], SA Donate was withdrawn for repayments of tax due to self assessment taxpayers on or after 6 April 2012. Under SA Donate, self assessment taxpayers could tick a box on their tax return to have some or all of any overpaid tax due to them, plus gift aid, paid to a charity of their choice.

The scheme was started in 2005 but was not well used. Charities which received donations through the scheme may want to encourage those donors to give ordinary gift aid donations or, if applicable, to donate through payroll giving.

The provisions for withdrawal are in the Finance Act 2012, at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/14/contents.

HMRC's guidance on self assessment giving is at tinyurl.com/6eele2w.


TAX EXEMPTION FOR PAYROLL GIVING INCOME

Added 22/5/10. This information updates s.50.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Under the Finance Act 2010 schedule 8 para.1, new rules on tax relief apply to donations made on or after 24 March 2010 through payroll giving. As is already the case with other donations to charities, the charity is liable for tax on the income, and can exclude the donation from taxable income only to the extent that it is used for charitable purposes. Charitable companies (which in this context includes charitable associations, but not charitable trusts) must make a claim for exemption from corporation tax on eligible payroll giving income.

Schedule 8 is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/ukpga_20100013_en_15.
The explanatory note is at www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2010/en/ukpgaen_20100013_en_6.
Details are available from HMRC Charities on 0845 302 0203 or charities@hmrc.gov.uk.


CHANGES IN INHERITANCE TAX

Updated 22/4/12. This information updates s.50.6.2 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
As announced in budget 2011, inheritance tax (IHT) was reduced from 40% to 36% for donors who die on or after 6 April 2012 and leave more than 10% of their net estate to charities or registered community amateur sports clubs. "Net estate" means the value of the estate after all inheritance tax exemptions, reliefs and the nil rate band (taxed at 0%) have been deducted.

The estate is divided into a survivorship component (property which passes automatically to a surviving joint owner), a settled property component (such as life interests in trusts), and the general component which includes nearly all other property. The 10% test is applied to each component separately, and the 36% rate of inheritance tax applies to any of the components that pass the test. The provisions are in clause 207 and schedule 32 of the Finance (No.4) Bill, which can be accessed on the Parliament website via tinyurl.com/d48o7wz. Explanatory notes are on the Treasury website via tinyurl.com/cyo4ftl.

HMRC guidance and an inheritance tax reduced rate calculator were issued on 6 April 2012 and can be accessed via tinyurl.com/7eeowfg.

To encourage the widespread use of this provision and its promotion by charities and professional advisors, and to help ensure legacies will qualify, the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) published on 10 February 2012 a draft model clause for wills. The clause will be reviewed when the final wording of the legislation is known. In the meantime the draft clause can be accessed via tinyurl.com/875pbzo.


ISSUES IN CHALLENGING LEGACIES

Updated 3/3/12. This information updates s.50.6.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Gifts in wills may be challenged in the courts by anyone, but this is most commonly done by relatives who feel they have not been provided for, or by a charity or other party who believes the will is invalid or has not been properly administered.

In 2007 a house worth £169,000 was left by Mr Mason to his friends Mr and Mrs Sharp. From his pecuniary assets of approximately £780,000 he left legacies to his brother and the Sharps. He stated that the legacies should total the maximum amount he could leave tax-free at the date of his death (£300,000), and that any inheritance tax should be paid from his residual estate. The residue of his estate was left to the RSPCA.

The Sharps received the house and £200,000 (two-thirds of the tax-free amount), and the brother received £100,000. This left inheritance tax on the house to be paid out of the remainder.

The RSPCA challenged this, saying the £169,000 value of the house should have been included within the £300,000 tax-free amount — so only £131,000, not the full £300,000, should have been divided between the three beneficiaries. This interpretation of the will would have significantly increased the RSPCA's share.

In a decision on 19 February 2010 a high court judge found that the wording of the will was clear and that IHT should come out of the remainder after the beneficiaries had received the house and the full £300,000. The judge added, "It is a matter of regret in my view that this action was ever brought. ... I know it is said that trustees of charitable organisations are required to maximise the return for their charity but I really wonder whether the discharge of that duty required this action to be brought. In my view the RSPCA ... ought really to have considered that the residuary legacy that I have determined it is entitled to was generous and ample provision out of this estate." The judge also ordered the RSPCA to pay the beneficiaries' legal costs, and refused permission to appeal.

In May 2010 the ruling preventing the RSPCA from appealing was overturned, and the RSPCA appealed. On 21 December 2010 the court of appeal reversed the original decision, saying the amount to be divided between the three beneficiaries should be £300,000 including the value of the house. The RSPCA was also discharged from the obligation to pay the beneficiaries' legal costs.

The high court decision in RSPCA v Sharp & others is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/268.html.
This court of appeal decision reversing the earlier one is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1474.html.

In another case involving the RSPCA, Ilott v Mitson & others, Heather Ilott was excluded from her estranged mother's will, with the entire £486,000 estate bequeathed to the RSPCA, RSPB and Blue Cross (also an animal charity). The mother left a detailed letter for her executors explaining that she had excluded her daughter because the daughter had left home at age 17 in 1978 and had seen her mother only twice since. The letter said, "If my daughter should bring a claim against my estate I instruct my executors to defend such a claim as I see no reason why my daughter should benefit in any way from my estate."

Ilott challenged the will and after refusing attempts by the charities to settle, brought a claim under the Inheritance (Provisions for Family and Dependents) Act 1975. This act allows a person to claim "reasonable financial provision" from an estate, but it applies only to a spouse, civil partner or person living together as spouse or civil partner of the deceased, and other persons who immediately before the death of the deceased were being maintained, either wholly or in part, by the deceased.

Even though Ilott had not been maintained by her mother since leaving home, a district judge awarded her £50,000 in 2007 on the basis that it was not reasonable for her mother to have completely excluded her and that Ilott was in financial need.

Ilott sought to appeal against the amount, but the three charities cross-appealed on the basis that the mother's will and letter made clear that she wanted the entire amount to be given to the charities. In a decision in 2009 the high court agreed with the charities and dismissed Ilott's claim, with the result that she would get nothing.

Ilott then appealed to the court of appeal, which in March 2011 upheld her appeal on the basis that she was an adult child in financial need. The court directed that her appeal against the amount of the £50,000 award be heard by a different high court judge. The court of appeal also urged the parties to consider a compromise rather than yet another hearing. [I haven't seen anything further, so it may have been settled without an additional court case or a case may be in the pipeline.]

The charities involved have warned that this decision sets a "dangerous precedent for future legacy cases where anyone could choose to appeal against the will of a close family member on the grounds of their own financial situation regardless of the documented wishes of the deceased". The charities' solicitor said that the decision "creates uncertainty about a person's right to leave money to people or organisations of their choice".

The decision also illustrates the issues trustees face when a will is challenged or when they feel they should challenge a will: is the best use of charity funds to concede or take no action, or challenge, or attempt to settle without taking legal action?

The court of appeal decision in Ilott v Mitson & others is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/346.html. There is a link within the document to the earlier high court decision.
A Barrister Magazine article about the case, by Ilott's barrister, is at tinyurl.com/85co89w.

For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.


ISSUES IN CHALLENGING LEGACIES

Updated 1/12/10. This information updates s.50.6.4 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Gifts in wills may be challenged in the courts by anyone, but this is most commonly done by relatives who feel they have not been provided for, or by a charity or other party who believes the will is invalid or has not been properly administered.

Two recent cases, both involving the RSPCA, illustrate the issues in charities challenging wills, the importance of getting legal advice at a very early stage and considering mediation as an alternative to litigation, and the importance of encouraging supporters who are or might be leaving legacies to discuss this with their family.

In Gill v RSPCA, Dr Christine Gill challenged her mother's will which left her farm, valued at approximately £2.1 million, to the RSPCA, disinheriting Dr Gill. Prior to the case coming to trial there had been a series of offers, ranging from the RSPCA offering £50,000 and Gill saying she wanted the farm but would give £500,000 to the RSPCA, to the RSPCA offering £650,000 and her legal costs, to her saying she would settle for part of the land with the RSPCA keeping the rest of the estate, including land valued at £1.06 million. Throughout these offers and counter-offers Gill had consistently asked for mediation, and the RSPCA had refused.

When the case came to court Dr Gill argued that her father had put her mother under undue duress in making her will, that both of her parents had repeatedly promised her that she would inherit the farm, and that she had put curtailed her own career to look after her parents. In its decision on 9 October 2009, the court set aside the will. This decision is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2009/B34.html.

In a separate judgment on costs on 7 January 2010, the court said that the RSPCA, partly because of its unwillingness to mediate, would have to pay its £400,000 legal costs and most of Gill's £900,000 costs. The decision does not appear to be on BAILII but can be accessed via tinyurl.com/2bzc4qk.

When Dr Gill challenged her mother's bequest to the RSPCA, the RSPCA's trustees had a duty to protect the bequest due to them as part of the charity's assets — but also had a duty to act in the interests of the charity. We can't know their reasons for going to court without even trying mediation, but this case provides a lesson in what can happen.

The RSPCA appealed but on 14 December 2010 the court of appeal upheld the high court's decision in Gill's favour, saying that the will was invalid because Mrs Gill suffered from a rare mental condition which meant she would not have known and approved the contents, she had been very fond of and dependent on her daughter, and that she had no apparent previous connection with the RSPCA and had been derogatory about them.

This decision is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1430.html .

Only six weeks after the costs decision in Gill, the RSPCA was criticised on 19 February 2010 in another legacy case. In this one Mr Mason left a house worth £169,000 to his friends Mr and Mrs Sharp, with the condition that any inheritance tax on the property should be paid from his residual estate. From his pecuniary assets of approximately £780,000 he left legacies to his brother and the Sharps totalling the maximum amount he could leave tax-free at the date of his death (£300,000). The residue of his estate was left to the RSPCA.

The Sharps received the house and their share of the tax-free amount, and the brother received his share of the tax-free amount. This left inheritance tax on the house to be paid out of the remainder.

The RSPCA challenged this, saying the £169,000 value of the house should have been included within the £300,000 tax-free amount — so only £131,000, not the full £300,000, should have been divided between the three beneficiaries. This interpretation of the will would have increased the RSPCA's share from approximately £370,000 to £650,000.

The judge found that the wording of the will was clear and added, "It is a matter of regret in my view that this action was ever brought. ... I know it is said that Trustees of charitable organisations are required to maximise the return for their charity but I really wonder whether the discharge of that duty required this action to be brought. In my view the RSPCA ... ought really to have considered that the residuary legacy that I have determined it is entitled to was generous and ample provision out of this estate."

The decision in RSPCA v Sharp & others is at www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/268.html.

For summaries and articles about cases, do a Google search on key words in the case name or content.


SUBSTANTIAL DONORS / TAINTED DONATIONS

Updated 3/3/12. This information updates s.50.7 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
Under tainted charity donations rules which are in effect for donations received on or after 1 April 2011, a donor can become liable to repay to HMRC the tax relief claimed by a charity or community amateur sports club on a donation that turns out to be "tainted". A donation is tainted if:

  • one of its main purposes, as set out in a formal or informal arrangement before or after the donation was made, is to provide a direct or indirect financial advantage to a donor or connected person (beyond what is allowed under the gift aid donor benefit rules); and
  • it is reasonable to assume that the donation would not have been made without the arrangement for the benefit, or vice versa.
Under the previous substantial donor rules, the charity or CASC rather than the donor was liable to repay any wrongly claimed tax relief. Under the tainted donation rules, the organisation is liable only if it was party to the arrangement and aware of the donor's purpose.

Another change from the substantial donor rules is that they applied only to donations to a charity/CASC or linked charities of £25,000 or more in a 12-month period or £150,000 in a six-year period. The tainted donation rules apply to donations of any size.

Like the substantial donor rules, the new rules do not apply to arrangements between a charity and its trading subsidiary.

Under transitional arrangements, the substantial donor rules will continue to apply until April 2013 to people who were substantial donors before April 2011.

Some commentators believe that the tainted donation rules are unnecessary, because tainted transactions would be caught anyway under existing rules on gift aid, donor benefit and charity investment. They argue that the both the substantial donor and tainted donation rules cause unnecessary bureaucracy.

The tainted donation provisions are in the Finance Act 2011 s.27 and sch.3 at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/11/contents.
There is a good Taxjournal.com summary at tinyurl.com/84hudec.

GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES THAT WANT TO SUPPORT CHARITIES

Added 7/3/10. This information updates s.50.9 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The Treasury, Office of the Third Sector and HM Revenue & Customs jointly issued A guide to giving for businesses in November 2009, setting out the ways in which businesses can support charities, and the tax reliefs and other incentives for doing so. The guide covers donations of money, shares, land, trading stock or equipment; sponsoring a charity; seconding employees; encouraging employees to volunteer or donate to charity; and investing in a disadvantaged community or in improving the urban environment.

The guide can be accessed via tinyurl.com/y8bcvqr.


COMMUNITY INVESTMENT TAX RELIEF

Added 1/4/12. This information updates s.50.10 in The Russell-Cooke Voluntary Sector Legal Handbook (VSLH3).
The government announced in the budget on 21 March 2012 that from 6 April 2013, restrictions on community investment tax relief will be relaxed, with new rules which will allow investors to carry forward unused tax relief granted under the scheme and will give community development finance institutions (CDFIs) longer to lend the funds they receive. CDFIs lend to charities, social enterprises, businesses and individuals in disadvantaged communities.

Community investment tax relief allows investors in CDFIs to reclaim up to 25% of their investment over five years.

Following the budget several social enterprise bodies, including Social Enterprise UK, issued a joint statement welcoming the changes but expressing disappointment that CITR reform had been considerably watered down from what the sector had asked for. The statement can be accessed via tinyurl.com/c2e5zrs.




| Home | About Sandy Adirondack | Legal update for voluntary organisations | Legal update: Employment, equal ops, health & safety | Legal update: Managing the organisation | Open training | In-house training | Consulting | Mentoring | Books by post |


© 2011 Sandy Adirondack.
To avoid spamming, an email address is not given on screen. If you can't see the word 'Sandy' or have trouble sending an email by clicking on it, the address is sandy at sandy-a.co.uk, with the spaces and 'at' replaced by the @ symbol.

SANDY ADIRONDACK
Governance and legal training and consultancy
for the voluntary sector

39 Gabriel House, 10 Odessa Street, London SE16 7HQ
Tel 020 7232 0726; fax 020 7237 8117
Email:
Web: www.sandy-a.co.uk